Assessment and Evaluation Applications and Practices of Science and Physics Teachers in Online Education during Covid-19

Ahmet Kumaş, Sabri Kan

Abstract


The Covid-19 epidemic, which deeply affected educational practices all over the world, caused significant difficulties in the process of effective evaluation of students with the suspension of face-to-face education. This research deals with the assessment-evaluation methods applied by science and physics teachers in the online education process in high schools due to the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey, and with the problems they have experienced in this process and with the proposed solutions. The research covers a 13-week period. A total of 65 teachers were included in the research. Qualitative method and phenomenology design was used in this research. Qualitative findings were evaluated with content analysis. During the online education period, it was determined that the teachers made assessments by sending questions and exams to the students via the Education Information Network (EBA), and sharing individual and group questions on social media, and there was no evaluation due to insufficient student participation in the courses. Alternative assessment-evaluation methods are mostly preferred by teachers who are open to academic development and a high level of digital literacy. Considering that online education applications are inevitable in emergency situations such as epidemics, the development of eligible assessment and evaluation applications and practices for online education is necessary as well as their presentation to teachers under the guidance of action researchers.

Keywords


Online Education, Covid-19, Science Education, Assessment And Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akdağ, E. (2021). Exploring experienced teachers’ attitudes to critical incidents. Reflective Practice, 1-15.

Aluko, F. R., & Omidire, M. F. (2021). A Critical Review of Student Assessment Practices in Distance Education in an Emerging Economy: Benchmarking Practices against Policy. Africa Education Review, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1920842

Amin, H. A., Khalil, H. S., Khaled, D., Mahdi, M., Fathelbab, M., & Gaber, D. A. (2020). Case item creation and video case presentation as summative assessment tools for distance learning in the pandemic era. Science Open Preprints.https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPKTXZI.v1

Anyan, F. (2013). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: a focus on qualitative research interview. Qualitative Report, 18, 36.

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Aydin, E., & Erol, S. (2021). The views of Turkish language teachers on distance education and digital literacy during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 60-71.http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.1p.60

Barcelona, A. B. (2020). An analytic hierarchy process for quality action researches in education. Int. J. Eval. & Res. Educ. Vol, 9(3), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20626

Bayat, S., & Şentürk, Ş. (2015). Fizik, kimya, biyoloji ortaöğretim alan öğretmenlerinin alternatif ölçme değerlendirme tekniklerine ilişkin görüşleri.AmasyaÜniversitesi Eğitim FakültesiDergisi, 4(1), 118-135. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/amauefd/issue/1732/21256

Besser, A., Flett, G. L., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000198

Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053

Boylu, E. (2021). Turkish as a foreign language teachers’ attitudes towards assessment and evaluation. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 72-85.http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.1p.72

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 2017, 1-360.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2009). Educational action research: A critical approach. The Sage handbook of educational action research, 74-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021021.n8

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, 26(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.538565

Christian, D. D., McCarty, D. L., & Brown, C. L. (2021). Experiential education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A reflective process. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 34(3), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1813666

Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435-437.

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1-20.https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Çalışkan, H., & Kaşıkçı, Y. (2010). The application of traditional and alternative assessment and evaluation tools by teachers in social studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4152-4156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.656

Çeliköz, M., & Erişen, Y. (2017). EPÖ Alanında görev yapan eğitim bilimcilerin yapılandırmacılık uygulamalarıyla ilgili görüşleri. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.03.012

Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 32(4), 519-535.

Hancock, C. R. (1994). Alternative assessment and second language study: What and why? ERIC Digest.

Hannah, K., Elizabeth, F., Kirsteen, H., Anne, L., & Soumaya, M. (2017). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education Romania 2017. OECD Publishing.

Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 267-282.

Huerta-Macias, A. (2002). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. Methodology in language teaching, 338-343.

Human Rights Watch (HRW, 2021). https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/17/pandemics-dire-global-impact-education. (Date of access: 26.05.2021)

Ilmiyah, S. and Setiawan, A.R. (2020), “Students’ worksheet for distance learning based on scientific literacy in the topic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. https://doi: 10.31237/osf.io/fpg4j

Jæger, M. M., & Blaabæk, E. H. (2020). Inequality in learning opportunities during Covid-19: Evidence from library takeout. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 68, 100524.

Karakaya, F., Selçuk, A. R. I. K., Cimen, O., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). Investigation of the views of biology teachers on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 6(4), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.792984

Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299-302.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299

Kozlinska, I. (2011). Contemporary approaches to entrepreneurship education. Journal of business management, (4).

Kumaş, A. (2021). Covid-19 uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrencilerin evdeki öğrenme ortamlarının değerlendirilmesi. International Academic Social Resources Journal, (e-ISSN: 2636-7637), 6, Issue:23; pp:354-372.https://doi.org/10.31569/ASRJOURNAL.182

Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: a guide for researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174023

Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolios plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment. Corwin Pres Inc.

McAteer, M. (2013). What is this thing called action research. Action research in education, 7-20.

Mertoğlu, H., Gürdal, A., & Akgül, E. M. (2019). Constructivism in theory and practice. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, 27, 145–165.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2020a). http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-23-martta-baslayacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-detaylari-anlatti/haber/20554/tr. (date of access: 11.06.2021)

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2020b). http://www.meb.gov.tr/uzaktan-egitim-30-nisana-kadar-devam-edecek/haber/20585/tr. (Date of access: 06.07.2021)

Mohapatra, A. K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on higher education. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 11(2), 4-6.

Nicol, D.J. (2007). Principles of good assessment and feedback: Theory and practice. REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility conference proceeding. http://ewds.strath.ac.uk/REAP07. (date of access: 12.05.2021).

Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International journal of educational excellence, 1(2), 101-110.

Payne, D. A., Russomando, G., Linder, M. W., Baluchova, K., Ashavaid, T., Steimer, W., & Ahmad-Nejad, P. (2020). External quality assessment (EQA) and alternative assessment procedures (AAPs) in molecular diagnostics: findings of an international survey. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 1(ahead-of-print).https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0101

Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1008-1032.

Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101-111.

Rose, S. (2020). Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. Jama. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5227

Sahbaz, A. (2020). Views and evaluations of university students about distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal (EDUPIJ), 9(3), 184-198.

Senel, S., & Senel, H. C. (2021). Remote assessment in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal, 8(2), 181-199.

Siyase Toplum Eğitim Vakfı (SETAV). (2021). https://www.setav.org/5-soru-koronavirus-covid-19-salgininin-egitim-ve-ogretmenlere-etkisi/. (date of access: 10.05.2021)

Stuessy, C. L., Parrot, J., and Foster, A. S. (2003, October). Using classroom observation to analyze the how and what of science teaching. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of School Science and Mathematics Association, Cleveland, Ohio.

Tan, Ş., & Erdoğan, A. (2004). Öğretimi planlama ve değerlendirme. Anı Yayıncılık.

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947

Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., Chitsaz, S., Karimian, L., & Charkhchi, R. (2011). A classification of qualitative research methods. Research Journal of International Studies, 20(20), 106-123.

Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., & Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397-404.

Yates, J., & Leggett, T. (2016). Qualitative research: An introduction. Radiologic technology, 88(2), 225-231.

Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü (YEGITEK). (2021a). http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/www/sayilarla-uzaktan-egitim/icerik/3225. (date of access: 04.06.2021)

Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü (YEGITEK). (2021b). http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/www/iletisim-daire-baskanligi/icerik/23. (date of access: 05.06.2021)

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı). Seçkin.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.4p.163

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.