The Comparative Effect of Student Team-Achievement Division and Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition on EFL Learners’ Speaking Complexity

Zeinab Ghasemi, Abdollah Baradaran

Abstract


The effectiveness of complexity acquisition to enhance intermediate learners’ speaking complexity, is particularly the focus of the present study. The participants of the present study, were 60 female EFL learners, who were selected from a larger population of 90 EFL learners based on their performane on a sample piloted PET test in Zabansara Language Institution. The total of 60 participants were divided into two experimental groups of 30. The experimental group of STAD (Student Team-Achievement Division), and the experimental group of CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition), which were both regarded as cooperative methods. The 10-session treatment, included focusing on complexities using STAD cooperative method instruction in one experimental group, and CIRC in the other. A post-test was administered to both groups at the end of the treatment,after applying the mentioned cooperative methods. The statistical analyses were conducted, and the gained results of the study indicated that CIRC had a significant influence on learners’ complexity learning. It concluded the importance of applying appropriate complexities in EFL context to developing speech naturalness.


Keywords


Student Team-Achievement Division (STAD), Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Speaking Complexity, Cooperative Learning (CL), EFL Learner

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adesoji, F. A., & Ibraheem, T. L. (2009). Effects of student team-achievement divisions strategy and mathematics knowledge on learning outcomes in chemical kinematics. Journal of International Social Research, 2(6), 15-25.

Arends, R. I. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains,NY: Longman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Durukan, E. (2010). Effects of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition technique on Reading-Writing skills. Academic Journal, 6(1), 102-109.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.

Feichtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1991). Why some groups fail: A survey of students’ experiences with learning groups. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 75-88.

Jeremy Harmer.(2015). The practice of English Language Teaching: Pearson.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn& Bacon.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn& Bacon.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1985). Relationships between black and white students in intergroup cooperation and competition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(4), 421-428.

Kagan, S. (1986). Cooperative learning and sociological factor in schooling in Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority students. Los Angeles, CA: California State University Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative learning.

Khan, G. N., & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effects of students team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of studies. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 211-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n12p211

Killen, R (2007). Effective Teaching Strategies for OBE Teaching. 2nd Edition. Boston: Social science press.

O'keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and communication, 191, 225.

Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.

Rashidi, N, & Najafi, R. (2010). A study of the representation of Culture in Iran Language Institute Advanced Level Textbooks.

Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. (2008). Moving Beyond the plateau. From intermediate to advanced levels in language learning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rimani Nikou, F., Bonyadi, A., & Ebrahimi, K. (2014). The effect of student team-achievement division (STAD) on language achievement of Iranian EFL students across gender. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 3(4), 936-949.

Sharan, Y. (2014). Learning to cooperate for cooperative learning. Anales De Psicologia, 30(3), 802-807.

Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.

Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using student team learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

Slavin, R.E (2010). Co-operative Learning What Makes Group work. In Dumont H, Istance D, and Benavides F (Eds.), The Nature of Learning Using Research to Inspire Practice. (pp. 161-178). Paris, France OECD.

Tang, J. (2013). Input of chunks and its effects on L2 Learners’ listening competency. Theories and practice in language studies, 3(7), 1264-1269.

Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85-92.

Tran, V. D. (2014). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Academic Achievement and Knowledge Retension. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131-140

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language in computer-supported communication: Theory meets reality. Language Awareness, 11(2), 114-131.

Zarei, A. (2012). The Effects of STAD and CIRC on L2 Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3(2), 161-173.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.67

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.