Astrophysics Titles in Scientific American Magazine (1990-2014): Linguistic and Discourse Practices

David I. Méndez, M. Ángeles Alcaraz


We analyze Astrophysics titles published in Scientific American Magazine in the period 1990-2014 and compare them with Astrophysics titles of specialized journals. Our main results show that titles published in Scientific American are short, clear, direct and with low lexical density and little terminology. They mainly consist in simple and nominal constructions with few adjectives and compound groups. The predominance of nominal compounds and the high number of verbal titles and definite articles imply that popularized science titles mainly deal with global and well-established concepts. Pragmatic and rhetorical strategies are common in Astrophysics Scientific American titles in order to appeal to multiple audiences and invite them to use their cultural background knowledge to grasp at the actual meaning. Although pragmatic and rhetorical mechanisms overlap in some titles, rhetorical devices seem to prevail over pragmatic ones. All in all, however, both types of devices reveal a growing trend over time.



Titles, Astrophysics, Scientific American Magazine, linguistic analysis, discourse practices

Full Text:



Alcíbar Cuello, M. (2004). La divulgación mediática de la ciencia y la tecnología como recontextualización discursiva. Análisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura, 31, 43-70.

Anthony, L. (2001). Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 44(3), 187-194.

Bucchi, M. (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In Massimiano Bucchi, & Brian Trench (Eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 57-76. London: Routledge.

Busch-Lauer, Ines-A. (2000). Titles in English and German research papers in medicine and linguistics. In Anna Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing Professional Genres, 77-97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Calsamiglia, H., & Van Dijk, T. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genoma. Discourse in Society, 15, 369-389. 0957926504043705.

Cartellier, D. (2010). La vulgarisation scientifique à l’heure de libre accessibilité des savoirs. Quelle place pour les médiateurs? Mémoires du Livre/Studies in Book Culture, 1(2).

Cheng, S. W., Kuo, Chih-Wei, & Kuo, Chih-Hua. (2012). Research article titles in applied linguistics. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 6(1), A1-A14.

Ciapuscio, G. (2005). Las metáforas en la creación y recontextualización de la ciencia. Signo & Seña, 14, 183-211.

Cortiñas, S. (2008). Las metáforas del ADN: Una revisión de los procesos divulgativos. Journal of Science Communication, 1(7), 1-9.

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In Walter Nash (Ed.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, 118-136. Newbury Park (CA): Sage.

Day, R. A. (1998). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dupriez, B. (1991). A Dictionary of Literary Devices (Gradus A-Z). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Fahnestock, J. (2004). Preserving the figure: Consistency in the presentation of scientific arguments. Written Communication, 21, 6-31.

Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond. M. J. (2004). Components of a research article. Retrieved from Article.pdf.

Fortanet, I., Posteguillo, S., Coll, J. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1998). Linguistic analysis of research article titles: Disciplinary variations, In Ignacio Vázquez Orta, & Ignacio Guillén Calvé (Eds.), Perspectivas Pragmáticas en Lingüística Aplicada, 443-447. Zaragoza (Spain): Anubar.

Frankel, F. C., & DePace, A. H. (2012). Visual strategies: A practical Guide to Graphics for Scientists and Engineers. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.

Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 212-232.

Goodman, N. W. (2000). Survey of active verbs in the titles of clinical trial reports. British Medical Journal, 320, 914-915.

Goodman, N. W. (2011). Fashion in medicine and language: Inferences from titles and abstracts of articles listed in PubMed. The Write Stuff, 20(1), 39-42.

Goodman, R. A., Thacker, S. B., & Siegel, P. A. (2001). What’s in a title? A descriptive study of article titles in peer reviewed medical journals. Science Editor, 24(3), 75-78.

Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attractions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 293-317.

Harmon, J. E. (2009). The structure of scientific titles. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39(4), 455-465.

Hartley, J. (2007). Planning that title: Practices and preferences for titles with colons in academic article. Library and Information Science Research, 29, 553–568.

Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519-539.

Horn, L., & Ward G. (Eds.) (2004). The Handbook of Pragmatics. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Huth, E. J. (1999). Writing and Publishing in Medicine. 3rd edition. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins.

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116-127.

Jacques, T. S., & Sebire, N. J. (2010). The impact of article titles on citation hits: An analysis of general and specialist medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports, 1(2).

Jacobi, D. (1987). Textes et Images de la Vulgarisation Scientifique. Bern: Peter Lang.

Jaime-Sisó, M. (2009). Titles or headlines? Anticipating conclusions in biomedical research article titles as a persuasive journalistic strategy to attract busy readers. Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, 39, 29-54.

Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653-661.

Jay, M. (2002). That visual turn. Journal of Visual Culture, 1, 87-92.

Jeanneret, Y. (1994). Écrire la Science. Formes et Enjeux de la Vulgarisation, Paris: PUF.

Kalleberg, R. (2000). Universities: Complex bundle institutions and the projects of enlightenment. Comparative Social Research, 19, 219-255.

Kecskes, I., & Horn L. (Eds.) (2007). Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kyvik, S. (2005). Popular science publishing and contributions to public discourse among university faculty. Science Communication, 26, 288-311.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lévy-Leblond, J. M. (2001). Science, culture et public: Faux problèmes et vraies questions. Quaderni, 46, 95-103.

Lewison, G., & Hartley, J. (2005). What’s in a title? Number of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics, 63(2), 341-356.

Luzón Marco, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication, 30, 428-457.

Maisonneuve, H., Lorette, G., Maruani, A., & Huguier, M. (2010). La Rédaction Médicale. Paris: Doin editeurs.

McGowan, J., & Tugwell, P. (2005). Informative titles described article content. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 26, 83-84.

Méndez, D. I., Alcaraz, M. Á., & Salager-Meyer, F. (2014). Titles in English-medium Astrophysics research articles. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2331-2351.

Méndez, D. I., & Alcaraz, M. Á. (2015). The use of abbreviations in English-medium Astrophysics research paper titles: A problematic issue. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3), 185-196.

Muñoz Dagua, C. (2010). El rol de la metáfora léxica en la divulgación de la ciencia. Tabula Rasa, 13, 273-292.

Myers, G. (1990). Writing Biology. Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5, 265-279.

Orrico, E. (2012). The Memory of scientific divulgation: An information discourse. Morpheus, 14, 128-144.

Paiva, C. E., Lima, J. P., & Paiva, B. S. (2012). Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics, 67, 509-513.

Pedersen, O. (2009). Early Physics and Astronomy: A Historical Introduction. 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodríguez Estrada, F. C., & Davis, L. S. (2015). Improving visual communication of science through the incorporation of graphic design theories and practices into science communication. Science Communication, 37(1), 140-148.

Rosner, J. L. (1990). Reflections on science as a product. Nature, 345, 108.

Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz Ariza, M.Á., & Luzardo Briceño, M. (2013). Titling and authorship practices in medical case reports: A diachronic approach. Communication and Medicine, 10(1), 63-80.

Sánchez Mora, A. M. (2000). La Divulgación de la Ciencia como Literatura. Mexico: UNAM.

Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 90-102.

Soler, V. (2011). Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish. English for Specific Purpose, 30, 124-137.

Smith, R. (2000). Informative titles in the BMJ. British Medical Journal, 320, 915.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge (UK): CUP.

Villaroya, O. (2013). An experientially-based informationless communication. In Àngels Massip-Bonet, & Albert Bastardes-Boada (Eds.), Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society, 61-73. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Wang, Y., & Bai, Y. (2007). A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System, 35, 388-399.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.