What Do Language Teachers Think about Interchange and American English File? Teacher’s Evaluation of Two ESL Textbooks in Iran

Hassan Soleimani, Esmaeil Ghaderi

Abstract


Materials evaluation is a critically significant feature of a coherent curriculum to achieve the objectives of pedagogy. To this end, two EFL textbooks commonly taught in language institutes in Iran, namely Interchange series and American English File, were selected for evaluation, seeking teachers’ viewpoints on the effectiveness of the two textbooks. Thirty EFL teachers who had used these two textbooks in their teaching experience participated in the study. A modified version of Litz’s (2005) teacher textbook evaluation form was used to collect data. Analysis of the collected data showed that the teachers were satisfied with the two materials. Moreover, it was found that the difference between the two textbooks was not significant in four features including practical considerations, layout and design, activities, and skills but this difference was significant in two features including language type as well as subject and content. The authors of the two textbooks, the administrators of language institutes, curriculum and material developers, and also students interested in learning EFL can benefit from the findings of this study.

 


Keywords


Interchange, American English File, curriculum, textbook evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-13.

Altman, W.S., Ericksen, K., & Pena-Shaff, J. (2006). An inclusive process for departmental textbook selection. Teaching of Psychology, 33(4), 228-231. Available online at: http://proquest.com.

Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8 (2). Retrieved September 3, 2012, from http://www.iteslj.org/

Azizfar, A., Koosha, M., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.010

Bell, J., & Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.). Material development in language teaching (pp. 116-129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Breen, M.P., & Candlin. C.N. (1987). Which materials? A consumer’s and designer’s guide. In L. E. Sheldon (Ed.), ELT textbooks and materials. Problems in evaluation and development (pp. 13-28). Oxford: Modern English Publications.

Brown, J.D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Candlin, C.N., & Breen, M.P. (1979). Evaluating, adapting and innovating language teaching materials. In C. Yorio, K. Perkins and J. Schacter (Eds.), On TESOL '79: The learner in focus (pp. 86-108). Washington, D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

Carrell, D., & Korwitz, J. (1994). Using concordancing techniques to study gender stereotyping in ELT textbooks. In: Sunderland J. (Ed.), Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English language education. Prentice Hall International.

Chastain, K. (1971). The development of modern language skills: Theory to practice (pp. 376-384). Philadelphia. The Center for Curriculum Development.

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinmann.

Dahmardeh, M. (2009). Communicative textbooks: English language textbooks in Iranian secondary high schools. Linguistik, 40 (4), 45-61.

Daoud, A., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. In M. Celce-Murcia and L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 302-307). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

Davatgarzadeh,G.(2007). The representation of social actors in Interchange third edition series: A critical discourse analysis with respect to the socio-semantic features. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42.

Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson. (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 218 – 223). Cambridge University Press.

Florent, J., & Walter, C. (1989). A better role for women in TEFL. ELT Journal, 43(3), 180-184.

Gordani, Y. (2010). An analysis of English textbooks used at Iranian guidance schools in terms of Bloom’s taxonomy. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7( 2), 249-278.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Gray, J. (2000). The ELT coursebook as cultural artifact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT Journal, 54(3), 274-283.

Harmer, J. (1996). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.

Hutchison, T., & Torres E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315 –328.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Iraji, A. (2007). Pragmatic features of New Interchange: How communicative and task-based it is. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.

Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. ELT Journal, 9 (2), 130-150.

Kearsey, J., & Turner, S. (1999). Evaluating textbooks: The role of genre analysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 35-43.

Khormaei, A. (2005). Lexis in English textbooks in Iran, analyses of exercises and proposals for consciousness-raising activities.Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran

Lamie, J. M. (1999). Making the textbook more communicative. The Internal TESL Journal, 5(1). Retrieved September 27, 2012, from www.iteslj.org.

Littlejohn, A. (1996). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson, (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 191-213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Litz, D. R. A. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Litz_thesis.pdf

Long, M. H. (1990). Task, Group, and Task-Group Interaction' in S. Anivan (Ed.), Language teaching methodology for the Nineties. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language Program Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (2nd Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Morgan, T. (2003). IELTS preparation materials. ELT Journal, 57(1), 66-76.

Mukundan, J., & Ahour, T. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970-2008). In Tomlinson, B., Masuhara, H. (Eds.), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 336-352). London: Continuum.

Oxenden, C., Latham-Koenig, C., & Seligson, P. (2008). American English file. USA: Oxford University Press.

Prabhu, N. S. (1989). Materials as support: Materials as constraint. Guidelines 11, 1: 66–74.

Razmjoo, S. A. (2007). High schools or private institutes textbooks? Which fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian context? Asian EFL Journal, 9(4). 126-140.

Razmjoo, S.A. (2010). Developing a textbook evaluation scheme for the expanding circle. Iranain Journal of Applied Language Studies,12(1), 121-136.

Riazi, A.M. (2003). What do textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation shemes of three decades. In W. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology & materials design in language teaching. pp. 52-68. Singapore SEMEO: Regional Center.

Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond Training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C., Hull, J., & Proctor, S. (2005). Interchange (3rd Edition).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dctionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman.

Sarhady, T. (2009). A critical approach to English material development and language planning in Iran. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 143-153.

Sheldon, L. (1998). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432-453). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Soozandehfar, S.M., & Sahargard, R. (2012).A textbook evaluation of speech acts and language functions in Top-Notch series. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 1(12), 1831-1838.

Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5 (9), 508-517.

Tomlinson, B. (2001). Materials development. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Ed.), The Cambridge guide to teaching. English to speakers of other languages (pp. 66-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.010

Tomlinson, B. (2003), Materials evaluation, in B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.

Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13, 355-361.

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice & theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-255.

Xu, I. H. (2004). Investigating criteria for assessing ESL textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved April 2012 from: http://proquest.umi.com.

Yakhontova, T. (2001). Textbooks, contexts, and learners. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 397-415. Retrieved April 2012 from: www.elsevier.com/locate/esp.

Yarmohammadi, L (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the Iranian Academy of Science, 18, 70-87.

Zare Asl, H. R. (2007). A comparative in-depth evaluation of two preuniversity English textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.5p.42

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.