Myanmar EFL Learners’ Perspectives, Structure, Reasoning and Literacy Practices of Argumentative Writing: A Needs Analysis Study

Khin May Oo, Takeshi Okada

Abstract


Enhancing proficiency in argumentative writing in English has always been a challenge for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Despite the widespread use of argumentative essays in international tests such as International English Language Testing System (IELTS) and Tests of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) in recent years, the learners usually fail to meet satisfactory achievement levels in the EFL context. This paper investigates the issue closely by reviewing Myanmar EFL learners’ needs, wants, and problems in developing argumentative writing. Although there has been some discussion on factors that potentially challenge EFL learners’ argumentative writing, more research is needed on the integrated assessment to cater to the learners’ needs. This analysis reports the results of a group of undergraduates (n=44) in Myanmar. This research was based on triangulation data, including sources from questionnaires administered to the students’ purposes, preferences, and challenges, and analyzing students’ argumentative writing structurally and qualitatively for reasoning. The findings reveal that students were eager to learn argumentative writing, particularly for their immediate needs. Though students were not well trained with a communicative teaching approach in their curriculum, they preferred to learn argumentative writing dialogically, using classroom debates. They favored learning future argumentative writing courses by communicating meaningfully. Regarding the challenges in argumentative writing, most students could not produce counter-arguments and rebuttals. Based on the data elicited from the students, this needs analysis proposed implementing the integrated learning-to-argue and arguing-to-learn instructions and using argumentative literacy practices to engage students in dialogic learning in the EFL context.

Keywords


EFL, Undergraduates, Argumentative Writing, Literacy, Needs Analysis, Myanmar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdollahzadeh, E., Amini Farsani, M., & Beikmohammadi, M. (2017). Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL learners. Argumentation, 31, 641-661.

Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88-103.

Andrews, R., Robinson, A., See, B. H., Torgerson, C., Mitchell, S., Peake, K., & Prior, P. (2006). Research project report: Argumentative skills in first year undergraduates.

Bacha, N. N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 229-241.

Bracewell, R. J., & Breuleux, A. (1994). Substance and romance in analyzing think-aloud protocols. Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology, 55-88.

Butt, N. (2010). Argument construction, argument evaluation, and decision-making: A content analysis of argumentation and debate textbooks. Wayne State University.

Bychkovska, T., & Lee, J. J. (2017). At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 38-52.

Chuang, P. L., & Yan, X. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between argument structure and essay quality in assessed writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 100892.

Crammond, J. G. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15(2), 230-268.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Dickson, R. (2004). Developing “real-world intelligence”: Teaching argumentative writing through debate. The English Journal, 94(1), 34-40.

Ene, E., & Sparks, S. (2020). EFL Writing in Romania: Reflections on Present and Future. In D. R. Andron & G. Gruber (Eds.), Education beyond Crisis (pp. 217-230). Brill.

Ferretti, R. P., & De La Paz, S. (2011). On the comprehension and production of written texts: Instructional activities that support content-area literacy. In R. O’Connor & P. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 326–355). Guilford Press.

Frijters, S., ten Dam, G., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2008). Effects of dialogic learning on value-loaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 66-82.

Ghanbari, N., & Salari, M. (2022). Problematizing argumentative writing in an Iranian EFL undergraduate context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862400.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445.

Hashemi, M. R., Behrooznia, S., & Mahjoobi, F. M. (2014). A critical look into Iranian EFL university students’ critical thinking and argumentative writing. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 17(1), 71-92.

Hayden, M., & Martin, R. M. (2013). Recovery of education system in Myanmar. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2, 47–57.

Hinkel, E. (2011). What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn’t? Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2, 523-538.

Hirvela, A. (2017). Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 100(36), 69-74.

Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2021). Argumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy. University of Michigan Press.

Husain, D. L., & Nggawu, L.O. (2022). A needs analysis in improving writing class activities in EFL classroom context. Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(8), 766-774.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language teaching, 46(1), 53-70.

Javadi-Safa, A. (2018). A brief overview of key issues in second language writing teaching and research. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 12-25.

Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press.

Ka-kan-dee, M., & Kaur, S. (2015). Argumentative Writing Difficulties of Thai English Major Students. The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings.

Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 17(1), 7-29.

Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System, 45, 117-128.

Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System, 89, 102198.

Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written Communication, 19(1), 109-174.

Majidi, A. E., Graaff, R. D., & Janssen, D. (2023). Debate pedagogy as a conducive environment for L2 argumentative essay writing. Language Teaching Research, 1–25.

Majidi, A. E., Janssen, D., & Graaf, R. (2021). The effects of in-class debate on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 1–15.

Malloy, J. A., Tracy, K. N., Scales, R. Q., Menickelli, K., & Scales, W. D. (2020). It’s not about being right: Developing argument through debate. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 79-100.

MayOo, K., & Eto, H. (2023). Integrating learning to argue and arguing to learn instructions: Enhancing English language proficiency and argumentative writing of EFL learners. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 7(40), 1-14.

McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 62-76.

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and instruction, 14(2), 139-178.

Mitchell, S. (2000). Putting argument into the mainstream. In S. Mitchell & R. Andrews (Eds.), Learning to argue in higher education (pp.146-154). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Newell, G. E., Bloome, D., & Hirvela, A. (2015). Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms. Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.

Nussbaum, E. M., Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of educational psychology, 97(2), 157-169.

Nwet, Y. (2017). An investigation into the impact of process approach to teaching writing in Myanmar language at the high school level. [PhD Thesis, Yangon University of Education]. Methodology Department, Yangon University of Education.

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Carbonaro, W. (2001). On the ecology of classroom instruction. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool (pp. 57-81). Dordrecht: Springer.

Oros, A. L. (2007). Let’s debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(3), 293-311.

Peloghitis, J. (2017). Difficulties and strategies in argumentative writing: A qualitative analysis. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in language education. Tokyo: JALT.

Perkins, D. N. (1985). Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. Journal of educational psychology, 77(5), 562.

Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of Intelligence. In J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins, & J.W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp.83-106). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98-112.

Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444-456.

Ramage, J., & Bean, J. C. (1999). Writing arguments. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(4), 215-232.

Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., & Kuo, L. J. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449-472.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science education, 92(3), 447-472.

Saprina, C. M., Rosyid, A., & Suryanti, Y. (2021). Difficulties in developing idea encountered by students in writing argumentative essay. Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1).

Saputra, A. B. B., Jumariati, & Febriyanti, E. R. (2021). EFL Students’ Problems in Writing Argumentative Essays. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language, Literature, and Arts (ICELLA 2021), 587, 8–12.

Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The journal of the learning sciences, 12(2), 219-256.

Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022). Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: a study of assessing less proficient EFL writers’ text quality. Assessing Writing, 54, 100672.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.

Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23.

Sundari, H., & Febriyanti, R. H. (2021). The analysis of Indonesian EFL argumentative writing using Toulmin’s model: The structure and struggles from the learners. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 67-78.

Tasya, M. A. (2022). Students’ Difficulties in Writing an Argumentative Essay [Bachelor’s thesis, Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta].

Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 170-178.

Tin, T. B. (2014). Learning English in the periphery: A view from Myanmar (Burma). Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 95-117.

Torgesen, J. (2007). A principal’s guide to intensive reading intervention for struggling readers in Reading First schools. Florida Centre for Reading Research. ERIC.

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287-306.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. & Trans.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

Walker, A., & Kettler, T. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills in high ability adolescents: effects of a debate and argument analysis curriculum. Talent, 10(1), 21-39.

Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183-209.

Wu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2021). An Action Research Study Aimed at Improving Chinese High School Students’ Argumentation in EFL Writing. In A. Hirvela & D. Belcher (Eds.), Argumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy, 187-203. University of Michigan Press ELT.

Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and education, 23(1), 31-48.

Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study of claims and qualifiers in ESL students’ argumentative writing based on Toulmin model. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1-17.

Ye, W., & Wang-Hiles, L. (2021). An Analysis of the Chinese Way of Arguing: Creating a hybrid model to teach argument as an inquiry process. In A. Hirvela & D. Belcher (Eds.), Argumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy, 82-98. University of Michigan Press ELT.

Yoon, H. J. (2021). Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: Effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 705-725.

Zhang, Y. (2018). An investigation into the development of structure and evidence use in argumentative writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(11), 1441-1448.

Zheng, C. (2013). A Structure Analysis of English Argumentative Writings Written by Chinese and Korean EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 67-73.

Zorwick, L. W., & Wade, J. M. (2016). Enhancing civic education through the use of assigned advocacy, argumentation, and debate across the curriculum. Communication Education, 65(4), 434- 444.

Zou, M., Li, X., & Lee, I. (2021). Blending learning to argue and arguing to learn in EFL writing instruction: A classroom inquiry. In A. Hirvela & D. Belcher (Eds.), Argumentative writing in a second language: Perspectives on research and pedagogy, 169-186. University of Michigan Press ELT.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.1p.60

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.