Development of the Evaluation Indicator System for the Educational Quality of Application-Oriented Undergraduate Colleges in Guangxi
Abstract
This study aimed to (1) examine the current status of education quality evaluation in Guangxi's application-oriented undergraduate universities, (2) develop an evaluation indicator system for the educational quality of application-oriented undergraduate colleges in Guangxi, and (3) examine the feasibility and adaptability of the evaluation indicator system for the educational quality of application-oriented undergraduate colleges in Guangxi. A mixed-method approach combined qualitative research (field studies, in-depth interviews, focus groups, and Delphi Technique) with quantitative research (surveys). The research was conducted in three stages: (1) Analysis of the current state using document review, in-depth interviews, and surveys with 641 participants. Data were analyzed qualitatively (content analysis) and quantitatively (M and SD). (2) Development of the evaluation indicator system through focus group discussions with 15 experts and the Delphi technique with 17 participants, including experts, administrators, and professionals. The findings from Stage 1 helped refine the system, which was analyzed using averages and medians. (3) Evaluation of the system's feasibility and adaptability with five experts using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed to assess feasibility and adaptability. The results revealed (1) education quality in Guangxi’s applied undergraduate colleges is moderate, with the input dimension performing best, followed by background/environment, process, and output; (2) the developed evaluation system includes six first-level, 17 second-level, and 50 third-level indicators, addressing resources, processes, and outcomes, and (3) the system's feasibility and adaptability were high level, confirming its practical use for improving education quality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Astin, A. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York Macmillan.
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2014). Handbook on typology, outcomes-based education, and institutional sustainability assessment. Commission on Higher Education.
Chen, B. (2014). Constructing an assessment model of primary and secondary educational quality with talent quality as the core standard. Journal of Education & Learning, 3(4), 108–116.
Chen, S. (2014). The role of evaluation index systems in promoting education quality. Journal of Educational Studies, 12(4), 23–30.
Chen, Y. (2003). The quality of education: A societal perspective. Educational Development Research, 2(3), 45–53.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1994). Quality in the educational process. Total Quality Management Journal, 6(4), 32-38.
Korhonen, V., Mattsson, M., Inkinen, M., & Toom, A. (2019). Understanding the multidimensional nature of student engagement during the first year of higher education. Front. Psychol, 10(1056), 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01056
Liao, Z. (2007). Course evaluation standards and their application. Higher Education
Research, 9(3), 15–22.
Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., & Hugé, J. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(108), 1-18.
Lui, S. (2011). Impact of the quality assessment of undergraduate education on university change in China [Doctoral dissertation]. Institute of Education, University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk
Pan, M. (2000). Perspectives on educational quality. Journal of Higher Education Research, 18(1), 10–16.
Sallis, E. (2005). Total quality management in education. Kogan Page.
Song, S. (2021). Characteristics and challenges of undergraduate education in China. Applied Education Review, 18(1), 34–45.
Radó, P. (2020). The adaptability of education systems to future challenges in context: An analytical framework. CEU Center for Policy Studies.
Tian, M., Lu, G., & Li, L. (2022). Assessing the Quality of Undergraduate Education for International Students in China: A Perspective of Student Learning Experiences. ECNU Review of Education, 5(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221075039
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap. Paris: UNESCO.
Visser, W. (2015). Sustainable Frontiers: Unlocking Change through Business, Leadership and Innovation. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Limited
Wang, J. (2002). Education quality and sustainable development. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 4(2), 35–40.
Wang, Q. (2015). Defining and promoting education for sustainable development. Educational Research, 36(4), 56–62.
Wilkins, S. (2019). The return of China's soft power in South East Asia: An analysis of the international branch campuses established by three Chinese universities. Higher Education Policy, 32(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0084-x
Zhao, X., & Zhang, P. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in improving education quality in applied undergraduate colleges. Higher Education Research, 15(4), 320–338.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.2p.492
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2013-2025 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.