Email this article 
Ethical Intercultural Communication between the Western World and China
Abstract
Culture is the cumulative deposit of knowledge, traditions, beliefs acquired by a human community in the course of generations: ethics is one of the most important of such beliefs. As for the intercultural communication, the discipline which studies a cultural dialogue about various issues across different communities, since the eighties of the last century it has been the object of various theories, based on experimental data collections: among them the ‘Values Orientation Theory’ by F.R. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck, the ‘Cultural Dimensions Theory’ by G. Hofstede and the ‘Theory of Basic Values’ by S.H. Schwartz. One of the goals of this paper is to give a closer look at those theories. In the same period of time an ‘ethical turn’ manifested itself in western literary studies, after a long period of post-modernist disengagement, by initiative of J. Gardner, M. C. Nussbaum and J. Habermas, among others: the same happened in China in the eve of the new millennium, owing to the studies on comparative literature by Nie Zhenzhao. Literary works constitute an important vehicle of ethical intercultural communication. A second goal of the present paper is that of suggesting a ‘constructivist approach’ in the cultural dialogue between the western world and China, combining the results of those theoretical models with a comparative analysis of literary works chosen ad hoc, as recently done by Xu Zhilin in her comparative study of female images in ‘A leaf in the storm’, by Lin Yutang, and ‘Gone with the wind’, by Margareth Mitchell, from the perspective of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Theory.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Armstrong, A. (2002). European Reformation: 1500-1610. Heinemann Educational. Portsmouth, U.S.A.
Beiser, F. C., 2005. Hegel. Routledge, New York, U.S.A.
Bristow, W. (2017). Enlightenment. In Zalta, E.N.: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. PDF retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/enlightenment
Cantor, N.F. (1992). The civilization of the Middle Ages. Harper-Collins, New York, U.S.A.
Cardman, F. (2008). Early Christian Ethics. In S. Ashbrook & David G. Hunter (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, Oxford, U.K.
Cartwright, D. (2010). Schopenhauer: A Biography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Casmir, F.L. (1997). Ethics in Intercultural and International Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, U.S.A.
Chan, A.K.L. (2000). Confucian Ethics and the Critique of Ideology. Asian Philosophy, 10 (3): 245-261, Taylor & Francis, London, U.K.
Chen, X.M., Sheng, A.F. (2013). A survey of twentieth century literary theory and criticism in Chinese. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(6): article 14, Purdue University Press, .
Chen Z.G., Wang Y.L. & Wang J.Z. (1990). Value structures in China. Within- and cross-cultural comparisons. Paper presented at the 10th IACP Congress in Nara, Japan.
Clark, S. (2012). Ancient Mediterranean Philosophy: An Introduction. Bloomsbury, New York, U.S.A.
Confucius (1997). The Analects. Oxford University Press, U.K.
David, C.T. (2008). Cross-Cultural Management. 2nd Ed., SAGE, Los Angeles, U.S.A.
Edelglass, W. (2013). Buddhist Ethics and Western Moral Philosophy. In Emmanuel, S.M. (ed.): A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, pp. 476-490, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, U.S.A.
Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (2015). Logical Positivism. URL: https://www.britannica.com/topic/logical-positivism
Fang, T. (2003). A critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3 (3). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, U.S.A.
Felluga, D. (2013). General Introduction to Postmodernism. College of Liberal Arts, Purdue University Press. Retrieved from the PDF: https://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/postmodernism/modules/introduction.html.
Fowler, J. (2005). An Introduction to the Philosophy and Religion of Taoism. Sussex Academic Press, U.K.
Gardner, J. (1979). On moral fiction. Basic Books Inc., New York, U.S.A.
Gibbons, M.T. (1991). The Ethic of Postmodernism. Political Theory, 19 (1): 96-102, University of Virginia Press, U.S.A.
Gregory, M. (2011). Redefining Ethical Criticism. The Old vs. the New. In: JLTonline (24.01.2011). URL: http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/articles/article/view/287/879.
Ha, S. (2019). The Encounter between Cambridge Literary Criticism and China. International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translational Studies, 7(4): 34-39, Australian International Academic Centre, VICTORIA, Australia.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Introduction by Thomas A. McCarthy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Hills, M.D. (2002). Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Values Orientation Theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(4). PDF retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1040.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA, U.S.A.
Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 2. John Cantwell, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, California, U.S.A.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Second Edition. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, California, U.S.A.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: Hofstede’s Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2 (1). PDF retrieved from: https:// doi.org/10.9707/2307.0919.1014
Hofstede, G and Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius Connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16 (4): 5-21, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value orientation in the theory of action. In Parsons, T. and Shils, E.A. (Eds): Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.
Kluckhohn, F. and Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston, U.S.A.
Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant: a Biography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Leavis, F.R. (1948). The great tradition. Chatto & Windus, London, U.K.
Leiter, B. (1997). Nietzsche and the Morality Critics. Ethics, 107, 2: 250-285. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, U.S.A.
Liang, X.P. (2014). What on Earth is the ‘core value’ of a literary classic? A discussion with Nie Zhenzhao. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 3: 59, David Publishing Company, Wilmington, U.S.A.
Lin, Y.T. (1941). A leaf in the storm. John Day Company, New York, U.S.A.
Ly, A. (2012). A critical discussion of Hofstede’s concept of Power Distance. NHH Norwegian School of Economics, SYNAPS 28 (2013). Norway.
Mc Sweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, (55), 1: 89-118, SAGE Publications, London, U.K.
Mitchell, M. (1936). Gone with the wind. Warner Books, New York, U.S.A.
Nie, Z.Z. (2004). On Cambridge tradition of Criticism: with Leavis as an example. Foreign Literature Studies, 6 (8), Central China Normal University, Wuhan, P.R.C.
Nie, Z.Z. and Liu, F.L. (2014). A Study on Thomas Hardy. Yiling Press, Nanjing, P.R.C.
Nie, Z.Z. and Shang, B.W. (2014). Ethical Literary Criticism: East and West. Arcadia – DeGruyter:Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Literaturwissenschaft /International Journal for Literary Studies, 14,1, Berlin, Germany.
Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Nussbaum, M. (2001). The fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Shang, B.W. (2013). Ethical Criticism and Literary Studies. Comparative Literature and Culture, 15 (7): 2-6. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, U.S.A.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M.P. (Ed.): Advances in experimental social psychology, 25: 1-65. Academic Press. San Diego, U.S.A. PDF retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Schwartz, S.H. (2012). An overview of Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Reading in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). PDF retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.9707-0919.1116.
Schwartz, S.H. and Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 550-562.
Schwartz, S.H. and Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 878-891.
Searle, L. (2005). New Criticism. In M. Groden, M. Kreiswirth and I. Szeman (eds.): The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory, 2nd edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, U.S.A.
Thomas, D.C. (2008). Cross-cultural management. Essential concepts. SAGE Publishing, Newbury Park, U.S.A.
Tian, J.W. (2019). Nie Zhenzhao and the genesis of Chinese Ethical Literary Criticism. Comparative Literature Studies, 56 (2): 402-420, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, U.S.A.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2011). Intercultural communication ethics: Multiple layered issues. In: G. Cheney, S. May, D. (editors). The ICA (Intercultural Awareness ) Handbook of Communication Ethics, 335-352. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. Mahwah, U.S.A.
Williams, P. (1989). Mahayana Buddhism, Routledge, London, U.K.
Wong, D. (2016). Chinese Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
Xu, Z.L. (许芷羚) (2019). A Comparative Study of the Female Images between “A Leaf in the storm” and “Gone with the wind” from the perspective of Cultural Dimension. School of Foreign Languages, Graduation Thesis, Guangzhou University, P.R.C.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.8n.1p.38
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.