The Effect of Using Blackboard on English Majors’ Writing Proficiency and Attitudes

Mohamed Ali Mohamed Kassem


This article reports the findings of a case study on the implementation of Blackboard Learning Management System in the Department of English, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. The study aims at exploring the effects of using Blackboard, an interactive computer-mediated learning environment, on English majors’ writing proficiency and examining their attitudes towards the use of Blackboard. Three indicators were used, namely, accuracy, fluency and complexity to estimate students’ writing proficiency. The Profile of Larsen-Freeman (2006) was employed to assess students’ writing proficiency. Students’ attitudes were measured through a questionnaire that is divided into three domains: (a) demographic and personal information, (b) implementation strategies of Blackboard and (c) students’ attitudes towards Blackboard. Results of the study revealed a significant positive effect of using Blackboard on developing English majors’ writing proficiency. In addition, students showed a positive attitude towards the use of Blackboard.


Blackboard, Writing Proficiency, Attitudes, English Majors

Full Text:



Al Turki, U., Aldraiweesh, A. & Kinshuck, X. (2016). Evaluating the usability and accessibility of LMS ‘Blackboard’ at King Saud University, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 33-44.

Al-Khalifa, H. (2010). A First step in evaluating the usability of JUSUR Learning Management System. Paper Presented at the 3rd Annual Forum on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2010: Bringing Global Quality to a Local Context. February 1st- 3rd, Dubai, U.A.E.

Al-Mouh, N., Al-Khalifa, A. & Al-Khalifa, H. (2014). A first look into MOOCs accessibility: The case of Coursera. Computers Helping People with Special Needs In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 8547, 145–152.

Alqurashi, F. (2005). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Composition Classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Doctoral Dissertation, Ball State University.

Badawood, A. (2011). A systematic approach to faculty development towards improved capability in tertiary teaching in a blended learning environment. Doctoral Dissertation, Lawrence Technological University.

Black, E. (2008). Toolkit approach to integrating library resources into the learning management system. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 496-501.

Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.

Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Choudhury, M. (2015). Texts, contexts and motivational strategies in teaching literature to Saudi students. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(8), 19-35.

Flowers, J. (2001). Online learning needs in teaching technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 17-30.

Fellner, T. & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15-26.

Hussein, E. (2016). The effectiveness of using blackboard in improving the English listening and speaking skills of the female students at the University of Hail. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(12), 81-93.

Inversini, A., Botturi, L. & Triacca, L. (2006). Evaluating LMS usability for enhanced e-learning experience. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006-- World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 595-601, Orlando, FL USA.

Ja’ashan, M. (2015) Perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning for English courses: A case study of students at University of Bisha. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 40-50.

Kim, S., & Seo, B. (2009). The development of e-learning platform for gifted children education. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 3(1), 39-51.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 24(7), 590-619.

Lukow, J. & Ross, C. (2003). How learning styles affect student attitudes toward technology. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education,18(1), 67-80.

Melton, J. (2004). The CMS moodle: A heuristic evaluation. Paper presented at JALTCALL2004, Mito, Japan.

Schimidt, K. (2002). Classroom action research: A case study assessing students' perceptions and learning outcomes of classroom teaching versus on-line teaching. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40(1), 45-59.

Sherman, P. (2009). UPA Salary Survey. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Woods, G. (2004). Student perceptions of web-based technologies, principles of good practice, and multiple intelligences. Doctoral Dissertation, Alliant International University at San Diego.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.