The Effect of Higher Order Thinking Skill Instruction on EFL Reading Ability

Nava Nourdad, Sanam Masoudi, Parisa Rahimali

Abstract


This quantitative and quasi-experimental study dealt with the effect of the teaching higher order thinking (HOT) on the reading comprehension ability of foreign language learners. Since reading ability plays a crucial role in learners’ education, it is language teachers’ mission to be aware of the useful and beneficial strategies to improve their students’ reading comprehension ability. Considering the fruitful results of applying HOT skills in education, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of their instruction on students’ reading comprehension ability. To achieve the objectives of the study, a group of 236 male and female university students majoring in various fields but all taking General English course was selected by convenience sampling. They were randomly assigned into two groups of control and experimental. PET test was applied to homogenize the participants of the two study groups. The study followed pre-test, treatment, post-test design. While the experimental group followed a nine-session treatment on strategies of HOT, the control group was instructed through conventional method determined by the course book. The results of independent samples t-test revealed the positive effect of teaching HOT skills on improving reading comprehension ability of adult EFL learners. Pedagogical implications of these findings for language learners, language teachers, course book developers, and educational policy makers are discussed.


Keywords


Higher order thinking, reading comprehension, Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy, critical thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahiri, J., Dunifa, L., Tanduklangi, A., & Ghani, A. (2013). The effect of learning strategies on Higher-Order Thinking skills students with different learning styles. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(9), 1204-1211.

Anderson, N.J. (2006). Crossing borders through reading. Selected papers from the fifth International symposium on English Teaching. Taipei, Crane.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David MC Kay Company, Inc.

Chinedu, C., Olabiyi, O., & Kamin, Y. (2015). Strategies for improving higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. Journal of technical education and training, 7(2), 35-43.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current development in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 375-406.

Grigaite, D. (2005). Developing Child's thinking Skills by semantic Mapping Strategies. CEEOL Trames: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus.

Jerald, C.D. (2009). Defining a 21st Century Education. Center for Public Education.

Retrieved in December, 2017 from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Learn-About/21st-Century/Defining-a-21st-Century-Education-Full-Report-PDF.pdf

Larson, L.C., & Miller. T.N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121-123.

Lateef, A., Dahar, M.A., & Latif, Kh. (2016). Impact of higher order thinking skills of university students on their academic performance. Pakistan Association of Anthropology, 28(2), 2031-2035.

Masoudi, S. (2018). A content-based analysis of the activities in Iranian senior high school textbook. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of Tabriz. Tabriz: Iran.

McNeil, R. C. (2011). A program evaluation model: using Bloom’s taxonomy to identify outcome indicators in outcomes- based program evaluations. Journal of adult education, 40(2), 24-29.

Nourdad, N. (2015). Responses to mediation for six levels of reading comprehension questions based on bloom’s taxonomy. The Iranian EFL journal, 11(3), 94-111.

Phillips, J.A. (2004). Keberkesanan pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: perubahan kepada system persekolahan. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir: Tinjauan Kejayaan Satu Dekad.

Rahimali, P. (2018). Comparing reflective thinking ability of EFL learners in language institutes and schools. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of Tabriz. Tabriz: Iran.

Raymond, C.J. (2006). Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension. Received at March 2017 from http://www.readingquest.org/strat/graphic.html.

Sanders, M. (2001). Understanding Dyslexia and Reading Process: A Guide for Educators and Parents. Needham Heights 'MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Teemant, A., & Hausman, C. S. (2016). Quasi-experimental evidence of critical sociocultural pedagogy. Manuscript in preparation.

The Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2007). 21st century curriculum and instruction. Retrieved in July 2017, from http://www.p21.org/news-events/press-releases/360-partnership-for-21st-century-skills-releases-updated-framework-for-21st-century-learning.

Tomei, Laurence. (2005). Taxonomy for the technology Domain. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

Venville, G., Adey, P., Larkin, S., & Robertson, A. (2003). Fostering thinking through science in the early years of schooling. International journal of science education, 25(11), 1313-1331.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.231

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.