The Effect of Summarizing and Presentation Strategies

Hooshang Khoshsima, Forouzan Rezaeian Tiyar


The present study aimed to find out the effect of summarizing and presentation strategies on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. 61 students were selected and divided into two experimental and control groups. The homogeneity of their proficiency level was established using a TOEFL proficiency test. The experimental group used the two strategies three sessions each week for twenty weeks, while the control group was not trained on the strategies. After every two-week instruction, an immediate posttest was administered. At the end of the study, a post-test was administered to both groups. Paired-sample t-test and Independent sample t-test were used for analysis. The results of the study revealed that summarizing and presentation strategies had significant effect on promoting reading comprehension of intermediate EFL learners. It also indicated that the presentation strategy was significantly more effective on students’ reading comprehension.



Reading strategy, summarizing, presentation, reading comprehension, EFL learners

Full Text:



Ahmadi, M. R., & Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. (2012). Reciprocal teaching strategies and their impacts on English reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies , 2 (10), 2053-2060.

Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research , 97 (4), 171-185.

Bossers, J. (1992). Reading in two languages: A study of reading comprehension in Dutch as a second language and in Turkish as a first language. Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam .

Carrell, P. L. (1991). Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency? Applied Linguistics , 12 (2), 159-179.

Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education , 71 (1), 5-23.

Davis, D. S. (2010). A meta-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University).

Dechant, E. (2013). Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. Routledge.

Duffy, G. G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers development and their low achievers understandings. The Elementary School Journal , 93 (3), 231-247.

Eskey, F. (2005). Tech talk:Better English through reading in science and technology. University of Michigan Press.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen .

Grabe, w., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Houtveen, A., & Van de Grift, J. (2007). Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction and instruction time on reading comprehension. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice , 18 (2), 173-190.

Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.

Lee, S. K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students' reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning Research Club: A Journal of Research in Language Studies , 57 (1), 87-118.

Lems, K., Miller, L. D., & Soro, T. M. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from applied linguistics. New York: The Guilford Press.

Lories, G., Darddene, B., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1998). From social cognition to metacognition. Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensios , 1-15.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, d. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing students achievement. New York: McREL.

McLeod, R. J., Heiko, D., & Lockwood, P. (1998). A study of learning strategies used by students with the Oz Soils interactive multimedia program. Computer: Research and Graduate School of Education , 24 (3), 120-135.

Nambiar, R. (2009). Cross linguistic transfer between L1 and L2 Texts: Learning strategies used by bilingual Malay tertiary learners. European Journal of Social Science , 7 (3), 114-125.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pub.

O'Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language , 14 (1), 1-17.

Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation. Journal of Educational Psychology , 69 (4), 381-387.

Soleimani, H., & Nabizadeh, F. (2012). The effect of learner constructed, fill in the map concept map technique,and summarising strategy on Iranian pre- university students' reading comprehension. Canadian Center of Science and Education , 5 (9).

Tang, H. N., & Moore, D. W. (1992). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension of ESL learners. Educational Psychology , 12 (3 and 4), 315-331.

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, D. K. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies: The handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan.

wright, M., & brown, P. (2006). Reading in a modern foreign language: Exploring the potential benefits of reading strategy instruction. Language Learning Journal , 33 (1), 22-33.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.