The Concomitance of VLS with Learning Styles in Fostering Reflection among University Students

Sana Sakale, Zrari Ayoub

Abstract


This study attempts to unveil the Concomitance of vocabulary learning strategies with learning styles in fostering reflection among university students during reading comprehension texts. For this purpose, data is collected employing a primary data source in the form of a structured close-ended questionnaire, which is addressed, respectively, to students from the Departments of English Studies in different universities. The participants of this quantitative study are 84 students recruited using a non-probability convenience sampling. In this study, two data analysis methods are used: descriptive analysis and Pearson correlational analysis. The former summarizes the demographic variables and shows that students employ a duality of styles as they prefer to integrate a multi-modal approach to learning, while the latter analyzes the concomitance of the variables. The findings of the Pearson correlation analysis reveal significant relationships of interest in this study. The most salient findings indicate that there is a significant moderate positive association between the learner’s preferences on the one hand, and preparation phase strategies and the teacher’s role on the other hand. Additionally, teacher’s role is significantly associated with preparation phase strategies, production phase strategies and learner’s role. The results of the Pearson correlation indicate that vocabulary learning strategies can also be associated with the classroom environment and management. The study proposes that training in metacognitive, cognition and VL strategies be implemented in language classrooms to increase students’ control over learning and to facilitate their knowledge acquisition.

Keywords


VLS (vocabulary learning Strategies), LS (Learning Styles), MS (Metacognitive strategies), CS (Cognitive Strategies), RC (Reading Comprehension), PC (Pearson Correlation)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, J., Khan, H., Raeside, R., & White, D. (2007). Research methods for graduate business and social science students. SAGE Publication India Pvt Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9788132108498

Anderson, N. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, 1-5.

Arbabisarjou, A., Sotoudeh, M., Zare, S., Shahrakipour, M., Ghoreishinia, & G. (2016). Is there any relationship between student’s learning styles and self-efficacy? International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 1832-1838.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Bygate, M. (1991). Speaking. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Bygate, M. (2009). Teaching and testing speaking. In M. H. Long, & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbookof Language Teaching (pp. 412-440). (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics). Wiley-Blackwell.

Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21.1.01car

Chamot, A.U. & EI-Dniary, P.B. (1999). Children’s learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-341. http://www.jstor.org/stable/330256

Cunningham, P., Matusovich, H., Morelock J, R., & Hunter, D. (2016). Beginning to understand and promote engineering students’ metacognitive development. American Society for Engineering Education, 1-10.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2019). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among university students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545

Ghaedi, Z., & Jam, B. (2014). Relationship between learning styles and motivation for higher education in EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1232-1237. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.6.1232-1237

González, G., & María, A. (2017). Reading comprehension in an English as a foreign language setting: Teaching strategies for sixth graders based on the interactive model of reading. Revista Folios, (45), 159-175. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=345949158012

Hardiana, M. T. A., & Suyata, P. (2018). The effectiveness of VAK (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) model in learning of summary writing. International Journal of Research and Review, 5(8), 43-49. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.5_Issue.8_Aug2018/IJRR008.pdf

Ilcin, N., Tomruk, M., Yesilyaprak, S, S., Karadibak, D., & Savci, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in Turkish physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Kultar, S. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publication India Pvt Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9789351507741

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276

Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M., Quenk, N, L., & Hammer, A. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the myers-briggs type indication (3rd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.

Nation, P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656

Newman, D. A. (2014). Missing data: Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811454859

Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson, & P. Voller (Eds.). Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490

Olson, C. B., & Land, R. (2007). A cognitive strategies approach to reading and writing instruction for English language learners in secondary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(3), 269-303. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ776476

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publication. https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2371383

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.

Oxford, R.L. & Leaver, B.L. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learners. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 227-246). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.

Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. Walter de Gruyter, 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.012

Öztürk, M. B., & Aydoğmuşn, M. (2021). Relational assessment of metacognitive reading strategies and reading motivation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 357-375.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011

Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In D. N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching; Second edition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057

Stern, H, H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.

Suyitno, I. (2017). Cognitive strategies use in reading comprehension and its contributions to students’ achievement. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(3), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.3.05

Tabrizi, M., Bengar, H. A., & Bengar, E. A. (2021). The effectiveness of reading comprehension and vocabulary via cognitive strategies across gender. Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 3(2), 652-668. https://www.jeltal.ir/article_141263.html

Trujillo, C. L., Alvarez, C. P., Zamudio, M. N., & Morales, G. (2015). Facilitating vocabulary learning through metacognitive strategy training and learning journals. Colom.Appl.Linguist.J. 17(2), 246-259. http://hdl.handle.net/10818/33148

Whitebread, D., Sue, B., Valeska, G., Pasternak, D. P., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: Role of collaborating and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6(3), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1891/194589507787382043

Williams, J. (2008). Form-focused instruction. In Hinkel Eli (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-691). New York: Routledge.

Yussof, Y. M., Jamian, A. R., Roslan, S., Hamzah, Z. A., & Kabila, M. K. (2012). Enhancing reading comprehension through cognitive and graphic strategies: A constructive approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.4p.66

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.