The Relationship between Teacher's Written Feedback and Student's' Writing Performance: Sociocultural Perspective

Maryam Bijami, Ambigapathy Pandian, Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh


Feedback plays a fundamental role in writing development. The present study seeks to investigate the impact of teacher's written feedback on the writing performance of Iranian undergraduates. The subjects were 400 students majoring in the fields of English language translation and English language literature in four universities, namely Shahaid Bahonar, Vali-e-Asr, Isfahan and Shiraz, in Iran. Writing tasks, questionnaires and interviews were used in the process of the present study. Mixed methods research design was adopted in this study. Therefore, this research used the triangulation of data collection techniques. For data analysis, the thematic coding was used for analyzing semi-structured interview. In the writing task, inter-rater agreement (Cohen kappa) was used and the Pearson correlation coefficient was run for analysis of the questionnaire. The result shows a significant relationship between teacher's written feedback and students' writing performance.

Keywords:  Writing, Teacher feedback, Socio-cultural theory, English language

Full Text:



Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (1994). Foreign language explanations within the zone of proximal development. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 532-557.

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x

Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 303-318. DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00024.

Berns, R. M. (2007). Child, Family, School, Community: Socialization and Support. (7thed.). Canada. Thomson Wadsworth.

Bultron, A. L. (2014). The use of teacher-written feedback and computer mediated feedback to enhance Puerto Rican English as a second language (ESL) high school students' essay writing (Published PhD Thesis). Universid ad Del Turabo.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–96. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students' writing. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT. Procedia-Socail and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445-452. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438.

Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33–53.

Ferris, D. & B. Roberts (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10(3), 161–184. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X.

Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143-162. DOI: 10.1080/01411920902894070.

Goldburg, M. E. (2012). ESL students' perceptions of their English writing proficiency and the effects of peer review training among their types of students in a community college ESL composition course (Published PhD Thesis). Alliant International University. San Diego.

Goldstein, L. M, & Conrad, Susan, M. (1990). Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-460.

Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141–163.

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006).Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jumu'ah, B. (2009). The effect of parental involvement on student achievement at Hillside High School Twilight Academy (Published PhD Thesis). University of Phoenix. USA.

Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Lee, I. (2008). Students’ reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144-164. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001.

Leki, I. (1990). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5-17.

Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2011). Teacher written feedback in EFL Yemen context: A qualitative case study of students' reactions and utilizations (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University Sains Malaysia. Malaysia.

Mahfoodh, O. H. H., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students' affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers' written feedback. English Language Teaching Journal, 4(3), 14-25. DOI:

Murphy, S. (2000). A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? Assessing Writing 7(1), 79-90. DOI:10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00019-2.

Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the feedback: Sociocultural interpretation of Saudi ESL learners' opinions about writing feedback. English Language Teaching. 5(3), 3-15. DOI:

Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher's verbal feedback on students' response: A Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 398-405. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.054.

Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Early Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Panahi, P., Birjandi, P., & Azabdatari, B. (2013). Towards a sociocultural approach to feedback provision in L2 writing classrooms: the alignment of dynamic assessment and teacher error feedback. Language Testing in Asia, 3(13), 1-10. DOI:10.1186/2229-0443-3-13.

Rahimi, M. (2009). The role of teachers' corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners' writing accuracy overtime: is learners' mother tongue relevant? Read and Writing, 22, 219-243. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-008-9139-5.

Rahimi, A. & Gheitasi, P. (2010). The interface between English teachers' sense of efficacy and their feedback on learners' writing, and learners' writing achievement. Procedia Social and behavioral Sciences, 5, 1932-1938. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.391.

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46–70.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher written feedback for L2 learners' writing development. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, 12(1), 7-17.

Thompson, C. L. (2009). The effect of writing evaluation on writing performance: A study in writing proficiency levels of fifth grade students (Published PhD Thesis).Tennessee State University. USA.

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.

Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 38(1), 38-52. DOI: 10.1177/0033688206076157.

Zhang, S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209–222. DOI:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.