English Language Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs: Validation of the Instrument

Reza Rezvani, Tayebe Amiri


Despite the vast studies on the measurement of teachers’ sense of efficacy, little has been done in the domain of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). Hence, this study was motivated by a practical need to develop and validate a teacher efficacy questionnaire in TEFL. To this end, the questionnaire (English Language Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs Questionnaire (ELTEBQ)) was developed through semi-structured interviews with English university instructors of universities in Iran and a review of relevant literature. In order to validate the instrument it was administrated to 65 English language instructors. The result of factor analysis revealed a six-factor solution with a reliability index (Cronbach’s Alpha) of 0.82.



English language instructors, Teacher efficacy, Factor analysis

Full Text:



Anderson, R., Greene, M., & Loewen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34 (2), 148-165.

Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A. Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Ashton, P., Olejnik, S., Crocker, L., & McAuliffe, M. (1982, September). Measurement problems in the study of teachers’ sense of efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B., (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from http://www.gigapedia.com.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII. Factors affecting implementation and continuation (Rep. No. R-1589/7-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432).

Borich, G.D. (1996). Effective teaching methods (3rd ed.). NewYork: Macmillan Medley, D. (1979). The effectiveness of teachers. In P.L. Petreson & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 11-27). Berkeley: McCutchan.

Brand, B.R., Glasson, G.E., & Green, A.M. (2006). Sociocultural factors influencing students’ learning in science and mathematics: An analysis of the perspectives of African American students. School Science and Mathematics, 106(5), 228-236.

Brophy J. and Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp.328-375). NewYork: McMillan.

Covino, E.A., & Iwanicki, E. (1996). Experienced teachers: Their constructs on effective teaching. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 325–363.

Dembo, M.H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 173-184.

DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2ed ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dornyei, z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwal, NewJersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://www.gigapedia.com.

Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan.

Emmer, E.T., Evertson, C.M., & Anderson, L.M. (1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year. The Elementary School Journal, 80(5), 219–231.

Enochs, L.G., Posnanski, T., & Hagedorn, E. (1999). Science teaching self-efficacy beliefs: Measurement, recent research, and directions for future research. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Education, Boston, MA.

Everston, C.M., Emmer, E.T., & Brophy, J.E. (1980). Predictors of effective teaching in junior high mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 11, 167-178.

Ferguson, D.F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465–498.

Ferguson, D.F. & Ladd, H.F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In: Ladd, H.F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 265– 298). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Fetler, M. (1999). High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(9).

Galton, M. (1987). Change and continuity in the primary school: The research evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 13(1), 81-94.

Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. (1984), Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-82.

Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., Woolfolk, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507

Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1984). Looking into classrooms (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

Guskey, T.R. (1981). Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 44-51.

Guskey, T.R. (1982). Differences in teachers’ perceptions of personal control of positive versus negative student learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 70-80.

Guskey, T.R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81(1), 41-47.

Guskey, T.R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69.

Guskey, T.R., & Passaro, P.D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.

Harris, S. (2003). An andragogical model: Learning through life experiences. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 40(1), 38–41.

Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, E. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: HarperCollins.

Johnson, B.L. (1997). An organizational analysis of multiple perspectives of effective teaching: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 69–87.

Kagan, D.M. (1992). Professional growth among pre-service and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62 (2), 129 –169.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post-method pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 537-560.

Labone, E. (2004) Teacher efficacy: Maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 341–359.

Langer, J. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 837–880.

Medley, D. (1979). The effectiveness of teachers. In P.L. Petreson & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 11-27). Berkeley: McCutchan.

Meyer, W.J. (1985). Summary, integration, and prospective. Chapter 14 in J.B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher Expectancies (pp. 353-371). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Miller, L.J. (2006). Miller function and participation scales manual. Santa Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125- 145.

Murnane, R.J. & Phillips, B.R. (1981). Learning by doing, vintage, and selection: Three pieces of the puzzle relating teaching experience and teaching performance. Economics of Education Review, 1(4), 453–65.

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328

Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Oppenheim, A.N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement (New Edition). London: Pinter.

Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.

Peart, N.A., & Campbell, F. A. (1999). At-risk students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 5(3), 269–284.

Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589 – 618.

Popham, W.J. (2002). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Raudenbush, S.W. (1984). Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational psychology, 76, 85-97.

Rezvani, R. (2010). Modeling test-taking strategies and their relationship to translation test performance: A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Shiraz University: Shiraz, Iran.

Richards, J.C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. United Stated: Cambridge University Press.

Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625-638.

Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rose, J.S., & Medway, F.J. (1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 185-190.

Rosenshine, B. & Furst, N. (1973). Research on teacher performance criteria. In B.O. Smith (Ed.), Research in teacher education: A symposium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.

Schraw, G. (2001). Current themes and future directions in epistemological research: A commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 451-464.

Schunk, D.H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Shellard, E. & Protheroe, N. (2000). Effective teaching: How do we know it when we see it? The Informed Educator Series. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services.

Skrla, L. (2001). The influence of state accountability on teacher expectations and student performance. UCEA: The Review, 42(2), 1–4.

Spada, N., Barkaovi, K., Peteres, C., So, M., & Valeo, A. (2009). Developing a questionnaire to investigate second language learners' performance for two types of form-focused instruction. System, 37, 70-81.

Spss for Windows (Version 18) [Computer software]. Chicago: Spss Inc.

Strauss, R.P. & Sawyer, E.A. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41-48.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A.W., & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-48. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.

Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.

Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality Princeton, NJ: Millikan Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service.

Wineburg, S.S. (1987). The self-fulfillment of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Educational Researcher, 16, 28-37.

Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to examining efficacy in teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Wubbels, T., Levy, J., & Brekelmans, M. (1997). Paying attention to relationships. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 82–86.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.4p.14


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.