Speeding up Vocabulary Acquisition through Action Research
Abstract
Gaining a wider vocabulary is fundamental to language learning. It follows then that the faster students engage and learn new words, the faster will be their proficiency with the target language. Multi-Dimensional Vocabulary Acquisition (or MDVA) means approaching new terms / concepts from a variety of perspectives so that the target word is thoroughly analysed, giving students access to all dimensions of the word. There are many dimensions or elements that will help elucidate and unlock meaning, but for the purposes of this chapter new words will be looked at in terms of their antonyms, synonyms and associated words, rhyming counterparts, idiomatic usage, gender considerations, diminutive implications, proverbial usage and likely confusion with other words. In this study the author employs an Action Research methodology where practical classroom exercises involving students’ writing efforts pre- and post MDVA are closely examined. Using the familiar “spiral of cycles” approach, it becomes clear that “unpacking” the target word means that the meaning of many other words associated with the target word becomes explicit. A workshop with faculty is included as part of the practical application of MDVA.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chung, S.F. (2012) Research-Based Vocabulary Instruction for English Language Learners. The Reading Matrix, 12(2), 105-120.
Daller, H., Van Hout, R. & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003) Lexical Richness in the Spontaneous Speech of Bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 197-222.
Denscombe, M. (2010) Good Research Guide: For small – scale social research projects (4thed.). Open University Press. Berkshire, GBR.
Dick, B. (2000) A beginner’s guide to action research [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/guide.html
Gass, S.M. (2013) Second Language Acquisition.4th Edition. New York: Routledge.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001) Second Language Acquisition (2nded.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harrington, M. & Carey, M. (2009) The on-line Yes/No test as a placement tool. System, 37(4), 614-626.
Hilton, H. (2008) The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153-166.
Ishii, T. & Schmitt, N. (2009) Developing an Integrated DiagnosticTest of Vocabulary Size and Depth. RELC Journal, 40(1), 5-22.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. eds. (1988) The action research planner, 3rd ed. Victoria: Deakin Univ.
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (2012) “Vocabulary.” In S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 163-176). New York: Routledge.
Nakata, T. (2006) Implementing optimal spaced learning for English vocabulary learning: Towards improvement of the low-first method derived from the re-activation theory. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(2), 3-18.
Nassaji, H. (2004) The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 107-134.
Nation, P. (1990) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Nation, P. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
Nation, P. (2003) Vocabulary. In D. Nunan (ed.) Practical English Language Teaching.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nation, P. (2005) Teaching vocabulary.Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), 47-54.
Nation, P. & Newton, J. (1997) “Teaching Vocabulary.” In J. Coady and T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 238-54). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Nunan, D. (2003) Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Nunan, D. (2013) What Is This Thing Called Language?2nd Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nunan, D. (2015) Teaching English To Speakers of Other Languages. New York: Routledge.
Pulido, D. & Hambrick, D.Z. (2008) The virtuous circle: Modeling individual differences in L2 reading and vocabulary development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 164-190.
Qian, D.D. & Schedl, M. (2004) Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28-52.
Read, J. (2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
Read, J. (2007) Second language vocabulary assessment: current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 105-125.
Scott, J. A. & Scott, D. (2010) Developing word consciousness: Adaptable vocabulary strategies that students (especially English learners) and teachers like and use. Presentation at IRA World Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
Staehr, L.S. (2009) Vocabulary Knowledge and Advanced Listening Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577-607.
Webb, S. (2008) Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners.Studies in Second language acquisition, 30(1), 79-95.
Yu, G. (2010) Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances.Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236-259.
Zimmerman, K.J. (2004) The role of vocabulary size in assessing second language proficiency, MA Thesis, Brigham Young Univ.
Zimmerman, C. (2014) Teaching and learning vocabulary for second language learners. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, and M.A. Snow (eds.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: National Geographic Learning/Cengage.
Zareva, A., Schwanenflugel, P. &Nikolova, Y. (2005) Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(4), 567-595.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.245
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.