The Effect of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) on Reading Comprehension in English for Specific Purposes Courses

Fahimeh Farahani

Abstract


Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) has potential to help language learners; however, it has received scant attention. The present study was an attempt to investigate the effect of NLP techniques on reading comprehension of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners at an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course. To achieve this goal, two intact classes of students were selected to form an experimental group (n=30) and a control group (n=30). A reading pretest (based on the course content) was given to all participants. The sensory learning styles of the participants were diagnosed using Reid's (1987) leaning style questionnaire, and the participants in the experimental group were familiarized with NLP techniques to be able to implement these techniques in their reading. In the control group, the conventional approach to teach ESP reading was used. Considering the analysis of posttest results through ANCOVA, it was found that implementation of NLP techniques can have significant effect on reading comprehension of Iranian undergraduate EFL learners. Pedagogical implications are discussed.


Keywords


Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), English for specific purposes (ESP), Reading comprehension, Iranian Undergraduate EFL learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbari, Z., & Tahririan, M. H. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies in an ESP context: The case of Para/medical English in Iran. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 39-61.

Alemi, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). The Effects of pre-reading activities on ESP reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 1(5), 569-577.

Amirian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2009). Reassessing the ESP courses offered to engineering students in Iran. English for specific purposes world, 8(23), 1-13.

Arivuchel Van, K. & Lakahmi, K. (2017). Reading comprehension system-A review. Indian J. Sci. Res, 14(1), 83-90.

Baker, J. & Rinvolucri, M. (2005). Neuro-Linguistic programming. English Teaching Professional, 37, 4-6.

Baalbaki, W., & Zylberglejd, D. (n.d). CS224N: Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning Reading Comprehension. retrieved on 12, Feb, 2018, from https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs224n/reports/2718305.pdf

Bandler, R. & Grinder, J. (1975). The Structure of Magic I: a book about language and therapy. Palo Alto, California: Science and Behaviour Books, Inc.

Burns, P. C., Roe, B. D., & Ross, E. P. (1999). Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context, 1, 39-64.

Hariri, M. & Tahriri, A. (2013). EFL learners’ attitudes towards using mind mapping technique in their reading comprehension. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 3(1), 39- 47.

Hu, Y. (2004). The cultural significance of reading instruction in China. The Reading Teacher, 57(7), 632-639.

Isazadeh, P., Makui, S. M. Z., & Ansarian, L. (2016). Effect of instructional vs. authentic video materials on introvert and extrovert Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4).

Kamyab, G. H., Mahboubi, A., Seddigh, F. Shokrpor, N. (2016). Reading Science and Medicine in English. Fars, Iran: Ide Derakhshan Publication

Lorenzo, F. (2005). Teaching English for specific purposes. UsingEnglish.com. Retrieved October, 2017 from http://www.usingenglish.com/teachers/articles/teaching-englishforspecific-purposesesp.html

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). NY: Open University Press.

Pishghadam, R., Shayesteh, S., & Shapoori, M. (2011). Validation of an NLP scale and its relationship with teacher success in high schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 909-917. Retrieved on October 23, 2017, from http://www.ojs.academypublisher.com

RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1465.pdf

Revell, J., & Norman, S. (1997). In your hands: NLP in ELT. London, England: Saffire Press.

Richards, J. C., Rodgers, T. S. (2000). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Oxford; Oxford University Press.

Spector-Cohen, E., Kirschner, M., & Wexler, C. (2001). Designing EAP reading courses at the university level. English for Specific Purposes, 20(4), 367-386.

Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2003). Neuro-linguistic programming: Its potential for learning and teaching in formal education.

Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2006). Introducing Neuro-linguistic Programming. Retrieved on Dec 11, 2017 from www.som.surrey.ac.uk/NLP/Resources/Introducing NLP.pdf.

Wang, T. I., Wang, K. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2008). Using a style-based ant colony system for adaptive learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2449-2464.

Winch, S., (2005). From Frustration to Satisfaction: Using NLP to Improve Self Expression. Retrieved on Dec 12, 2017 from http://www.englishaustrailia.com.au/index.cgi




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.79

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.