Iranian EAP Practitioners' Attitudes toward and Familiarity with CALL: A Case at Guilan University

Hassan Soleimani, Amin Khanjani


In recent years, the field of foreign language teaching and learning has witnessed increasing interest in the use of computer in education. Among various factors affecting the successful implementation of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in the educational contexts, teachers' attitudes and familiarity with CALL plays indispensable role. Hence, the present study tried to shed some light on these issues and reveal potential barriers for such implementations. To this aim, a questionnaire and a semi–structured interview were developed for the 20 EAP practitioners at Guilan University in Iran. The results indicated that, in general, there were positive attitudes regarding computer technology but the practitioners' familiarity with the technology was a bit unsatisfactory. Moreover, some problems on CALL implementation were identified and possible solutions were suggested. One of the principal problems detected was the inadequacy of teacher training programs in Iran. .It was suggested that implementing CALL successfully not only requires a paradigm shift in the teacher training programs but also demands the incorporation of policy makers and the governors for such implementation.



CALL, computer familiarity, EAP, attitudes, computer technology

Full Text:



Ademola, O.R. (2009). Influence of computer anxiety and knowledge on computer utilization of senior secondary school students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7 (3), 1269-1288.

Atai, M. R., & Dashtestani, R. (2013). Iranian English for Academic Purposes (EAP) stakeholders’ attitudes toward using the internet in EAP courses for civil engineering students: promises and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26 (1), 21-38.

Ataran, A. & Nami, K. (2011).Examining acceptance of information technology: a longitudinal study of Iranian high school teachers. 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering. Singapore: IPEDR.IACSIT Press.

Askari Arani, J. ( 2004). The effect of ICT-based teaching method on medical students' ESP learning. Journal of Medical Education, 4 (2), 81- 83.

Bax, S. (2003). CALL –past, present and future, System, 31(1), 13–28.

Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers’ attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 4(3), 179-206.

Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Chapelle, C. & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). The English language teacher in the 21st century. In Fotos, S.& Browne, C. (Eds.), New Perspectives in CALL for Second Language classrooms. (pp. 299-316). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dashtestani, R. (2012). Barriers to the implementation of CALL in EFL courses: Iranian EFL teachers’ attitudes and perspectives. The Jalt CALL Journal, 8 (2), 55-70.

Ellis, R. (2001). Second language acquisition: Research and language pedagogy. In Candlin, C. N. & Mercer, N. (2001) (eds), English language teaching in its social context. (pp. 44-75). New York: Macquarie.

Fardy, M., NooriShorabi, H., & Mohammadi, Y. (2012). The effect of using Computer- Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on the reading comprehension of narrative texts for the Iranian University male freshmen. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(1), 292-300.

Gorsuch, G. (2000). EFL educational policies and educational cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 675-710.

Griffin, J. (1988). CAL Innovation as viewed by purchasers of computer software in secondary schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 4(3), 150-161.

Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching- language in action. New York: Routledge.

Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2006).Teacher education in CALL. Philadelphia: John Benjamin's Publishing Co.

Jung, U. (2005). CALL –past, present and future: a bibliometric approach. ReCALL, 17(1), 4–17.

Khanifar, H. ,Bordbar, H., Seraji, R ,Ismaeily, M. ,NikAeen,, M. & Atayi, M. ( 2012). Recognition of Access to Educational Technologies in theEducational System of Iran.Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (7), 7382-7392.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006).Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.

Lamy, M. & Hampel, R. ( 2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lewis, G. (2009). Bringing technology into the classroom. Oxford: OUP.

Maftoon, P. &Shahini, A. (2012). CAL Lnormalization : a survey on inhibitive factors. The Jalt CALL Journal, 8 (1), 17-32.

Park, C. N., & Son, J.-B. (2009). Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80–101.

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. & Leong L.M. ( 2012). EFL teachers' attitudes toward using computer technology in English language teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 630-636.

Rahimi, M. &Yadollahi, S. (2012). Multivariate effects of level of education, computer ownership, and computer use on female students’ attitudes towards CALL. English Language Teaching, 5 (4), 108- 115.

Talebinezhad, M.R. & Azizi Abarghoui, M. (2013). The Iranian high school students’ attitude toward CALL and the use of CALL for EFL receptive skills. Theory and Practice inLanguage Studies, 3(2), 329-337.

Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview.Language Teaching Research, 31(2), 57–71.

Warschauer, M. ( 2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (3), 453- 475.

Wood, E., Muller, J., Laurier, W. ,Willoughby, T.,Specht, J., & Deyoung,T.( 2005).Teachers’ perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom.Education, Communication & Information, 5(2),183- 206.

Yaghmaei, P., Schiffauerova, A. &Yaghmaei, F. (2012). Development of Iranian computer attitude scale. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE).

Yaghoubi, J., Malekmohammadi, I. ,Iravani, H. ,Attaran, M. & Gheidi, A. ( 2008) .Virtual students' perceptions

of E- learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 7(3), 89- 95.

Yushau, B. (2006). Computer attitude, use, experience, software familiarity and perceived pedagogical usefulness: the case of mathematics professors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-17.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.