Flipperentiated Learning in Biology Class to Improve Cognitive Learning Outcomes, Problem-Solving Skill, and Motivation

Khoe Yao Tung, A. Alissa

Abstract


The background of this research began with an apprehension of the need for students’ learning in accordance with their learning abilities relating to the application of a flipped classroom model in the Biology class of XYZ Senior High School. Preliminary research showed the different needs of individual students; thus, differentiated learning was required especially in the face-to-face meeting in class. Differentiated learning aims to facilitate the different needs of the students based on the level of readiness, learning style preference, and interest. This research aimed at improving the students’ learning and its impact on students’ cognitive learning outcomes, problem-solving skills development, and learning motivation through the differentiated flipped classroom. The method used in this research was Classroom Action Research. The data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and evaluation of assessment results based on rubrics and marking schemes. All three variables are measured using rubrics separated from each other. These data are analyzed qualitatively and given a score in quantitative values. In three cycles of action research, the students’ learning outcomes cognitively showed a significant increase from the first cycle to the second cycle. From the second cycle to the third cycle, there was a decrease but the decline was not significant. The problem-solving skills increase from the first cycle to the second cycle. In the third cycle, there was an increase until it reached the specified success indicator. In each cycle, the motivation did not increase significantly and tended to be stable but the Attention-Relevance-Confident-Satisfaction (ARCS) motivation model had reached the indicators of the success of the study. The conclusions of this research indicated improvements in the students’ problem-solving skills, a high average in motivation indicators, and a significant improvement in cognitive learning outcomes.

Keywords


Flipped Classroom, Flipperentiated, Differentiated, Stations Instructional Strategies, Problem-Solving Skills, Learning Motivation, Cognitive Learning Outcomes, Classroom Action Research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkaraju, S. (2016). The Role of Flipped Learning in Managing the Cognitive Load of Threshold Concept in Physiology. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(3), 28-43.

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Demetry, C. (2010). Work in progress – A innovation merging classroom flip and team-based learning in Proceeding of Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. TIE-1-T1E-2).FIE.http://dx.doi/10.1109/FI-2010.5673617

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning, and Instruction: Theory into Practice (3 rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Ghoneim N. M. M. (2017). Using Flipperentiated Instruction to Enhance Preparatory Stage Pupils’ EFL Reading Comprehension Skills. Faculty of Education Journal, Menoufia University, 1(4).

Hess, A. N. (2015). Motivational Design in Information Literacy Instruction. Communication in Information Literacy, 9(1), 44-59.

Heidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (1992). 1: Interest, Learning, and Development. in The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, ed. K. Ann Renninger, Suzanne Hidi, and Andreas Krapp. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Iwaniec, M., Simmonds, T., & Swan, Z. (2017). A Practical Case Study Exploring How Flipped Learning Affects The Development of Problem Solving Skills in Two Different Disciplines. Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-17.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for the ARCS Learning and Performance Model Approach. Springer

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R (2014). The Action Research Planner; Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer.

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective, and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 33.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.

Tahir, S. Z. (2012). Redefining Terms of Teaching and Learning Strategy Methods, Approach, Technique, and Models. English Department of the University of Iqra Buru.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding To The Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). Published by Pearson Education, Inc., by special arrangement with the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Tomlinson, C. A. & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for Differentiating Schools and Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson C. A. & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design Connecting Content and Kids. ASCD Publisher.

Unal, Z. & Unal, A. (2017). Comparison of Student Performance, Student Perception, and Teacher Satisfaction with Traditional versus Flipped Classroom Model. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 145-164.

Wardhani, I. G. A. K. & Wihardit, K. (2014). Classroom action research (18th print). South Tangerang, Indonesia: Universitas Terbuka.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.1p.183

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.