X-Raying the Translation of Literary Style

Constantine Ngoran

Abstract


The complicated nature of literature is reflected in the complicated nature of literary style. If literature and literary style are difficult concepts to define with precision, their translation from one language to another should be expected to be either as complicated as the concepts themselves or even more complicated. The difficulty involved in the translation of literature and literary style is evidenced by the variety and diverse literary translation procedures translation scholars and researchers have proposed over the years. This paper attempts a review of some of the most prominent of these literary translation procedures and proposes a definite procedure for the translation of all literary works. The procedure involves analysis of the source text using various literary criticism approaches, identification of the stylistic devices or the indicators of style or what is sometimes called ‘stylistic invariants’ and then using basically foreignization or the literal translation procedure to translate all the identified indicators of style or stylistic devices, and domestication or oblique translation that should be used only where foreignization would be unintelligible and nonsensical. In other words, foreignization, operationalized through the literal translation procedure, calque and borrowing, should be the rule in the translation of literary works, while domestication or the oblique translation method should be the exception where lateral translation would be overtly incorrect.

Keywords


Domestication, Foreignization, Literary style, Translation procedures, Stylisitc decives

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, M. (Ed). (2001). Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies. Routledge

Boase-Beier J., & Holman M. (Eds.). (1999). The Practices of Literary Translation. St Jerome Publishing.

Cicero, M. (106-43BC). Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies, Routledge.

Cicero, M. (1976) De oratore/On the orator. In trans. E. Surton & H. Rachham vol. 14 of Cicero in twenty-eight volumes. Heinemann.

Gaddis Rose, M. (1997a). From translation analysis to literary translation. In Translation in the Humanities (pp. 34-36). Binghamton State University of New York.

Gaddis Rose, M. (1997b). Translation and Literary Criticism. St. Jerome Publishing

Galperin, I. (1971). Stylistics. Retrieved on 05/08/2022 from http//piglet16narod.ru/contents.htm

Goumovskaya, G. (2007.).’Stylistic Analysis Retrieved 05/08/20223F from http://eng:1septemberru/2007/08/:htmStylisticsT

Ji, M. (2008, April). A hybrid statistical-linguistic model of style shifting in literary translation. In AISB 2008 Convention Communication, Interaction and Social Intelligence (Vol. 1, p. 10).

Krause, M. (1995). More than mere words: Literary translation as literary interpretation, Proceedings of XIII FIT World Congress. London Institute of Translation and Interpretation, 1-9.

Kuepper, J. (1986). Literary translation and the problem of equivalency. Meta, 31, 224.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Luo, X. (1984). Essays on translation.

Massoud, M. F. (1988). Translate to Communicate, A Guide for Translators. New York: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Munday, J. (2001). Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. Routledge.

Nida, E. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden E.J. Brill.

Reiss, K. (2000). Translation Criticism- The Potentials and Limitations. St. Jerome Publishing.

Skrebnev, J. (2016) Fundamentals of English rom http//piglet16narod.ru/contents.htm

Song, C. (2003). Translation of literary style. Retrieved from Changchun: Jilin University (google)

Van den Broeck, R. (1985). Second thought on translation criticism: A model of its analytic function. In Hermans (Ed.), The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. Croom Helm.

Venuti, L. (1991). Genealogies of translation theory: Schleiermacher. TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction, 4(2), 125-150.

Vinay, J., & Darbelnet, J. (1958). Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais: Méthode de traduction. Beauchemin.

Wang, Q. (2010). Translating style: Constraints and creativity. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 406-411.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.