The Relationship between Ethnic Group Affiliation (EGA) and Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in English among Undergraduates in a Public University in Malaysia

Fatin Nabila Abd Razak, Vahid Nimehchisalem, Ain Nadzimah Abdullah

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the relationship between ethnic group affiliation (EGA) and Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in English among the undergraduates in a public university in Malaysia. The three ethnic groups involved in the study were Malays, Chinese, and Indians. An EGA questionnaire was adapted from Phinney (1992), Magid (2004), and Gatbonton and Trofimovich (2008), while a WTC questionnaire was adapted from McCroskey (1992), Fishman (1972), and Granhemat (2015). The questionnaires were distributed to 39 participants representing the three major races. The analysis showed that the level of EGA for the Malays was the highest with 83% as compared to the Chinese with 73% and the Indians with 81%. Meanwhile, the level of WTC of the Chinese received the highest score of 75%, while the Malays and the Indians were at 63%. Results of the Pearson Correlation, r= -0.323, p= 0.045, indicated a significantly weak and negative association between EGA and WTC. This implicated that high levels of EGA would result in low levels of WTC. Hence, in addressing that, attention needs to be given to the aspect of EGA in language learning and teaching approaches in order to achieve better language proficiency among the English language learners in Malaysia.

Keywords


Ethnic Group Affiliation (EGA), Willingness to Communicate (WTC)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayfer S. B. (2016). The influence of willingness to communicate on overall speaking skills among EFL learners Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.043

Baghaei, P. (2012). The relationship between willingness to communicate and success in learning English as a foreign language. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 53–67.

Bourhis, R. (1977). Giles, H., Bourhis, R.Y. & Taylor, D.M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.). Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 307–348). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.

Fishman J. A. (1972). Language in sociocultural change (Essays by Joshua A. Fishman, selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gatbonton, E., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). The ethnic group affiliation and L2 proficiency link: Empirical evidence. Language Awareness, 17, 229–248.

Gatbonton E., Trofimovich P., & Magid M. (2005). Learners’ ethnic group affiliation and L2 pronunciation accuracy: A sociolinguistic investigation. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 489–511.

Gatbonton E., & Hinenoya K. (2000). Ethnocentrism, cultural traits, beliefs, and English proficiency: A Japanese sample. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 225–240.

Granhemat, M. (2015). Language choice and use among undergraduates at a Malaysian public university (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Gumperz, J. J., & Cook-Gumperz, J. (1982). Language, culture and miscommunication. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, 91, 6–24. http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/anthpubs/ucb/text/kas091-003.pdf

Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70. http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/uhwpesl/on-line_cat.html

Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38, 161 –171.

Macintyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.

Macintyre, P. D., MacMaster, K., & Baker, S. C. (2001). The convergence of multiple models of motivation for second language learning: Gardner, Pintrich, Kuhl, and McCroskey. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 461-492). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.

MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11, 135–142.

Magid, M. (2004). The attitudes of Chinese people towards fluent Chinese second language speakers of English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Concordia University.

McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.

McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 25–26.

Mohammad-Hadi Mahmoodi, M.H., & Moazam, I. (2014). Willingness to communicate (WTC) and L2 achievement: The case of Arabic language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.518

Noels, K. A., & Giles, H. (2009). Social identity and language learning. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), New handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 647–670). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald.

Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=yBa32AqtwB8C

Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(2), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489272003

Trofimovich, P., & Turuseva, L. (2015). Ethnic identity and second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 234–252. https://doi:10.1017/S0267190514000166

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.6p.207

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.