Cross-cultural Measurement Invariance of the Items in the Science Literacy Test in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA-2015)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education [AERA/APA/NCME]. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Atalay, K., Gök, B., Kelecioğlu, H. & Arsan, N. (2012). Değişen madde fonksiyonunun belirlemesinde kullanılan farklı yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması bir simülasyon çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,43, 270-281.Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunefd/issue/7795/102030
Başusta, N. B. (2013). Differential item functioning analysis of PISA 2006 science achievement test in terms of culture and language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Camilli, G. & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Çepni, Z. (2011). Değişen madde fonksiyonlarının SIBTEST, Mantel Haenzsel, Lojistik Regresyon ve Madde Tepki Kuramı yöntemleriyle incelenmesi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Demirtaşlı, R. N. (2014). Öğrenme, öğretim ve değerlendirme arasındaki ilişkiler. In N. Demirtaşlı (Ed), Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (3-29). Edge Akademi: Ankara
Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
Ercikan, K., Roth, W. M. & Asil, M. (2015). Cautions about inferences from international assessments: The case of PISA 2009. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–28.
Fan, X. & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509-529. doi:10.1080/00273170701382864.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gierl, M. J. (2000). Construct equivalence on translated achievement tests. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(4), 280-296. doi: 10.2307/1585851.
Gierl M. J. & Khaliq S. N. (2001). Identifying sources of differential item and bundle functioning on translated achievement tests: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement; 38(2), 164-187. doi: Gierl, M. H., Khaliq, S. N., & Boughton, K. (1999, June 7-11). Gender differential item functioning in mathematics and science: Prevalence and policy implications. In Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Canada Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cca9/52d14ef16ce1dc1d07ce0caf11609680b85d.pdf
Gök, B., Kelecioğlu, H. & Doğan, N. (2010). Degişen madde fonksiyonunu belirlemede Mantel-Haenzsel ve Lojistik Regresyon tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması. Egitim ve Bilim, 35, 3-16. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/19/28
Grisay, A. (2003). Translation procedures in OECD/PISA 2000 international assessment. Language Testing, 20(2), 225-240. doi:10.1191/0265532203lt254oa
Hambleton, R. K. (2006). Good practices for identifying differential item functioning. Medical Care, 44, 182-188.doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245443.86671.c4
ITC (2005). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation. London: Author.
Johnson, T. P. (1998). Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 3, 1-40. Retrieved from http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/49730
Kamata, A. (2001). Item analysis by the hierarchical generalized linear model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(1), 79-93. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1435439
Kankaras, M. & Moors, G. B. D. (2014). Analysis of cross-cultural comparability of PISA 2009 scores. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(3), 381-399. doi:10.1177/0022022113511297
Le, L. T. (2006, April 7-11). Analysis of differential item functioning. In Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association in San Francisco. Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/files/analysis_of_dif.pdf
Mahler, C. (2011). The effects of misspecifcation type and nuisance variables on the behaviors of population fit indices used in structural equation modeling. B.A: The University of British Columbia.
Niemann, D., Martens, K. & Teltemann, J. (2017). PISA and its consequences: Shaping education policies through international comparisons. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 175-183. doi:10.1111/ejed.12220
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. PISA.Paris: OECD Publications
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. Paris: OECD Publications. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report
Osterlind, S. J. & Everson, H. T. (2009). Differential item functioning. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications.
Pan, T. (2008). Using the multivariate multilevel logistic regression model todetectdıf: a comparison with HGLM and Logistic Regression DIF detection methods (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, Michigan, USA.
Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J. & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 527-529. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.517
Raudenbush, S.W. & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rawls, A. M. W. (2009). The importance of test validity: An examinatıon of measurement ınvariance across subgroups on a reading test (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA.
Shealy, R. T. & Stout, W. F. (1993). An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning. In P. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (197–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sireci, S. G. & Swaminathan, H. (1996, October). Evaluating translation equivalence: So what’s the big DIF? In Annual Meeting of the NortheasternEducational Research Association, Ellenville, NY. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428119.pdf
Sjøberg, S. (2015). PISA and global educational governance–A critique of the project, its uses and implications. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 111-127. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1310a
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S. & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential ıtem functioning with comfirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292- 1306.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Ulutaş, S. (2015). A Study on detecting of differential item functioning of PISA 2006 science literacy items in Turkish and American samples. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 41-60. doi:10.14689/ejer.2015.58.3.
Uzun, N. B. & Gelbal, S. (2017). PISA fen başarı testinin madde yanlılığının kültür ve dil açısından incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(6), 2427-2446. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/363695.
Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the MI literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.doi:10.1177/109442810031002.
Yıldırım, H. H. & Berberoğlu, G. (2009). Judgmental and statistical DIF analyses of the PISA-2003 mathematics literacy items. International Journal of Testing, 9(2), 108-121.doi:10.1080/15305050902880736.
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Psychometrics, 26, 45-79, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B. V
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.2p.16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.