Students and Teachers’ Perceptions into the Viability of Mobile Technology Implementation to Support Language Learning for First Year Business Students in a Middle Eastern University

Bilal M. Tayan


Advancements in technology have enabled us to learn, adapt and exploit our skills and knowledge in new ways.  Appreciating the potential of technology may yet give growth and enrich the process of language education, particularly through a student-centred mobile learning environment. Consequently, a constructivist approach to learning can create tremendous possibilities for both language learners and teachers. By exploiting the affordances of mobile technologies and the Internet, a new platform of learning or Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) can be realised, through which learners truly learn to learn.  Yet, while many of today’s language institutions and places of learning have begun to understand the potential presented by mobile technology as a tool and resource to content and language development, apprehension may still exist among educational practitioners, learners and senior management.  Such apprehension may stem from a lack of understanding in fully appreciating the opportunities and affordances posed by MALL in creating a support structure to learning and teaching excellence. This may be particularly true within developing countries such as those found in the Middle East. Consequently, set in a Saudi university context, the purpose of this study is to investigate learners’ and teachers’ perceptions towards the proposed implementation of a MALL programme, while exploring whether the promotion of mobile technologies could assist learning and become a viable support structure in teaching English as a second language.  Interviews were conducted with three English instructors who teach on the first year Business English programme at the university. The study also analysed 191 student participants who completed a Likert scale questionnaire designed to explore their mobile learning experiences, attitudes and perceptions towards the proposed MALL programme in their educational context. The findings from the student questionnaire and teacher interviews generally highlight positive attitudes and a receptiveness towards mobile learning implementation. This is perhaps due to the possibility of new pedagogical scaffoldings being created through MALL in their learning/teaching environment. The results further highlighted opportunities MALL presented in facilitating communication and affording learners greater motivation to engage in independent learning, thus facilitating learner autonomy and allowing for greater collaboration within a richer learner environment. However, while analysis highlighted a proposed MALL implementation could be a useful tool to support language acquisition for ESP/ESL learners (English for Specific Purposes/English as a Second Language), technical issues, network sustainability and comprehensive training were still significant factors of concern.



Mobile Assisted Language Learning, Perceptions, Viability, Saudi Arabia

Full Text:



Al-Fahad, F. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 8(2), 111-119.

Almekhlafi, A. (2006). The effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on United Arab English as a Foreign Language (EFL) School Students’ Achievements and Attitude. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 121-142.

Al-Zahrani, A. (2015). The Impact of Flipped Classroom on Cognitive Achievement in eLearning Course among Students from the Faculty of Education at King Abdulaziz University [Arabic]. The Journal of the Faculty of Education at the University of Al-Azhar, 162(1).

Baek, Y., Jung, J. & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers and Education, 5(1), 224-234.

Bax. S. (2003). CALL- past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.

Brown, J. (2001), Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buckenmayer, J. (2011). Revisiting teacher adoption of technology: Research implications and recommendations for successful technology integration. College Teaching Methods and Styles Journal, 4(6), 7-10.

Carpenter, B. S. (2009). Virtual worlds as educational experience: Living and learning in interesting times. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1), 1-4.

Cook, V. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Hodder Press.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Farmer, L. (2008). Learning on the Move: Making Technology Appealing to Girls. CSLA Journal, 32(1), 19-21.

Fouts, J. (2000). Research on computers and education: Past, present and future. Seattle: Seattle Pacific University.

Geddes, S. J. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefits to learners (online), Knowledge Tree e-journal, 30(3), 214-228. Retrieved on 16/09/2016 from

Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. London: Teachers College Press.

Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393-415.

Hwang, G., Wang, S., & Lai, C. L. (2015). Seamless flipped learning- a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473.

Jiang, W., & Ramsay, G. (2005). Rapport-building through CALL in teaching Chinese as a foreign language: An exploratory study. Language Learning & Technology, 9 (2), 47-63.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning, ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.

Kukulska-Hulme and Shield, A., & Sharples, M. (2016). Waypoints along learning journeys in a mobile world. In W. Ng & T.M. Cummings (Eds), Sustaining mobile learning: theory, research and practice (pp. 43-56). New York: Routledge.

Kidd T. & Keengwe J. (eds.) (2010), Adult Learning in the Digital Age, Hershey: Information Science Reference.

Koszalka, T. A. & Ntloedibe-Kuswani, G. (2010). Literature on the safe and disruptive learning potential of mobile technologies. Distance Education, 31(2), 139-157.

Lai, C., Yang, J., Chen, F., Ho, C., & Chan, T. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experimental learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 326-337.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levy, M. (2005). Why Call CALL ‘CALL’? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 143-149.

Liao, C. L. (2008). Avatars, second life, and new media art: The challenge of contemporary art education. Art Education, 61(2), 87-91.

Looi, C., Wong, L., So, H., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, B., Norris, C. & Soloway E. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilised lesson: Learning my way. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1120-1132.

Loyens, M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36, 351-357.

Lu, L. R (2008). Art cafe: A 3d virtual learning environment for art education. Art Education, 61(6), 48-53.

Lugo, M. T. and Schurmann, S. 2012. Turning on Mobile Learning in Latin America: Illustrative Initiatives and Policy Implications (online). Paris, UNESCO. Retrieved on 16/09/2016 from

Marinakou, E. and Giousmpasoglou, C. (2014). M-Learning in higher education in Bahrain: The educators’ view. Paper for the 6th e-learning Excellence in the Middle East Conference – Leadership, Design and Technology for the 21st Centure Learning, Dubai, 3-5 March.

McKinsey & Company. (2017). Transforming learning through mEducation. Accessed on 08/11/2017 from:

Motiwalla, L. (2007). Mobile Learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers and Education, 49(3), 581-596.

Muir-Herzig, R. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers and Education, 24(2), 97-104.

Mustafa, Z. (2001). Non-courseware factors involved in using multimedia in foreign language instruction, Grazer Linguistiche Studien, 55(1), 39-50.

MyEnglishLab (2016). MyEnglishLab, Pearson (online). Retrieved on 16/06/2016 from

Myers, K. M., & Wilson, B. G. (2000). Situated Cognition in Theoretical and Practical Context. In D. Jonassen, & S. M. Land, Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 57-88). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Norton, B. (2000), Identity and language learning. Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Pearson.

Omale, N., Hung, W., Luetkehans, L. & Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2009). Learning in 3-D multiuser virtual environments: Exploring the use of unique 3-D attributes for online problem based learning, British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 480-495.

Orr, G. (2010). A Review of Literature in Mobile Learning: Affordances and Constraints. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (WMUTE), 107-111. IEEE.

Proctor, N., & Burton, J. (2003) Tate modern multimedia tour pilots 2002-2003, In J. Attewell, G. Da Bormida, M. Sharples, & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.) M Learn 2003: Learning with mobile devices (p. 54-55) London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

Rau, P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure and learning performance. Computers and Education. 50(1), 1-22.

Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Price, S., Smith, H., Muller, H., Randal, C., Moss, A., Taylor, I., Stanton, D., O’Malley, C., Corke, G., & Gabriella, S. (2002). Learning through digitally-augmented physical experiences: Reflections on the Ambient Wood project (online). Retrieved on 29/09/2016 from

Robertson, E. B., Ladewig, B. H., Strickland, M. P., & Boschung, M. D. (1987). Enhancement of self-esteem through the use of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 314-316.

Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazelwood, W. and Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sense making. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111-124.

Rosi Solė, C., Calic, J. & Neijman, D. (2010). A social and self-reflective approach to MALL. ReCall, 22(1), 39-52.

Sarrab, M., Al Shibli, I. & Badursha, N. (2016). An Empirical Study of Factors Driving the Adoption of Mobile Learning in Omani Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17 (4), 331-349.

Sharples, M. (2007). Introduction to Special Issue of JCAL on mobile e-learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 23(4), 283-284.

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. University of Birmingham, UK. Retrieved from

Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The Future of Mobile Learning: Implications for Policy Makers and Planners. Paris: UNESCO.

So, H., Kim, I & Looi, C. (2008). Seamless Mobile learning: Possibilities and Challenges Arising from the Singapore Experience. Educational Technology International. 9 (2), 97-121.

Statista (2016). Smart phone users in Saudi Arabia (online). Retrieved on 07/11/2016 from

Stevenson, J., and Gross, S. (1991). Use of a Computerized Adaptive Testing Model for ESOL/Bilingual Entry/Exit Decision Making. Computer Assisted Language Learning and Testing, 223-235.

Stratham, D. S., & Torell, C. R. (1996). Computers in the classroom: The impact of technology on student learning. Indiana: Army Research Institute.

Soloway,E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx,R. (2001) Logon education: handheld devices are ready at hand, Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.

Tan, E. & So, H. (2015). Rethinking the Impact of Activity Design on a Mobile Learning Trail: The Missing Dimension of the Physical Affordances. IEEE Learning Technology, 8(1), 98-100.

Taylor, R. (1980). Computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. London: Teachers College Press.

Taylor, P. G. (2009). Can we move beyond visual metaphors? Virtual world provocations and second life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1), 4-7.

Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2002). M-Learning in transit. In P. Lewis (Ed.), The changing face of CALL (p. 229-243). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a Mobile Age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.

Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N. & Ercag, E. (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers and Education, 52(2), 381-389.

Vavoula, G., Pachler, N. & Kukulska-Hulme and Shield A. (2009). Researching mobile learning: Framework, tools and research designs. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing.

Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 453-475.

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 15-25). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wu, L. & Looi, C-K. (2012). Agent prompts: Scaffolding for productive reflection in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 339-353.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.