Multiple Interpretations of EFL Learners’ Silence in the Iranian Context

Reza Ghaffar Samar, Elham Yazdanmehr

Abstract


Attention to silence as part of the communicative discourse was first drawn in Sack’s (1974) paper, in which it was perceived as a linguistic and communicative form, and from the functional point of view as capable of expressing ideational, interpersonal, and textual functions. Awareness of multiple functions of silence including the referential, emotive, conative, phatic, poetic and metalanguage is of greater significance when it comes to language learning settings, where learners from a different cultural background from the target language are present to learn that language.  In such contexts, awareness of various functions of silence and correct interpretation of it is essential in teacher-student rapport. This paper aims to, first, provide an introduction to the multiple functions of silence in general and then to investigate these functions in EFL classes of Iran’s private language institutes. The researchers’ own teaching experience along with class observations and 2 phases of interview with teachers of those classes comprise the research data. Findings were indicative of teachers’ lack of awareness of diverse communicative functions of silence in class and that this awareness could be raised through the informal interview phases. This paper attests to the fact that not all learner’s silence should be interpreted negatively as lack of attention or knowledge. Teachers need to be aware of the salient meanings of silence in their EFL class and take an appropriate reactive step accordingly.

 


Keywords


Silence, Jakobson’s communicative model, culture, EFL, Iran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bruneau, T. J. (1973). Communicative silences: forms and functions. The Journal of Communication 23, 17–46. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00929.x

Chapple, E. D. (1939). Quantitative analysis of the interaction of individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 25 (2), 58–67. http://dx.doi.org/ PMC1077712

Dauenhauer, B. P. (1980). Silence – The phenomenon and its ontological significance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ephratt, M. (2011). Linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic speech and silence. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 2286-2307. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.006

Ephratt, M. (2008). The functions of silence. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1909-1938. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009

Ephratt, M. (2012). ‘‘We try harder’’ – Silence and Grice’s cooperative principle, maxims and implicatures. Language and Communication 32, 62-79. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.09.001.

Goldman-Ersler, F. (1958). The predictability of words in context and the length of pauses in speech. Language and Speech 1, 226–231. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00334.x

Hawkins, P. R. (1971). The syntactic location of hesitation pauses. Language and Speech 14. 277–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002383097101400308

Hebert, L. (2011). The functions of language. Retrieved from http://www.signosemio.com/jakobson/functions-of-language.asp

Hu, Y., & Fell-Eisenkraft, S. (2003). Immigrant Chinese students’ use of silence in the language arts classroom: perceptions, reflections, and actions. Teaching and Learning 17(2). 55-65.

Jakobson R. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in Language. New York: Wiley.

Jaworski, A. (2006). Silence. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd Ed.). pp. 377-379.

Jones, J. F. (1999). From silence to talk: cross-cultural ideas on students' participation in academic group discussion. English for Specific Purposes 18(3). 243-259. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00059-8

Ling, W. N. (2003). Communicative functions and meanings of silence: an analysis of cross-cultural views. Retrieved from http://www.lang.nagoya-u.ac.jp/bugai/kokugen/tagen/tagenbunka/vol3/wong3.pdf

Mushin, I., & Gardner, R. (2009). Silence is talk: conversational silence in Australian Aboriginal talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 2033-2052. http://dx.doi.org/ 10: 2033-2052.

Nakane, I. (2006). Silence and politeness in intercultural communication in university seminars. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1811-1835. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.01.005

Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.

Trent, M. (2010). Communication. Retrieved from http://www.lulu.com/shop/mel-trent/communication/ebook/product-18594900.html.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.6p.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.