Phonological Errors among Dyslexic and Non-Dyslexic Children Learning Persian

Shahram Jamali Nesari, Elahe Kamari


The aim of this study was to examine the phonological errors made by dyslexics and non-dyslexic children in Persian orthography which is transcribed with two distinct spelling: words spelled with long vowels (transparent) and words spelled with short vowels (diacritics) are called opaque words. The sample of the study consisted of Fifteen dyslexic students with the mean age of 9.6, (SD= 1.5) and fifteen unimpaired elementary students with the mean age of 9.6 (SD= 1.4) who were Persian residents of 6th district of Tehran. All the participants were controlled for IQ, social class and behavioral disorders. The instrument used in this research was a set of phonological awareness task (rhymed word detection, rhymed word production, first sound detection, final sound detection, blending syllables and syllable deletion). Participants were required to do each of these phonological awareness tasks in order to compare their error rates in transparent and opaque words. The performance of the two groups was examined according to the effect of transparency variable. Data analysis was done using SPSS software. Overall, the finding showed that dyslexic children encountered more problems in both transparent and opaque words than did unimpaired children and the difference was statistically significant (P<0/05). On the other hand, correlation analysis (Pearson) showed a significant negative interaction between two variables (transparency and subjects) (P< 0/001). This means that dyslexic children in compare to normal ones committed more errors in phonological awareness tasks. The results of this research show that the degree of the transparency of writing systems affects the phonological processing ability of individuals.



Dyslexia, phonological awareness, transparency, opaque orthography

Full Text:



Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baluch, B., & Danaye-Tousi, M. (2006). Memory for words as a function of spelling transparency. The Journal of Psychology, 140 (2), 95-104.

Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read – A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.

Babbeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Baluch, A. D. (1992). Reading with and without vowels: What are the psychological consequences? Journal of Social and Evolutionary System.

Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children’sphonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1-30.

Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non-parallel processes? Reading and Writing, 7, 9-22.

Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 19-49.

Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31-45.

Goswami. U. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Multilingualism and Dyslexia. 6 (2). 133-151.

Jamali Nesari, Sh., & Kamari. E. (2004). Dyslexic children and their difficulties in reading Persian orthography. Advanceds in Language and Literary Studies. 4, 17-21.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.

Liberman, I., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Speech Education, 6, 8-17.

Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-27.

Poepodas, C. D., Pantelis, S. N., & Hantziou, E. (1990). Phonological and lexical encoding processes in beginning readers: Effects of age and word characteristics. Reading and Writing, 2, 197-208.

Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The non-word reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27 (1), 28-53.

Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed) Oxford: Blackwell.

Snowling, M. (1987). Dyslexia: A cognitive developmental review. Oxford: Blackwell.

Spencer, K. (2000). Is English a dyslexic language? Dyslexia, 6, 152-162.

Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Does dyslexia exist? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 579-595. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154-177.

Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1-33.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.