Evaluation of Two Popular EFL Coursebooks

Manoochehr Jafarigohar, Esmaeil Ghaderi


This study investigates two EFL coursebooks commonly taught in Iran, namely Topnotch and Total English. Thirty three teachers with minimum one year experience of teaching the two books evaluated them using a checklist of the evaluation of EFL coursebooks. Analysis of the obtained data by t-test showed that the difference between the two coursebooks was statistically significant in some criteria. Teachers were more satisfied with Topnotch than Total English in the criteria such as language components, tasks, activities, exercises, and critical discourse analysis features. On the other hand, they were more satisfied with Total English than the other coursebook in a criterion considered as general considerations. The difference between the two coursebooks was not significant in some criteria including structures, skills, and teacher’s manual. Findings of the study can be beneficial for the authors of the two coursebooks, EFL teachers, curriculum and material developers, administrators of language institutes, and also students interested in learning EFL.



Topnotch, Total English, EFL coursebook, evaluation

Full Text:



Alemi, M., & Isavi, E. (2012). Evaluation of interactional metadiscourse in EFL textbooks. Advances in Asian Social Science (AASS), 2(1), 422-430.Retireved January 2, 2013, from www.worldsciencepublisher.org

Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-13.

Altman, W.S., Ericksen, K., & Pena-Shaff, J. (2006). An inclusive process for departmental textbook selection. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4), 228-231. Available online at http://proquest.com

Azizfar, A., Koosha, M., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 36-44. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.010

Bell, J., & Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.). Material development in language teaching (pp. 116-129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J.D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001) The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinmann.

Dominguez, L. M. (2003). Gender textbook evaluation. MA thesis, Centre for English Language Studies, University of Birmanham. Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http;//www.brimingham.ac.uk. documents/collegeartslaw/cels/essays/sociolinguistics/dominguez5.pdf

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42.

Fairclough, N., & Holes, C. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Florent, J., & Walter, C. (1989). A Better role for women in TEFL. ELT Journal, 43(3), 180-184.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Hamiloğlu, K., & Karlıova, H. (2009). Content analysis on the vocabulary presentation in EFL coursebooks. Ozean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1). Retrieved Janaury3, 2013, from http://ozelacademy.com/OJSS_v2n1_4.pdf

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English language teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Hutchison, T., & Torres E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315 –328.

Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. ELT Journal, 9 (2), 130-150.

Kachru, B. B. (1985) Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H.G. Widdowson (Eds), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp.11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kayapinar, U. (2009). Coursebook evaluation by English teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(1), 69-78.

Kearsey, J., & Turner, S. (1999). Evaluating textbooks: The role of genre analysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 35-43.

Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse, in B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp.190-216), Cambridge:CUP.

Litz, D. R. A. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study (Doctoral Desertion). Retrieved November 5, 2012, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Litz_thesis.pdf

Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (2nd Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Rutledge.

Porecca, K.L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18 (4), 705-724.

Prabhu, N.S. (1989). Materials as support: Materials as constraint. Guidelines, 11(1), 66–74.

Ranalli, J. C. (2002). An evaluation of New Headway upper-intermediate. University of Birmingham. Retrieved December 20, 2012, from http://www.cels.bham. ac.uk/ resources/essays/Ranalli3.pdf

Razmjoo, S.A. (2010). Developing a textbook evaluation scheme for the expanding circle. Iranain Journal of Applied Langauge Studies. 12(1), 121-136.

Riazi, A.M. (2003). What do textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation shemes of three decades. In W. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology & materials design in language teaching (pp. 52-68). Singapore SEMEO: Regional Center.

Riazi, M., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language,3(4), 1-16.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sahragard, R., Rahimi, A., & Zaremoayeddi, I. (2009). An in-depth evaluation of interchange series (3rd edition). Porta Linguarum, 12(1), 37-54.

Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432-453). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5 (9), 508-517.

Tomlinson, B. (2001). Materials development. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Ed.), The Cambridge guide to teaching. English to speakers of other languages (pp. 66-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2). Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www- writing.berkeley. edu/tesl-ej/ej30/a3.html

Weir, C. J., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.

Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-255.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.6p.194


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.