Accounting Theory Lenses to Analyze Literature: An Exploration through Shakespeare’s Macbeth

Patrice Gélinas, Camilia Gélinas, Lisa Baillargeon


The present study is the first of its kind to suggest that accounting theory lenses can be a powerful tool to understand literary works, such as a diegesis. Using Shakespeare’s Macbeth as exploratory setting, we propose a metaphorical abstraction process to translate and analyze characters and currencies. We then illustrate the effectiveness of an accounting theoretical framework to analyze a sample of play events which allude to its finality. The main contribution of this paper is to illustrate how the work of literature and accounting theorists can be mutually illuminating.


Shakespeare, Accounting Theory, Interdisciplinary Approaches In Literature, New Economic Criticism

Full Text:



Amariglio, J. (1990). Economics as a postmodern discourse. In Economics as discourse: An analysis of the language of economists. Ed. Samuels, W.J. Boston: Kluwer, 15–46.

Avery, H.G. (1953). Accounting as a language. The Accounting Review 28(1) 83-87.

Ball, R. (2009). Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals. Journal of Accounting Research 47, 277–323. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00325.x

Burgstahler, D. & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1), 99-126.

Deegan, C.M. (2014). Financial accounting theory. 4th ed. North Ryde, N.S.W. McGraw-Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd, 625 p.

Dobski, B.J. & Gish, D.A. (2011). Souls with longing: Representations of honor and love in Shakespeare. Lexington Books. 332 p.

Erikson, M., Hanlon, M. & Maydew, E.L. (2006). Is there a link between executive equity incentives and accounting fraud? Journal of Accounting Research 44(1), 113-143.

Fogel, K. (2006). Oligarchic family control, social economic outcomes, and the quality of government. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 603-622.

Healy, P.M. & Wahlen, J.M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4, December), 365-383.

Healy, P.M. &. Palepu, K.G. (2003). The fall of Enron. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(2), 3-26.

Heinzelman, K. (1980). The economics of the imagination. Amherst University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 236 p.

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kapur, S. & Mohanty P. (2014). Lessons from literature: Blending academic perspective with management practices, Advances in Language and Literary Studies 5(5), 233-238.

Karpoff, J., Lee, D. & Martin, G. (2008). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3), 581-611. doi:10.1017/S0022109000004221

Kaufmann, D. (1995). The business of common life: Novels and classical economics between revolution and reform. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Klamer, A., McCloskey D.N. & Solow, R.M., eds. (1988). The consequences of economic rhetoric. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Korda, N. (2009). Dame usury: Gender, credit, and (ac)counting in the sonnets and "The Merchant of Venice". Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 60(2, Summer), 129-153.

McCloskey, D.N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Pacioli, L. (1494). Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioni et proportionalita; distintio nona-tranctatus XI, particularis de computis et scripturis. Paganino de Paganini, Venice. Translated by Brown, R.G. & Johnston, K.S. (1963), Paciolo on accounting.

Pigou, A. C. (1917). The value of money. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 32(1), 38–65.

Purdy, A., ed. (1993). Literature and money. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.

Raman, S. (2005). Marking time: Memory and market in "The Comedy of Errors". Shakespeare Quarterly 56(2, Summer), 176-205.

Resnick, S. & Wolff, R. 1988. Marxian theory and the rhetorics of economics. In The consequences of economic rhetoric. Ed. Klamer A., McCloskey, D.N. and Solow, R.M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–63.

Rossi-Landi, F. (1975). Linguistics and economics. The Hague: Mouton.

Sangster, A., Stoner, G.N., & McCarthy P.A. (2007). Lessons for the classroom from Luca Pacioli. Issues in Accounting Education 22(3), 447-457.

Sangster, A. (2016). The genesis of double entry bookkeeping. The Accounting Review 91(1), 299–315.

Schrand, C. M. & Zechman, S.L.C. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 311-329.

Shakespeare, W. (1600). The merchant of Venice. London.

Shakespeare, W. (2009). Macbeth, Ed. Bate, J. & Rasmussen, E., The Modern Library, New York, 190 p.

Shell, M. (1978). The economy of literature. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 176 p.

Shell, M. (1982). Money, language and thought: Literary and philosophical economies from the medieval to the modern era. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Shell, M. (1995). Art and Money. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Sheppard, J. (1994). The corporate moral person: The organization’s personality and its board. Journal of Business & Society 7(2), 151-164

Solow, R. M. (1988). Comments from inside economics. In The consequences of economic rhetoric. Ed. Klamer, A., McCloskey, D.N. & Solow, R.M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31-37.

Watson, C. B. (1960). Shakespeare and the renaissance concept of honor. Princeton University Press. 490p.

Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J.L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall.

West, C. (2016). The merchant of Venice/William Shakespeare. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Woodbridge, L. (2003). Money and the age of Shakespeare: Essays in new economic criticism, Palgrave MacMillan, England.

Woodmansee, M. & Osteen, M. (1999). The new economic criticism: Studies at the intersection of literature and economics. Routledge, London and New York.

Zang, A. Y. (2011). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, Vol. 87(2), 675-703.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2018 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.