War and Peace Literacy of Social Studies Teacher Candidates: A Metaphorical Research

Ali Altıkulaç

Abstract


The aim of this study is to reveal the literacy levels and metaphors of Social Studies teacher candidates regarding the concepts of war and peace taught in secondary school. The research may be important in terms of revealing how Social Studies teacher candidates interpret the concepts of war and peace and how they perceive these concepts metaphorically. Phenomenology, one of the qualitative research designs, was used in the research. The study group of the research consists of 60 teacher candidates studying in the 4th year of the Social Studies Teaching undergraduate program of two state universities. In the research, it was determined what meanings Social Studies teacher candidates attributed to the concepts of war and peace. The collected metaphors were classified according to the metaphors used by teacher candidates. In addition, the resulting metaphors were grouped around certain common themes. Accordingly, the prospective teachers who participated in the research created 33 metaphors regarding the concept of war and 30 metaphors regarding the concept of peace. According to the research results, the most frequently repeated war metaphor is “massacre”, followed by metaphors such as “murder”, “apocalypse”, “grim reaper” and “virus”. The most frequently repeated peace metaphor is “breathing”, followed by Metaphors such as “peace”, “friendship”, “mother” and “obligation” were followed. Metaphors related to the concepts of war and peace were grouped under two categories: “positive” and “negative”. While metaphors about war were concentrated in the “negative” category, metaphors about peace were observed to be concentrated in the “positive” category. When the participants’ reasons for the decision to go to war were examined, the most recurring answers were “if the future and security of the country is in danger” and “to guarantee peace”. It has been determined that Social Studies teacher candidates who are new to the profession view war as a negative concept and peace as a positive concept. On the other hand, the fact that they create simple and easy justifications for deciding on war can be interpreted as their failure to internalize peace sufficiently.

Keywords


Peace, War, Teacher Candidates, Social Studies Education, Undergraduate Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktaş, Ö. & Safran M. (2013). An Evaluation of the Views of Secondary Education Students over the War and Peace in Terms of Different Variables, International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(8), 1587-1619.

Akyol, C., (2017). Uses and Benefits of Metaphors. A Practical Guide for Metaphor and Metaphorical Studies in Education (pp.51-92). Pegem Akademi.

Arslan, M. M. & Bayrakçı, M. (2006). Examination of metaphorical thinking and learning approach in terms of education and training. National Education Journal, 35(171), 100-108.

Aydın, F. (2011). Metaphorical perceptions of university students regarding the concept of “environment”. Eastern Geography Journal, 26, 25-44.

Baş, T. & Akturan, U. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Seçkin yayıncılık.

Cerit, Y. (2008). Views of Students, Teachers and Administrators on Metaphors Related to the Concept of Teacher. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 693-712.

Çelikten, M. (2006). Culture and teacher metaphors. Erciyes University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 1(21),

-283.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (3rd ed.). Sage.

Doyle, M. (1997). Ways of war and peace: Realism, liberalism and socialism. Norton. Fountain, S. 1999. Peace Education in UNICEF, (working paper, UNICEF, June 1999).

Galtung, J. (1973). Gewalt, Frieden und Friedensforschung. In Senghaas, D. (Ed.), Kritische Friedensforschungn (pp. 55-104). Suhrkamp.

Gavriely, N. D. (2014). Talking peace- Going to war. Peace in the service of the İsraeli just war rhetoric. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 1-18.

Geçit, Y. & Gencer, G. (2011). Determining the geography perceptions of first year classroom teaching students through metaphor (Rize University example). Marmara Geography Magazine, 23, 1-19.

Hakvoort, I. (2010). The conflict pyramid: A holistic approach to structuring conflict resolution in schools. Journal of Peace Education, 7(2), 157-169.

Higgs, R. (2012). War is Horribble, but… The Independent Review, 17(2), 305–316.

Kanatlı, F. & Schreglmann, S. (2017). Analysis of The War And Peace Concept Through The Perspectıves Of Elementary School Students via Metaphors. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 14, (37), 127-146.

Keçe, M. (2014). Perception analysis of history and Social Studies teacher candidates’ relation with some history concepts through metaphors. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29(4), 143-156.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaphors: Life, meaning and language (Trans. G. Y. Demir). İstanbul: Paradigma.

Levine, P. M. (2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(4), 172-175.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.

Matthews, I. (2002). Helping teachers teach a conflict resolution method. In A. Verdiani (Ed.), Best Practices of Non-Violent Conflict Resolution in and out-of-school some examples (pp. 29-32). Published by the United Nations Education Science and Culture Organisation. Paris.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.

Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 606-622.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathe- matics and science (Volume I).

Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language, and thought, In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press.

Patton, Q. M. (2014). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Trans. Ed.: Bütün, M. & Demir, S. B.). PegemA Yayınları.

Rundgren, C. J., Hirsch, R & Tibell, L. A. E. (2009). Death of Metaphors in Life Science? - A study of upper secondary and tertiary students‟ use of metaphors in their meaning-making of scientific content, Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1).

Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors about school. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 55(55), 459-496.

Şan, S. & Yılmaz, A. (2016). War and peace metaphors of the 7th grade students. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 3(4), 221-231

Şehirli, Y. A. (2018). Metaphorical Perceptions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates about the Concept of Peace. Turkish Studies Social Sciences, 13(26), 1055-1070.

Tubin, D. (2005). Fantasy, vision, and metaphor-three tracks to teachers’ minds. The Qualitative Report, 10(3), 543-560.

Von Clausewitz, C. (2008). On war. Princeton University Press.

Wulf, C. (2013). Human Development in a Globalized World. Education towards Peace, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 71(254), 71-86.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Yayıncılık.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.3p.218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.