Recreating the Image of a “Chaste Wife”: A Multi-functional Analysis of Two Translations of Li Po’s Changgan Xing

Shilong Tao, Xi Chen

Abstract


This article investigates the image of a “chaste wife” recreated in two English translations of ancient Chinese poet Li Po’s Changgan Xing from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics (SFL). Based on three metafunctions of SFL, respectively ideational, interpersonal and textual, the linguistic choices of the poet and translators are measured from the transitivity and text complexity on what the wife does and how she organizes her thoughts; from the mood and modality on how she interacts with her husband, and the theme and rheme on how she unfolds and foregrounds her concerns. Since translating is a process of making choices, the analysis shows that both translations reproduce the first and second level of poetic themes about love in the original poem but lose the third political theme. Besides, Pound tends to follow an imaginative and creative translation, thus recreating a bashful and innocent image of a young “chaste wife” in a direct and explicit way, while Waley aims at literal translation and presents a more courageous and considerate image of a mature “chaste wife” in a relatively complex and implicit way. It is argued that the context of translation, including the translator’s knowledge of the source language, translation strategies and intended readers, plays an important role in the translator’s seemingly unconscious choices of interpreting and presenting poetic themes, thus recreating different images of a same character.

Keywords


Systemic Functional Linguistics, Changgan Xing, Image, Chaste Wife, Context, Li Po

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butt, D., & Rhondda F., et al. (2012). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carballeira, H.M. (2003). Language and Characterization in Mercè Rodoreda’s La Plaça del Diamant. The Translator. 9(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2003.10799147

Chen, X. (2008). An Ethical Reading of “Chang Gan Xing” and “The River-Merchant’s Wife: A Letter”. Foreign Literature Studies. 2, 141-147.

Croft, W. (1994). Speech Act Classification, Language Typology and Cognition. In S.L. Tsohatzidis (ed), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, 460-477.

Dang, M. (2003). Ezra Pound’s Imagist Style in Translating a Chinese Poem as Seen from The River-Merchant’s Wife: A Letter. Foreign Language Education. 05, 61-64. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TEAC200305013.htm

Dong, T. & Lin, X. (2018). Attitude in Appraisal Theory: a Comparative Analysis of English Versions of Changgan Xing. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies. 6(1), 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.6n.1p.42

Eliot, T.S. (1928/1959). “Introduction” to Ezra Pound: Selected Poems. T.S. Eliot (ed.). London: Faber & Faber.

Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Functional Diversity in Language as Seen From a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English. Foundations of language. 6(3), 322–361.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: A Symposium. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 330–368.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Huang, G. (2002). Logical Metafunction Analysis in English Versions of Du Mu’s Qing Ming. Foreign Language and Translation. 1, 1-6.

Hasan, R. (1988). The Analysis of One Poem: Theoretical Issues in Practice. In D. Birch and M. O’Toole (eds.). Functions of Style. London: Pinter, 45-73.

Levý, J. (2012). Translation as a Decision Process. Scientia Traductionis. 11, 72-96.

Li, E.S.H. (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese. London: Continuum.

Lian, S. (1997). Contrastive Studies of English and Chinese. Beijing: High Education Press.

Lin, B. (2015). Using SFL in an Appliable Stylistics: Exploring Verbal Artistry and Its Implications for Poetic Translation. Linguistics and the Human Sciences. 10(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10i1.27275

Lü, S. (1999). Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight Hundred Characters in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Malmkjær, K. (2003). What Happened to God and the Angels: An Exercise in Translational Stylistics. Target. 15(1), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.1.03mal

Matthiessen, C. M.I.M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.

Matthiessen, C. M.I.M. (2009). Ideas and new directions. In M.A.K. Halliday & J.J. Webster (eds.). Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London & New York: Continuum, 12-58.

Munday, J. (2016). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications (4th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.

Nida, E.A. (1982). Translating Meaning. California: English Language Institute.

Nida, E.A., & Taber, C.R. (2003). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Boston: Brill.

Pound, E. (1915). Cathay. London: Elkin Mathews, 11-12.

Pound, E. (1972). “A Retrospect.” Twentieth Century Literary Criticism: A Reader. David Lodge (ed.). London: Longman.

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London and New York: Routledge.

Smith, K. (2004). I Am Me, but Who Are You and What Are We?: The Translation of Personal Pronouns and Possessive Determiners in Advertising Texts. Multilingua. 23(3), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.013

Tang, J. (2011). Ezra Pound’s The River Merchant’s Wife: Representations of a Decontextualized “Chineseness”. Meta. 56(3), 526-537. http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1008331ar

Tao, S. (2019). Recreating the Image of a “Chaste Wife”: Transitivity in Two Translations of Chinese Ancient Poem Jie Fu Yin. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 9(11), 1433-1441. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0911.09

Toolan, M.J. (1988). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

Toury, G. (2012). Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Waley, A. (1918). A Hundred and Seventy Chinese Poems. London: Constable and Company Ltd. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/42290/42290-h/42290-h.htm

Waley, A. (1919). The Poet Li Po A.D.701-762. London: East and West Ltd.

Waley, A. (1956). Yuan Mei: The 18th Century Chinese Poet. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

Yang, Y. (2011). Comparative Studies on Hypotaxis and Parataxis of English and Chinese Grammar. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science). 38(01), 120-124.

Yu, H., & Wu, C. (2016a). Same Chan Master, Different Images: Multi-functional Analysis of the Story of Huineng and Its Translations. Journal of Translation Studies. 17(4), 143-180. https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2016.17.4.006

Yu, H., & Wu, C. (2016b). Recreating the Image of Chan Master Huineng: the Roles of MOOD and MODALITY. Functional Linguistics. 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0027-z

Yu, H., & Wu, C. (2017). Text Complexity as an Indicator of Translational Style: a Case Study. Linguistics and the Human Science. 13(1-2), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.35709

Zhang, B. (2012). A Multidimensional Analysis of Ezra Pound’s Artistic Translation of an Ancient Chinese Poem. Foreign Language Research. 5, 77-81. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-NWYJ201205013.htm




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.7n.4p.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.