Dehumanizing Communication Reified among Undergraduates and Lecturers: Issues and Suggestions

Duvie Adanma Nnekwu, Modebelu Melody Ndidi

Abstract


This paper discusses dehumanizing communication reified among undergraduates and t lecturers. Dehumanization is the act of degrading people with respect to their best qualities and denial of humanness to others. On the other hand, communication is human interaction and learning. Communication becomes rude when it is deliberately directed resulting in dehumanizing communication. The paper, therefore, examines dehumanizing communication in terms of its being intentional and unintentional and dehumanizing communication between lecturers and students and among students. It also took a swipe on the effects of dehumanizing communication on students and lecturers as well as proffer solutions to mitigating effect of dehumanizing communication between lecturer and students and among students. The suggested solutions among others include inter-group dialogue programme among contending groups in the student community, establishment of multicultural centers on campus in order to bring contending groups together (i.e. lecturers and students of all races and ethnicity). A compulsory course on “pedagogy of positiveness” is also recommended in the university curriculum to instill in the students the value of respecting people who may be different.

Keywords: Dehumanization, Intentional and Unintentional Communication, Reified, Lecturers, Undergraduates, Teaching and Learning, Classroom


Full Text:

PDF

References


American College of Health Association Report (2012). Available http://www.northwestern.edu/care/docs/NU%20CCSV%202012.pdf Accessed June 20, 2013.

Brown, G. G. (N.D). Definition of Communication. Available http://communicationtheory.org/definition-0f-communications Accessed June 3, 2013.

Costigan, G. (2009). The psychology of dehumanization. The University of Melbourne Voice, 5(6), 55-62. Availablehttp://archive.uninews.unimelb.edu.au/view-52043.html. Accessed May 10, 2013.

El-Farra, N. (1996). Arab and the media, Journal of Media Psychology 1 (2),spring. Available http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/sfischo/Arabs.htmlAccessed May 12, 2013.

Fourth Global Conference (2012). Bullying and Abuse of Power from Play Ground to International Relations. Salzburg- Austria. Available http://www.interdisciplinary.net/critical-issues/ethos/bullying Accessed May 12, 2013.

Gents, C. (2003). Reification and the Shaping of Paradigm of Control. Available http://www.academia.edu/1952364/Reification and the shaping of the paradigm of control Accessed April 23, 2013.

Gomes de Matos, F. (2001). Applying the Pedagogy of Positiveness to Diplomatic Communication Language and Diplomacy.

Hairston, K. R. (2008). Dehumanization of the black america female: An American/Hawaiian Experience. Space for Difference: An interdisciplinary journal Vol. 1 No 1 pp 65-85. Available http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/72m382mk.Accessed May 11, 2013.

Haslam, N. (2006) Dehumanisation: An Intergrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review Vol. 10 no 3 pp252-264. Availablehttp://www.general.utpb.edu/FAC/hughes_i/Haslam%20on%20dehumanisation. Accessed April 6, 2013.

Jihad, T. N, Tyrone, H. & Arman, R. (2012). Muslim and Arab student Campus climate at the University of California. Fact-Finding Team Report and Recommendations. Available http://www.universityofCalifornia.edu/news/documents/campus_climate_muslim-arab-pdf Accessed May 10 2013.

Khan Salman, R. (2012). OP-Ed: student Don’t learn from lectures. Available http://www.npr.org/2012/10/23/163480257/op-ed-students-dont-learn-from-lectures Accessed May 10, 2013.

Maiese, M. (2003). Beyond Intractability: Dehumanisation. Available http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/dehumanisation. Accessed June 10, 2013

Meyer, F. G. (n.d). Communication Theory. Available http://communicationtheory.org/definition-of communication. Accessed June 6, 2012.

Sandoval, F.V (2008) Technology and Dehumanisation. Available http://www.slideshare.net/ISPU_eductech/05technology-and- dehumanisation Accessed July 29, 2013.

Temasektimes (2012). Ex-MOE Teacher Recalls “Dehumanising” Experiences of Trainee Teachers. Available http://temasektimes.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/ex-moe-teacher-recalls-Dehumanising-of-trainee-teachers. Accessed Aug. 10, 2013.

Wikipedia Free Encyclopaedia (n.d) .Affective disposition theor. Available http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affective_disposition_theory.Accessed Aug. 10, 2013.

Worah, S., Douglas, S. McNaughton, D.& Kennedy, P. (2010) Augmentative and Alternative Communication Resource Guide For Teachers. Available http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/documents/aac_serc.pdf. Accessed Aug. 10, 2013.

WordNet (2006). Dehumanisation. WordNet @ 3.0 by Princeton University. Available http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dehumanisation. Accessed Aug. 10, 2013.

Zillmann, D. and Cantor, J. (1972). Directionality of transitory dominance as a communication variable affecting humor appreciation. Journal of personality and social psychology.24: 191-198


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.