Analyzing Recent Research in Computer Mediated Corrective Feedback from the Period 2008-2014

Atef Odeh AbuSa’aleek


There are different innovations in computer-mediated corrective feedback (henceforth CMCF), which help in offering corrective feedback to the students and proved to have an effect on learners’ linguistics outcomes. This study aims to present comprehensive representation of what has been investigated in the area of CMCF. In addition, it aims to analyze the effectiveness of recent CMCF research regard to adopting different research designs, different technologies, settings & types of feedback, different participants’ characteristics and different language and skill taught. The corpus of analysis consist 23 articles were collected from six well-known journals in the field of CALL from 2008 to 2014. The findings indicate that CMCF proved its effectiveness regardless adopting the above-mentioned variables.


Meta-analysis, computer-mediated communication, Effectiveness of corrective feedback

Full Text:



Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from culture projects in intermediate German classes. The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning, 115-144.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18.

Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research—towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1-2), 1-32.

Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(02), 165-198.

Ho, M., & Savignon, S. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269–290.

Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-476.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford

Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1-14.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in second language acquisition, 19(01), 37-66.

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 265-302.

Mark W. Lipsey, & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (Vol. 13). John Benjamins Publishing.

Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychol. Bull. 118 (2):183-92

Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, 133-164.

Sachs, R., & Suh, B. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3- 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, B., & Austin, R. (1999). Computer conferencing—Does it motivate EFL students? ELT Journal, 53(4), 270-279.

Yeha, Sh., & Lob, J. (2009). Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback. Computer & Education, 52(4), 882–892

Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39–58.

Zhao, Y. (2013). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO journal, 21(1), 7-27.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.