The Explicit Instruction of Reading Strategies: Directed Reading Thinking Activity vs. Guided Reading Strategies

Mohammad Mehdi Yazdani, Mojtaba Mohammadi


Investigating the efficiencies and deficiencies of reading strategies is one of the noticeable issues in the related theory and research in reading comprehension instruction. This study was to examine the impact of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) and Guided Reading (GR) on reading comprehension. Sixty three Iranian students of grade one in Shahed high school in the city of Bojnourd took part in the study. They were assigned in three groups, one control and two experimental groups. The instruction lasted for ten weeks. This study utilized a pretest posttest control group in quantitative quasi- experimental design. The same reading comprehension test was administered as pre-test and post-test. The results were twofold: First, the instruction of learning strategies could foster reading comprehension skill. Second, while the explicit instruction of both strategies could improve the students' reading comprehension skill, Directed Reading Thinking Activity had a more significant positive effect than Guided Reading.



Reading strategy, explicit, directed reading thinking activity (DRTA), guided reading (GR)

Full Text:



Almanza, T. (1997). The effects of the D.R.T.A. and co-operative learning strategies on reading comprehension. Retrieved on Feb. 22, 2013 from

Al Odwan, T. (2012). The effect of the directed reading thinking activity through cooperative learning on English secondary stage students’ reading comprehension in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(16). Retrieved on Feb. 10, 2013 from

Anderson, N. J. (2008). Active skills for reading: Intro. Canada: Thomson Heinle.

Anderson, N. L. (2012). Reading instruction. In A. Burns and J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 218-225). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. New York: Routledge.

Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension strategies for independent learners. New York: The Guilford press.

Davis, D. S. (2010). A meta-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Vanderbilt University, USA.

Dougherty Stahl, C. A. (2003). The effect of three instructional methods on the reading comprehension and content acquisition of novice readers (Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia). Retrieved on March 25, 2013from

El-Koumy, A. (2006).The effects of the directed reading-thinking activity on EFL students' referential and inferential comprehension (Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Suez Canal University, Egypt). Retrieved on April 10, 2013 from

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2007). A comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-Chinese university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8 (1), 71-88.

Lems, K., Miller, L. D., & Soro, T. M. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from linguistics. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.

Marshall, J. C. (2006). The effects of participation in literature circles on reading comprehension. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida). Retrieved on Apr. 10, 2013 from

Maxworthy, A. G. (1994). Do study guides improve text comprehension? Reading Horizons,34(2). Retrieved on April 15, 2013 from Reading

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mohammadi, M. (2009). On the relationship between learning strategies and EFL learners' level of proficiency. Modern Thoughts in Education, 4(3), 103-116.

Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative strategies for teaching reading comprehension: Maximizing your impact. Chicago: American library association.

Nazari, M., & Hashemi, M. R. (2012).Cooperative directed reading-thinking activity and referential-inferential reading comprehension skills. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(5). Retrieved on Jan. 12, 2013 from

Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 166-172). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., &Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 276–305.

Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a foreign language, 14 (1), 234- 255.

Shang, H. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12 (2), 18-42.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Washington, D. C.: Rand Corporation.

Vander Does, S. (2012). Describing comprehension teachers' observations of students' reading comprehension. (Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Rhode Island). Retrieved on May 10, 2013 from

Van Keer, H. (2004). Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 37 – 70.

Wright, M., & Brown, P. (2006). Reading in a modern foreign language: Exploring the potential benefits of reading strategy instruction. Language Learning Journal, 33, 22-33.

Yau, J. C. (2005). Two Mandarin readers in Taiwan: Characteristics of children with higher and lower reading proficiency levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 108-123.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.