EFL Curriculum Design: The Case of the Greek State School Reality in the Last Two Decades (1997-2014)

Alexandra Anastasiadou


This paper will delve into the last three versions of curriculum for the teaching of English in the Greek state school in the last seventeen years (1997- 2014). More specifically, an analysis of these three curriculums was carried out with a view to tracing similarities and differences and exploring the incorporation of contemporary methodological and pedagogical approaches or lack thereof. The results reveal evidence of similarities such as smooth integration of new information to the students’ stored knowledge and differences namely the application of differentiated instruction among these three documents which are indicative of the gradual social and pedagogical changes both worldwide and locally. The connection between the layout of the curricula is substantiated and tentative suggestions are provided for ameliorating their content and aims so as to render them more accessible to learners’ needs.


L2 English curriculum design, curriculum development, educational innovation, methodological and pedagogical approaches to teaching foreign languages, Greek educational reality

Full Text:



Bell, D. (2007). Do teachers think that methods are dead? ELT Journal 61/2, p.143.

Brewster, J., Ellis, D. & Girard, D. (1991). The primary English teacher’s guide. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Brown, H. D. (2002). ‘English language teaching in the ‘‘post-method’’ era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment’ in J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (eds.). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brumfit, C. (1984). Function and structure of a state school syllabus for learners of second or foreign languages with heterogeneous needs” General English Syllabus Design ELT Documents 118. Oxford: Pergamon Press and British Council, pp 75-81.

Bruner, J. (1988). On teaching thinking: an afterthought in Richardson K. & Sheldon, S. (1988 eds) Cognitive development to adolescence. Hove: Psychology Press Publishers and the Open University.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework for reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dendrinos, B. , Triantafilou, T., Tagglidis, T. , Kosovitsa, C., Kinigou, I., Liarou, E., Mouzekiti, A., & Sepirgioti, M. (1997). Comprehensive 6 year curriculum for the teaching of English (4th-9th form) Athens: ΟΕΔΒ.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective.Language Teaching 41/2, pp. 147–181. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004867.

Hall, D. R. & Hewings, A.(eds.) (2001). Innovation in English language teaching: A reader. London: Routledge.



Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1996). ESP A learning centred approach. Great Britain: Cambridge Universtiy Press

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). ‘The postmethod condition: (e)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching’. TESOL Quarterly 28/1: 27–47.

Langa, M. A., & Yost, J. L. (2007). Curriculum mapping for differentiated instruction, k-8. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.

Maciel, R. F. (2008). Curricular innovation in language teaching: implication for teacher development. X Seminário de Lingüística Aplicada. UFBA: Salvador.

Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press.

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Núñezy Bodegas, I. D. (2007). From curriculum to syllabus design: The different stages to design a programme. In Memorias del III Foro Nacional de estudios en lenguas: Fonael. ISBN 978-968-9308-13-3.

O’Brien, T. (1999). Course design and evaluation. Vol. 1. Patras: Hellenic Open University.

Panteliadou, S. & Philippatou, D. (2013 eds). Differentiated instruction. Athens: Pedio.

Pantaleoni, L. (1991) “L2 syllabusing at primary level: the Italian perspective’ in Brumfit et al., (eds) Teaching English to young learners. London: Collins ELT.

Prabbu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-Why? TESOL Quarterly 24/2, pp. 161- 172.

Richards, J. C. 1990. ‘Beyond methods’ in J. C. Richards (ed.). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the Communicative approach. ELT Journal 39/2, p 87.

Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. (2nd Ed.) Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Valiande, S. & Koutselini, M. (2008). Differentiation instruction in Mixed Ability classrooms, the whole picture: Presuppositions and Issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Linguistics, Behavioral and Social Sciences. Newport Beach, California.

Valiande, S. (2010). Differentiated Teaching in Mixed Ability Classrooms / Learning Processes and Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, CY. (In Greek). ISBN 978-9963-689-91-0.

Waters, A. & Vilches, M. L. C. (2001). Implementing ELT innovations: A needs analysis framework. ELT Journal 55/2, pp. 133–141.

West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching 27/1, pp. 1-19.

White, R. (1988) The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Widdowson, H. G. (1978) Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, M. (1991). A framework for teaching English to young learners in Brumfit et al., (1991 eds) Teaching English to young learners. London: Collins.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.112


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.