Model of School Innovation Administration toward Educational Quality Development under the Primary Education Service Area Office in Southern Border Provinces of Thailand
Abstract
This research is a study on the development of school management innovation in the sensitive border provinces of Thailand. We found that the operating conditions of innovative educational administration lead to the development of educational quality through processes that result in positive changes from the original. Our results also indicated that the model of innovative educational administration creates the following three principles: (a) Under the organizational context, there are six processes which consist of mission or legal duties, vision, values and culture, organizational structure, service recipients and stakeholders, and performance improvement system; (b) under the organizational leadership, there are eight processes which consist of intellectual stimulation, ideological influence, inspiration, individual consideration, vision for change, teamwork and participation, risk management, and creativity; (c) under the management system, there are six processes which comprise visionary leadership, strategic planning, expectations of service recipients and stakeholders, measurement, analysis and knowledge management, personnel management, and operations. The evaluation of usefulness and feasibility is the final finding in the results. The overall picture was the most useful (M = 4.69, SD =0.37), and the most feasible (M = 4.64, SD =0.40). In conclusion, this study can be used as a guideline for school services and development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chansrithong, A. (2016). A study of the administrative skills of administrators of child development centers in Rayong, Chanthaburi and Trat provinces [Master of Education Thesis]. Educational Administration Program, Graduate School, Ramkhamhaeng University.
Chaichumchuen, S. (2018). Innovation Management Model for Excellence of Private Schools of General Type under the Office of the Private Education Commission [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration]. Burapha University.
Chumwaengwapi, A. (2017). Development of an innovative organizational model of secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration]. Faculty of Education, Burapha University.
Chuenchonokphibun, P. & Kunarak, P. (2014). Innovative management model for developing the work of the Non-Formal Education Service Center, District. Eastern Asia University Academic Journal, 4(1), 156-167.
Dogan, B., Yıldız, B. (2023). The correlation between leadership styles and organizational cynicism: Which leadership style is best for schools?. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(4), 343.
Kerzner, H. & Author. (2025). A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Khemthongkhamdee, P. (2020). Innovative leadership of school administrators affecting the innovative organization of schools under the office of the secondary education area, Bangkok Area 2 [Master of Education Thesis]. Educational Administration Program, Kasetsart University.
Krungchalee, B. (2018). 21st Century management skills of basic education school administrators under the Surin primary educational service area office, Area 3 [Master of Education Thesis]. Educational Administration Program, Graduate School, Buriram Rajabhat University.
Mathaphan, T. (2020). Creating a state innovation organization. Organizational development innovation management. Journal of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, 6(8), 374.
National Economic and Social Development Council. (2019). Annual Report 2019. First printing February 2020.
Niyamapha, A. (2021). New model of educational institution administration towards the desired quality of education in the changing context. Journal of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, 14(2), 178-193.
Office of the Secretary of the Education Council. (2021). Innovation in management of educational institutions in developing learners to achieve desired outcomes according to national educational standards. Bueng Wittayakhom School, Prik Wan Graphic Co., Ltd.
Panthuwat, P (2017). Development of a management model for student care system in the aspect of student screening at Phrao Wittayakhom School, Chiang Mai Province [Doctor of Education Thesis]. Chiang Mai Rajabhat University.
Paophan, C. (2017). Modern educational administrators in the 21st century: Educational management for local development towards the ASEAN community: New directions in the 21st century. In the proceedings of the 1st National Academic Conference on Education, Kalasin University.
Phetsombat, P. (2017). Management skills of administrators of Rajamangala University of Technology, Pathum Thani Province. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi.
Phongphachan, C. (2018). Problems in the development of education to create peace ingovernment schools in the three southern border provinces. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 44(2), 116-157.
Piwasilpsak, S. (2019). Educational institution management model for excellence using the process of knowledge management of basic educational institutions under the Office of Secondary Education Area 35 [Doctor of Education Thesis]. Chiang Rai Rajabhat University.
Poolthap, W. (2020) (2020). Elements of school administration in educational innovation areas [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis]. Silpakorn University.
Royal Gazette. (2023). Ministerial Regulations for Educational Quality Assurance 2023. Office of the Secretariat of the Cabinet, Ministry of Education.
Saengtanang, K. (2020). Development Model of Educational Institutions into Innovative Organizations for Basic Educational Institutions. Journal of Social Sciences and Buddhist Anthropology, 5(7), 153-16.
Spraggon, M., & Bodolica, V. (2008). Understanding Successful Innovation through Different
Theoretical Lenses: The Case of Institutional, Resource– Based andSocial Capital / Network Perspectives. Sasin Journal of Management, 14(1), 117-133.
Thamtun, W. (2014). Innovative leadership of administrators affecting high-performance organizations of schools under the Office of Secondary Education Area 21 [Master of Education Thesis]. Educational Administration, Khon Kaen University.
Thanit, S. (2017). Theory and Practice of Educational Administration (4th ed.). Khao Fang.
Wansri, J. (2020). Innovation for educational institution development. Rattanasuwan Printing.
Wattana, A. (2018). School Administration Models for Excellence of Schools under the Provincial Administrative Organization [Doctor of Education Thesis]. Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.
Wutthirong, P. (2019). Innovation Management. Organizational Resources for Learning and Innovation (2nd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Yongyai, K. (2018). Educational administrators in the 21st century. Proceedings of the 2nd National Academic Conference on Research Presentation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.2p.500
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2013-2025 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.