“Facebook Me”: The Potential of Student Teachers’ Online Communities of Practice in Learning to Teach

Belinda S. Zimmerman, Sharon D. Kruse, Tricia Niesz, William Kist, Melanie K. Kidder-Brown, Elham Nikbakht


This study examined the ways in which early childhood pre-service student teachers (PSTs) used an online community for discussions related to teaching. Using the lenses of communities of practice, our goal was to understand what happens when the PSTs begin to share new learnings about teaching through ongoing practice in online communities. We investigated characteristics of the conversations of PSTs and their professors when using Facebook. This study was based on the postings of seven early childhood PSTs and five university faculty members. PSTs were interviewed at the conclusion of the semester to share their experiences from posting on Facebook. Two categories from the data include PSTs’ views of the viability of Facebook and the kinds of talk that surfaced within the Facebook group conversations. Findings suggested that Facebook has the potential to sustain informal dialogues. However, PSTs require strong faculty support to solve issues related to complexities of practice.


Communities of Practice, Methods Course Instruction, Online Teaching, Professional Learning Network

Full Text:



Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter Effect: Reading habits and attitudes of teacher

candidates. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554–563.

Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person,

content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39, 525-536.

Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.

Black, R. W. (2007). Digital design: English language learners and reader reviews in online fiction. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (Vol. 29) (pp. 115-136). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chase, S. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women school superintendents. Amherst, MA: University of Mass Press.

Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as new literacy. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (Vol. 29) (pp. 115-136). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(3), 160-172.

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. (2nd Edition). London: The Falmer Press.

Groenke, S.L. (2008). Missed opportunities in cyberspace: Preparing preservice teachers to facilitate critical talk about literature through computer-medicated communication. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 224-233.

Groenke, S.L., Bell, R., Allen, E., & Maples, J. (2011). “What is this thing called a book”: Using Skeleton Creek to transform students’ reading experiences in (and out of) school. English Journal, 100(3), 105-108.

Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M. & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980802588626

Hiebert, J., & Morris, A.K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 92-102.

Iddings, A.C.D., McCafferty, S.G., & Teixeira da Silva, M.L. (2011). Conscientizacao through graffiti literacies in the streets of a Sao Paulo neighborhood: An ecosocial semiotic perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 5-21.

Islam, G. (2008). Bridging two worlds: Identity transition in a university-consulting community of practice. In C. Kimble, P.M. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators, (Vol. 1). (pp. 279-292). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Jaquith, A., Mindich, D., Chung Wei, R., Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher professional learning in the United States: Case studies of state policies and strategies. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.

Kist, W. (2005). New literacies in action: Teaching and learning in multiple media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.

Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K.S. (2009). Building school cultures: A guide to leading change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham:

Open University Press.

Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149-164.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Marzano, R.J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Merchant, G. H. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English teaching: practice and critique, 8(3), 8-20.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review 66(1), 60-92.

Niesz, T. (2010). Chasms and bridges: Generativity in the space between educators’ communities of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 37-44.

Niesz, T. (2007). Why teacher networks (can) work. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(8), 605-610.

Nikbakht, E., & Bosharabadi, A. M. (2015). Analyzing the potential of social networking sites on EFL learners’ vocabulary mastery: A situated-learning approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1635-1641.

Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Schillinger, T. (2011). Blurring boundaries: Two groups of girls collaborate on a wiki. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, pp. 403-413.

Schoen, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, London.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Serrat, O. (2009). A primer on organizational learning. Knowledge Solutions Asian Development Bank, retrieved from http://www.adb.org/documents/information/knowledge-solutions/primer-on-organizational-culture.pdf

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J.A., Chappius, J., & Chappius, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well. Portland, OR: Educational Testing Service.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York, NY: Longman.

Thomas, A. (2005). Children online: Learning in a virtual community of practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 27-38.

Vasinda, S., & McLeod, J. (2011). Extending readers theatre: A powerful and purposeful match with podcasting. The Reading Teacher, 64, 486-497.

Wade, S.E., Fauske, J.R., & Thompson, A. (2008). Prospective teachers’ problem solving in online peer-led dialogues. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 398-442.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Zuidema, L.A. (2012). Making space for informal inquiry: Inquiry as stance in an online induction network. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 132-146.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.2p.62


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.