Attitudes to English in the Kaleidoscopic Iranian Context: Second, Foreign or International?

Negar Kiavar, Massoud Yaghoubi-Notash

Abstract


Today’s world seems to be quite overwhelmingly concerned with communication as an incontestable aspect of which is communicating with people lacking a shared linguistic background. A common language (or lingua franca) would, therefore, be needed which can cut across all local, national, and regional linguistic boundaries. This study aimed at exploring the attitudes of 400 bilingual and monolingual college students and EFL learners. It investigated English language status in the linguistically diverse context of Iran. For the purpose of the study, a standardized questionnaire containing 37 Likert-type items was distributed. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis revealing that learners from different linguistic backgrounds had significantly different reactions and attitudes to the issues such as: General perception to English, Status of English, text and content matter comprehensibility through English, job prospects, official status, culture learning, integrating with American or British cultures, religion and foreign language learning, English ownership, Adherence to British English, American English or English as an international language.

Keywords


Attitude, English as Foreign Language, Multinational Englishes, Ownership of English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadi, H. T. H., & Darani, L. H. (2015). Exploring Male and Female Iranian EFL Learners’ Attitude towards Native and Non-native Varieties of English. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 124-145. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.ensani.ir/storage/Files/20170121152157-10099-156.pdf

Aliakbari, M. (2003). Linguistic imperialism, linguistic democracy and English language Teaching. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Universities in Asia. Chulalongkon University Press, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.stc.arts.chula.ac.th/ITUA/Papers_for_ITUA_Proceedings/Linguistic%20Imperialism.pdf

Attitude. (2017). In Merriam Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attitude.

Azam, M., Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2013). The returns to English-language skills in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 335-367. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp4802.pdf

Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Calder, B. J., & Lutz, R. J. (1972). An investigation of some alternatives to the linear attitude model. In SV - Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, eds. M. Venkatesan, Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research, 812-815.

Cook, V. (2004). Bilingual cognition and teaching. Paper presented at the 13th International Symposium on English Teaching, Taipei, TW.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (1999) The future of Englishes. English Today, 15, 10-20. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400010816

Culture. (2017). In Merriam Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture

Dewi, A. (2011). Perception of English: a study of staff and students at universities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (doctoral dissertation) Monash University, Australia

Egbert, J., Huff, L., McNeil, L., Preuss, C., & Sellen, J. (2009). Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology‐enhanced language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 754-768.

Faez, F. (2011). Reconceptualizing the native/nonnative speaker dichotomy. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(4), 231-249. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.598127

Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Arts, Logic and conversation (pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic press.

Gumperz, J. (1982). Language and Social Identity, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Explorations in the functions of language. North-Holland, NL, Elsevier.

Hult, F. M. (2012). English as a transcultural language in Swedish policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 230-257. doi: 10.1002/tesq.19

Identity. (2017). In Merriam Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/identity

Jackson, J. (2011). Mutuality, engagement, and agency: Negotiating identity on stays abroad. Identity formation in globalizing contexts: Language learning in the new millennium, 127-145. doi: 10.1515/9783110267280.127

Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A resource book for students. London, Routledge.

Kachru, B. B. (Ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. University of Illinois Press.

Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H.G. Widdowson (Eds), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp.11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lauring, J. (2008). Rethinking social identity theory in international encounters: Language use as a negotiated object for identity making. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(3), 343-361. doi: 10.1177/1470595808096673

Lester, M. (1978). International English and language variation. In English as an international language. London: The British Council.

Liaw, M. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning and Technology, 10 (3), 49-64. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/liaw/

Liou, Y. S. (2010). Who wants EIL? Attitudes towards English as an international language: A comparative study of college teachers and students in the Greater Taipei area. College English: Issues and Trends, 3, 133-157.

Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 321-339. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400197

Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D., & Welch, L. (1999). Adopting a common corporate language: IHRM implications. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 377-390. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095851999340387

Martínez, D. U., & Pérez, J. G. (2013). Attitudes of Mexican American students towards learning English as a Second Language in a structured immersion Program. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 20, 205-221.

Matsuda, A. (2003). The ownership of English in Japanese secondary schools. World Englishes, 22(4), 483-496. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2003.00314.x

McKenna, S. (2004). The intersection between academic literacies and student identities: research in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 18(3), 269-280. doi: 10.4314/sajhe.v18i3.25496

Menard–Warwick, J., Heredia–Herrera, A., & Palmer, D. S. (2013). Local and global identities in an EFL Internet chat exchange. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 965-980. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12048.x

Modiano, M. (1999a). International English in the global village. English Today, 15(2), 22-27. doi: 10.1017/S026607840001083X

Nakayama, Y. (1989). Some suggestions for multinational Englishes: A sociolinguistic view of the language. JALT Journal, 11(1), 26-35.

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Buenos Aires, AR: Editorial Dunken.

Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994) The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.

Paikeday, T. M. (1985). The native speaker is dead! An informal discussion of a linguistic myth with Noam Chomsky and other linguists, philosophers, psychologists, and lexic. Toronto and New York, Paikeday Pub Co.

Parmegiani, A. (2014). The (dis) ownership of English: language and identity construction among Zulu students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(6), 683-694. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.953775

Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. (2012). Language policies and practices in wholly owned foreign subsidiaries: A recontextualization perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 808-833. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42745-4_5

Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (2008). The new linguistic imperial order: English as an EU lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia?. Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies, 1(2), 189-203. Retrieved from http://www.serwis.wsjo.pl/lektor/1783/R20%20Phillipson%202008%20English%20in%20EU%20lingua%20frankensteinia.pdf

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard language. English Today, 21, 3-10.

Quirk, R. (1981). International communication and the concept of nuclear English. In English for cross-cultural communication (pp. 151-165). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Riazi, A (2005) ‘The four language stages in the history of Iran’, In A. Lin & P. Martin (Eds.), Decolonization, Globalisation: Language-in-education Policy and Practice (pp. 98-114), United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.

Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy: From a national to a transnational paradigm. United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.

Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: an example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(4), 419-434. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1080714

Selinker, L. (1992). Rediscovering interlanguage. London: Longman.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 209-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Sharifian, F. (Ed.). (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.

Smith, L. E. (2015). English as an international language: No room for linguistic chauvinism. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 4(1), 165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2015-0002

Smith, L.E. (1978). Some distinctive features of EIIL vs. ESOL in English language education. Culture Learning Institute Report, 5(3), 5-7 and 10-11.

Sugimoto, T., Rahimpour, M., & Yaghoubi-Notash, M. (2006). Exploring the role of attitude, motivation and gender in EFL learning. The Seijo University Arts & Literature Quarterly, 197, 138-154. Retrieved from http://www.seijo.ac.jp/pdf/falit/197/197-5.pdf

Tsuda, S. (2003). Attitudes toward English Language Learning in Higher Education in Japan (2): Raising Awareness of the Notion of Global English. Global English-Oriented Research Journal (GEORJ), 7(3), 61-75.

Valdes, J. M. (Ed.). (1986). Culture bound: Bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Yu, Y. (2010). Attitudes of learners toward English: A case of Chinese college students (Doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University, China.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.