Labeling English Learners: Teachers’ Perceptions and Implications

Lavern Byfield

Abstract


In the U. S., given the growing number of students who are speakers of languages other than English, this article brings attention to a need for a nuanced perspective on the definition of English learners. The study was designed to investigate teachers’ perceptions of English learners and the implications for classroom instruction. Teachers classified English learners as Latinos and conflated race and ethnicity with language proficiency. Although Amish students were included on classroom demographic forms, race/ethnicity and language were confused in teachers’ explanations of their accommodations for linguistically diverse students. In conflating language with race/ethnicity there are several implications for the Latina/o community and likewise for White bilingual communities with mostly deficit frames that are enacted in pedagogy for Latinos.

Keywords


Teachers’ Perceptions, English Learners, Labeling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bielenberg, B., & Wong Fillmore, L. (2005). The English they need for the test. Educational Leadership, 62, 45-49.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Commins, N. L., & Miramontes, O. B. (2005). Linguistic diversity and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New York Press.

Diaz-Rico, L. T. (2014). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete k-12 reference guide (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.

Erickson, F. (1987). Qualitative methods in research on teaching In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pps. 119-161). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

Garcia, G. E. & Bauer, E. B. (2009). Assessing student progress in the time of No Child Left Behind. In L. M.

Greenfield, R. A. (2013). Perceptions of elementary teachers who educate linguistically diverse students. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1-26.

Hall, S. (1996). Politics of identity. In T. Ranger, Y. Samad, & O. Stuart (Eds.), Culture, identity and politics: Ethnic minorities in Britain (pp. 129-135). Aldershot, UK: Avebury Publishing.

Hamilton, V. (2001). Letters to the editor. The Horn Book Magazine.

Jimenez, R. T., & Teague, B. L. (2009). Language, literacy, and content: Adolescent English language learners. In L. M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity (pp. 114-134). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lee, C. D. (2006). ‘Every good-bye aint gone:’ Analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 305-327.

Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., & Harpalani, V. (2003). Every shut eye ain’t sleep: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher, 32, 6-13.

Lessow-Hurley, J. (2013). The foundations of dual language instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Mahon, E. (2006). High-stakes testing and English Language Learners: Questions of validity. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 479-497.

McCarthey, S. J. (2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ writing instruction. Written Communication, 25 (4), 462-505.

Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 71-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2011). Table A-6-2. Number and percentage of children ages 5-17 who spoke a language other than English at home and who spoke English with difficulty, by age and selected characteristics. Online at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/tables/table-lsm-2.asp.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2013). The condition of education 2013. Online at https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=96

Ovando, C. J., Combs, M. C., & Collier, V. P. (2006). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

Pacheco, M. (2010). English language learners’ reading achievement: Dialectical relationships between policy and practices in meaning-making opportunities. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 292-317.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.

Reyes, M. (1992). Challenging venerable assumptions: Literacy instruction for linguistically different students. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 427-446.

Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pps. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

U. S. Census Bureau (2006). Current population survey, October supplement 1972-2005. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Commerce.

U. S. Census Bureau (2010). Hispanic population of the United States: Projections. Retrieved fromhttp://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic_pop_presentation.html

U.S. Department of Education (2011). Winning the future: Improving education for the Latino community. Washington, DC: Author.

Valenzuela, A. (2005). The accountability debate in Texas: Continuing the conversation. In C. E. Sleeter (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 1-32). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.4p.69

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.