The Irony of the Ballad Form in Keats’s “La Belle Dame sans Merci”
Abstract
Although critics commenting on Keats’s “La Belle Dame sans Merci” are divided on whether or not the poem is autobiographical, the genre of the poem as a “ballad” tends to be given short shrift in their critical interpretations, and its role in determining the meaning of the poem is largely left unexplored. Taking into account the fact that a traditional ballad is an impersonal detached mode of poem, and that a lyric is a rather subjective composition displaying the poet’s thoughts and sentiments, one would expect that Keats’s utilization of the formal features of the traditional ballad genre, including a detached, impersonal mode of writing, would rule out lyrical or autobiographical interpretations. However, reading the poem against the grain (of its ballad form), this article argues that Keats’s deployment of the ballad genre conventions does not actually preclude autobiographical interpretations, but, on the contrary, it endorses them. For Keats’s poem is lyrical and personal in nature and his use of the conventions of the traditional ballad form is to deflect the critical attention away from the poem’s autobiographical content. To make this point, this article investigates three illuminating contexts in which to place “La Belle Dame.” To begin with, “La Belle Dame” is a literary ballad that has much in common with Keats’s other poems and letters, whether at the level of poetic themes and personal concerns or at the level of language. However, the most important context to consider the ironic relationship of Keats’s lyrical content to his traditional ballad form is his revision of the poem for its first publication in the Indicator. If Keats’s intention was to reinforce the ballad conventions of the poem, downplay its lyrical implications, and strike a self-conscious pose critical of what he thought was the poem’s excessive sentimentality and easy surrender to wish-fulfilling romance, this very gesture is a confirmation that the poem, at least in its first version, is largely subjective and lyrical. As such, Keats’s seemingly objective ballad mode, later further revised and strengthened, can be regarded as a trick to disguise his true conflicted feelings about his own enthrallment by Fanny Brawn – a trick that ironically reveals as much as it attempts to conceal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barnard, John. John Keats. Cambridge UP, 1987.
Bate, Walter Jackson. John Keats. Belknap, 1963.
Bostetter, Edward Everett. The Romantic Ventriloquists: Wordsworth, Coleridge, Keats, Shelley, Byron. U of Washington P, 1963.
Colvin, Sidney. John Keats: His Life and Poetry, his Friends, Critics and After-fame. Macmillan and Co, 1917.
Coote, Stephen. John Keats: A Life. Hodder and Stoughton, 1995.
De Man, Paul. “Introduction to the Poetry of John Keats.” 1966. Critical Writings, 1939-1978, edited by Lindsay Waters, U of Minnesota P, 1989, pp. 179-97.
Evert, H. Walter. Aesthetic and Myth in the Poetry of John Keats. Princeton UP, 1965.
Finney, Claude Lee. The Evolution of Keats’s Poetry. Vol. 2, Harvard UP, 1939.
Gittings, Robert. John Keats. 1968. Heinemann, 1970.
Hancock, Albert Elmer. John Keats: A Literary Biography. Houghton Mifflin, 1908.
Jeffery N. Cox, “Lamia, Isabella, and The Eve of St. Agnes.” The Cambridge Companion to John Keats, edited by Susan J. Wolfson, Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 53-68.
Jones, Chris. (2005). “Knight or Wight in Keats’s ‘La Bella Dame’?: An Ancient Ditty Reconsidered.” St Andrews Research Repository, http://hdl.handle.net/10023/645
Keats, John. John Keats: Complete Poems. 1978. Edited by Jack Stillinger. Belknap, 1982.
---, Selected Letters of John Keats.1958. Edited by Grant F. Scott, rev. ed., Harvard UP, 2005.
Kelley, Theresa M. “Poetics and the Politics of Reception: Keats’s ‘La Belle Dame sans Merci.” John Keats, edited by Harold Bloom, Infobase Publishing, 2007, pp. 67-96.
Lowell, Amy. John Keats. Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin, 1925,
Matthews, G. M., editor. John Keats: The Critical Heritage. 1971. Routledge, 2000.
McFarland, Thomas. The Masks of Keats: The Endeavour of a Poet. Oxford UP, 2000.
McGann, Jerome. “Keats and the Historical Method in Literary Criticism.” MLN, vol. 94, no. 5, Dec. 1979, pp. 988-1032.
Motion, Andrew. Keats. Faber and Faber, 1997.
Murry, John Middleton Murry. Keats and Shakespeare: A Study of Keats’ Poetic Life from 1816 to 1820. Oxford UP, 1925.
Newman, Claire. “Exploring Keats’s Narrative Poems.” The English Review, vol. 13, no. 1, Sept. 2002, pp. 17+, The Research Center.
Patterson, Charles I., JR. The Daemonic in the Poetry of John Keats. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970.
Pettet, Ernest. C. On the Poetry of Keats. Cambridge UP, 1957.
Russell, Stanley C. (1967). “‘Self-Destroying’ Love in Keats.” Keats-Shelley Journal, vol. 16, Winter 1967, pp. 79-91. Jstor, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30210110.
Schulkins, Rachel. Keats, Modesty and Masturbation. Routledge, 2016.
Stillinger, Jack. Romantic Complexity: Keats, Coleridge, and Wordsworth. 2006. U of Illinois P, 2009.
Utley, Francis L. (1958). “The Infernos of Lucretius and of Keats’s La Belle Dame Sans Merci.” ELH, vol. 25, no. 2, 1958, pp. 105-121. Jstor, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2872032
Van Ghent, Dorothy. Keats: The Myth of the Hero. Edited by Jeffery Cane Robinson. Princeton UP, 1983.
Vendler, Helen. The Odes of John Keats. Belknap, 1983.
Ward, Aileen. John Keats: The Making of a Poet. Secker and Warburg, 1963.
Whale, John. John Keats: Critical Issues. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005
White, R. S. John Keats: A Literary Life. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.5p.118
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.