Testing the Predictive Validity of the IELTS Test on Omani English Candidates’ Professional Competencies

Moza Abdullah Said Al-Malki


This study has investigated the relationship between IELTS testing and Omani English teacher trainees’ professional competencies by adopting a quantitative method for data collection. A total number of 94 graduate freshmen Omani English teachers’ IELTS, CGPA and their teaching professional competencies are collected. The results reveal a moderate significant relationship between IELTS and CGPA but a weak relationship between IELTS and teaching competencies.  This study could contribute to the growing body of literature that aims to assess the construct validity of IELTS, and attempts to do so in the new terrain of teaching competencies. This study puts forwards recommendations for IELTS proficiency test in the Omani context.



International English Language Testing System, English Language proficiency, Professional competencies, Rusaq College of Applied Sciences

Full Text:



Ahmadi, H., Ozek, Y., & Demirel, E. (2012). The Sequence of Modules: A Facet in Language Proficiency Testing. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 11-19.

Berry, V., & Lewkowicz, J. (2000). Exit-test: Is there an alternative? Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 19-49.

Butler, Yuko Goto. (2004). What Level of English Proficiency Do Elementary School Teachers Need to Attain to Teach EFL? Case Studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245-278.

Cotton, F. and Conrow, F. (1998). An Investigation of the Predictive Validity of IELTS amongst a Group of International Students studying at the University of Tasmania. English Language Testing System Research Reports, 1, 72-115.

Dooey, P., & Oliver, R. (2002) An investigation into the predictive validity of the IELTS Test as an indicator of future academic success. Prospect, 17(1), 36-54.

Elder, C. (1993). Language proficiency as a predictor of performance in teacher education.

Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 2, 68-85.

Elder, C. (2001). Assessing the language proficiency of teachers: are there any border controls? Language Testing, 18(2), 149-170.

Epstein, M., & Hundert, M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(2), 226-235.

Erfani, S. (2012). A Comparative Washback Study of IELTS and TOEFL iBT on Teaching and Learning Activities in Preparation Courses in the Iranian Context. EnglishLanguage Teaching, 5(8), 185-195.

Feast, V. (2002) The Impact of IELTS Scores on Performance at University. International Education Journal 3(4), 70-85.

Fullerton, T. & Clements, A. (2002). The relevance of generic teacher competencies in the preparation of prospective teacher of Mathematics: Unpublished Paper, Faulty of Education, University of Newcastle.

Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.

Green, A. (2007) Washback to learning outcomes: a comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre-sessional language courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 75-9.

Hawkey, R. (2006). Impact theory and practice: Studies of the IELTS test and Progetto Lingue2000. Cambridge University Press.

Hayes, B., & Read, J. (2004). IELTS test preparation in New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS academic module. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 19-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Huntly, H. (2008). Teachers’work: Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 125-145.

Kerstjens, M and Nery, C. (2000) Predictive Validity in the IELTS Test: A Study of the Relationship Between IELTS Scores and Students’ Subsequent Academic Performance. English Language Testing System Research Reports, 3, 85-108.

Lumley, T., & Stoneman, B. (2000). Conflicting perspectives on the role of test preparation in relation to learning’. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 50-80.

Morton, J., &Moore, T.(2005). Dimensions of Difference: A Comparison of University Writing and IELTS Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 43-66.

Passos, A. (2009). A comparative analysis of teacher competence and its effect on pupil performance in upper primary schools in Mozambique and other SACMEQ countries. PhD: Policy Studies. In the department of Education Management and Policy studies, university of Pretoria.

Tonkyn, A. (1995) English language proficiency standards for overseas students: who needs what level? Journal of International Education, 6, 37–61.

Turner, J. (2004). Language as academic purpose, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 95–109.

UCLES, (1999b). IELTS Annual Review: 1998/1999. University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia, Cambridge.

Westera, W. (2001). Competences in Education: a confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 33(1), (pp.75-88).

Whitty, G. & Willmott, E. (1991). Competence-based Teacher Education: approaches and issues. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21(3), 309-318.

Wilson, J., & Komba, Sotco C. (2012). The Link between English Language Proficiency and Academic Performance: A Pedagogical Perspective in Tanzanian Secondary Schools. World Journal of English Language, 2(4).

Woodrow, L. (2006). Academic Success of International Postgraduate Education Students and the Role of English Proficiency. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1, 51-70.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.166


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.