Self-generated Literacy Practices in Disadvantaged Environments in Chile

Margarita Calderón López


This study explores the role of literacy in disadvantaged environments and the interplay between self-generated literacy practices and their conceptualization of literacy in 7 to 10-year-old Chilean pupils from two different schools located in Santiago, Chile. The study was framed within a participatory approach focused on promoting the children’s agency and voice in the research. A range of second-level data materials were collected through interviews with parents, photographs and existing documents. Although at a resources-associated level the sociocultural context did not inhibit the emergence of literacy practices, the context did contribute to the children’s understanding of literacy. This study raises the need for considering how children’s understanding of literacy influence their involvement and learning about reading and writing as their experiences and perceptions have an important role in their learning process, particularly on how they develop their reading and writing practices. The findings implied that by raising the participants’ awareness of the relevance of everyday practices in relation with reading and writing, they are likelier to feel more comfortable and empowered towards their own literacy practices. Particularly, the empowerment of children coming from a disadvantaged background would give them more opportunities to support their learning. By making the children aware of the relevance of their own perceptions and practices, the pupils could gain in confidence, be agents of their learning processes, and have more resources to succeed on the demanding school environment.


home practices, children’s writing, disadvantaged communities, participatory research, Chile

Full Text:



Abbott, L., & Gillen, J. (1999). Revelations Through Research Partnerships. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 20(1), 43-51.

Ávalos, D. (2007). Medición de la vulnerabilidad social: Un análisis de los alumnos de Infocap [Measurement of the social vulnerability: An analysis of Infocap students]. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Thesis.

Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. Reading and writing in context. . London, New York: Routledge.

Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy Practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context (pp. ). London: Routledge.

Barton, D. (2001). Directions for Literacy Research: Analysing Language and Social Practices in a Textually Mediated World. Language and Education, 15(2-3), 92-104.

Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub.

Bearne, E. (2004). Multimodal texts: What they are and how children use them? In E. Bearne (Ed.), Literacy moves on: using popular culture, new technologies and critical literacy in the primary classroom (pp. 16-30). London: David Fulton Publishers.

Bloome, D., & Green, J. (1991). Educational Contexts of Literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 49-70.

Blumenthal, D. (2011). Is Community-Based Participatory Research Possible? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 386–389.

Brunner, J. J., & Cox, C. (1995). Dinámicas de Transformación en el Sistema Educacional de Chile [Dynamics of Transformation in Chile's Education System]. In J. Puryear & J. J. Brunner (Eds.), Educación, Equidad Y Competitividad Económica en las Américas [Education, Equity and Economic Competitiveness in the Americas] (Vol. II, pp. 101-152). Washington, D.C. : OEA.

Burnett, C., Davies, J., Merchant, G., & Rowsell, J. (2014). New Meaning-Making Practices: A Charter for Literacy Education. In C. Burnett, J. Davies, G. Merchant & J. Rowsell (Eds.), New Literacies Around the Globe: Policy and Pedagogy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Calderón, M. (2015). Writing across home and school. The literacy practices and beliefs of 7- to 10-year-old Chilean children, and their relationship with writing. (Doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster, Inglaterra.

Calderón, M. (2014, September). Using Participatory research to involve children from disadvantaged Chilean communities in addressing literacy. Paper presented at the ECER: The Past, the Present and Future of Educational Research in Europe. European Educational Research Association. Porto, Portugal. Retrieved from

Calderón, M., & Theriault, V. (2016). Accessing a'very, very secret garden': exploring children's and young people's literacy practices using participatory research methods. Language & Literacy, 1-15.

Camitta, M. (1993). Vernacular writing: varieties of writing among Philadelphia high school students. In B. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CASEN. (2015). Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional (Casen). Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico. Online. Retrieved from:

Castillo, J., Miranda, D., & Carrasco, D. (2012). Percepción de Desigualdad Económica en Chile: Medición, Diferencias y Determinantes [Perception of Economic Inequality in Chile: Measurement, Differences and Determinants], Psykhe, 21(1), 99-114.

Cook-Gumperz, J. (2006). The Social construction of literacy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duckworth, V. (2014). Learning trajectories, violence and empowerment amongst adult basic skills learners. London: Routledge.

Feres, J., & Mancero, X. (2001). Enfoques para la medicion de la pobreza. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL, Naciones Unidas.

Fleming, J. (2010). Young People's Involvement in Research: Still a Long Way to Go? . Qualitative Social Work, 10(2), 207-223.

Goldenberg, C., Gallimore, R., & Reese, L. (2005). Using mixed methods to explore Latino children's literacy development. In T. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children's development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: theorizing practice in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Heath, S. B. (1982). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring literacy and orality (pp. 91–118). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press.

JUNAEB (2005). SINAE Sistema Nacional de Asignación con Equidad para Becas JUNAEB: Una nueva visión en la construcción de igualdad de oportunidades en la infancia. Online. Retrieved 13/03/2015. Available in: >

Kalman, J. (2005). Discovering literacy : access routes to written culture for a group of women in Mexico. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.

Kalman, J. (2004). El estudio de la comunidad como un espacio para leer y escribir [The study of the community as a place to read and write]. Revista Brasileira de Educação(26), 5-28.

Marsh, J. (2006). Popular culture in the literacy curriculum: A Bourdieuan analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 160-174.

Mason, J., & Hood, S. (2011). Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 490-495.

OECD. (2011). Society at a Glance 2011.: OECD Publishing.

Papen, U. (2007). Literacy and globalization: reading and writing in times of social and cultural change. London: Routledge.

Reder, S. & Avila, E. (2005). Context and literacy practices. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 170–187.

Raczinsky, D. & Serrano, S. (2002). Programas de superación de la pobreza y el capital social. Evidencias y aprendizajes de la experiencia en Chile [Overcoming poverty and social capital. Evidences and learning from the Chilean experience]. In: Aprender de la experiencia. El capital social en la superación de la pobreza (Learning from the experience. The social capital in the overcoming of poverty). Santiago: CEPAL.

Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rogoff, B., Moore, L., Najafi, B., Dexter, A., Correa-Chávez, M., & Solís, J. (2007). Children’s development of cultural repertoires through participation in everyday routines and practices. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 490-515). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Rubie-Davies, C. (2006). Teacher expectations and Student Self-Perceptions: Exploring Relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 537-552. DOI: 10.1002/pits.20169

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Scribner, S., Cole, M., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Strasser, K., & Lissi, M. R. (2009). Home and Instruction Effects on Emergent Literacy in a Sample of Chilean Kindergarten Children. Scientific studies of reading, 13(2), 175-204.

Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Street, B.V. (2001). The new literacy studies. In E. Cushman, G.R. Kintgen, B.M. Kroll, & M.Rose (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 430-442). Boston: St. Martin’s Press.

Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.

Susperreguy, M. I., Strasser, K., Lissi, M. R., & Mendive, S. (2007). Creencias y prácticas de literacidad en familias chilenas con distintos niveles educativos [Literacy beliefs and practices in Chilean families with different educational levels]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 39(2), 239.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wasik, B. (2004). Family literacy programs: Synthesizing across themes, theories, andrecommendations. In B. Wasik (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 617-632). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.