Ethnographic and Case Study Approaches: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis

Lusia Neti Harwati

Abstract


In qualitative methods, there are various approaches that can be used to answer particular social questions, for example ethnography and case study. Two studies conducted by different researchers in China and Australia using these approaches were described and analysed in order to find out their similarities and differences in terms of philosophical and methodological perspectives, in the hope that it will provide an insightful contribution to a critical review of ethnography and case study reports. It is found that the ethnograpic study in China was clasiffied in ethnographic fieldwork, whereas the case study conducted in Australia was categorised in explanatory, multi-cases study. Furthermore, these two studies produced different knowledge within the field of education. The first study revealed that basic education were related to literacy, numeracy, and cultural characteristics of China, whereas the study conducted in Australia offered statistical data that can be used to explain minority languages maintenance program in Wollongong-Shellharbour. In relation to their methodoligal practices, however, focus group discussion and interview conducted in Zhejiang Province, China produced irrelevant data and those had been held in Wollongong, Australia, had limited participants.

Keywords


Qualitative, Ethnography, Case Study, Philosophy, Methodology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burino, A. G., Awan, J. H., & Lanjwani, A. R. (2017). Interview: A Research Instrument for Social Science Researchers. International Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, 1(4) 1-14.

Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press.

Caillaud, S. & Flick, U. (2017). Focus groups in triangulation contexts. In R. Barbour & D. Morgan (Eds.). Advances in Focus Groups Research (pp. 155-177). Hampshire (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.

Cheng, K. M. (2000). Understanding Basic Education Policies in China: An Ethnographic Approach. In Judith Liu, Heidi A. Ross & Donald P. Kelly (Eds.)., The Ethnographic Eye (pp. 34-36), New York: Falmer Press,

Chung, M & Ingleby, R. (2011). Overcoming the Cultural Challenges in Supervising Chinese Research Students in Australia. In China’s Higher Education Reform and Internationalisation (pp. 17-192), England: Routledge, Abingdon.

Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Reseaching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15) 91-100.

Dent, M., Khin, E.W.S., & Ismail, M.N. (2013). Critical and Interpretive Social Science Theory: A Case Study Approach. Actual Problems of Economics, 8(146) 268-275.

Gobo, G. (2011). Ethnographic Methods. Retrieved 27 April 2019, from https://air.unimi.it.

Hallet, R.E & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3) 306-330.

Harrison, H, Birks, M, Franklin, R & Mills, J. (2017). Case Study Research: Foundations and Methodological Orientations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozial Forchung, 18(1) Art. 19.

Kalantzis, M, Cope, B & Slade, D. (1989). Minority Languages and Dominant Culture. New York: Falmer Press.

Mishra, L. (2016). Focus Group Discussion in Qualitative Research. TechnoLEARN, 6(1) 1-5.

Mohajan, H.K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1) 23-48.

Rahamah, N., Bakar, A. & Abdullah, M.Y. (2008). The Life History Approach: Fieldwork Experience. Jurnal e-Bangi, 3(1) 1-9.

Sarantakos, S. (2013). Social Research. 4th Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shakouri, N. (2014). Qualitative Research: Incredulity toward Metanarrativeness. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2) 671-680.

Suryani, A. (2008). Comparing Case Study and Ethnography as Qualitative Research Approaches. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1) 117-128.

Yin, R.K. (2003). Applications of Case Study Research (2nd Edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.