Innovations and Reproduction in Second Language (L2) New Media: A Discursive- Semiotic Study of Selected SMS Text Messages in Nigeria

Tunde Opeibi, Aina Oluwasola

Abstract


Since the turn of the new millennium, the new media has continued to alter the communication configuration in modern societies. The social media tools have been influencing the way we interact and communicate. These wireless networks have confirmed that our world has indeed become a global village by creating a superhighway for communication possibilities never witnessed in human history. While scholars  have explored the roles of  some of the new media platforms e.g. Facebook  blogging, and twitter for private and public discourses(e.g., Taiwo, 2010; Presley, 2010, 2012),  previous studies in the use of SMS in Nigeria have concentrated more on sociolinguistic, lexical, or morpho-syntactic  features of text messages (e.g., Awonusi, 2004; Chiluwa, 2010). The present study, however, considers aspects of the new media discourse strategies as resources in a second language setting that demonstrate users’ bilingual creativity. It adopts a discursive-semiotic approach in its analytical paradigm to examine how participants, sharing the mobile protocols, deploy linguistic and non-linguistic facilities as well as contextual resources to create relationship and to enact meaning. The approaches of Discourse Analysis (DA) and Semiotics (Schiffrin, 1994; Chandler, 2001) as well as insight from Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC), and Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis (CMDA)(Herring 2001, 2004;  O’Riley, 2005;  Herring, 2007) provide the theoretical underpinning for this study.  CMC and CMDA, for instance, have been used as tool kits to study and   to explain how the new media technologies influence the strategies with which language users within a given virtual sphere engage a wide range of audience through the virtual protocols. The study finds that the use of text messages has opened up creative ways of deploying the resources of a non-native language (English) among bilinguals in Nigeria. The outcome of this innovative and reproduction process confirms the emergence of varieties of new media-based discursive practices in English that reflect the socio-cultural contexts of the communicative event.  


Keywords


New media; discursive-semiotic features; discourse strategies; Text messages (SMS); bilingual creativity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Androutsopoulos, J. and Beißwenger, M. (2008). Introduction: Data and Methods in Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. Language @ Internet 5, Article 2, Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1609

Awonusi, S. (2004). ‘Little’ Englishes and The Law of Energetics: A Sociolinguistic Study of SMS Text Messages as Register and Discourse in Nigerian English. In S. Awonusi & E.A. Babalola (Eds.), The Domestication of English (pp 45-62). Lagos: University of Lagos Press.

Awonusi, S. (1987). The Identification of Standards of Written Institutionalized Non-Native Englishes. LARES, Vol. 1X, 47-61.

Bastian, M. (1999). Nationalism in a Virtual Space:Immigrants Nigerians on the Internet. West African Review, 1,1 Retrieved from [iuicode:http://www.icaap.org/iuicode?101.1.1.2].

Bernatchez , E. (2008). "What does SMS Text Messages mean?". About, Inc., The New York Times Company. http://www.about.com Retrieved 12/10/2012

Brinker, K. (2001). Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden (5 Aufl.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.

Castells, M. (ed.) (2004). The Network Society: a cross-cultural perspective. Surrey: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/22569675/The-Network-Society-a-Cross-cultural-perspective-Manuel-Castells-ed

Chandler,D. (2001). Semiotics for Beginners. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/semiotic.html

Chiad, M. O. (2008). Structural and Linguistic Analysis of SMS Text Messages. Journal of Kerbala University, Humanities.Vol 6, No 4.

Chiluwa, I. (2010). Nigerian English in Informal Email Messages. English World-wide 31(1), 40-61

Cook, G. (1992). The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.

Coleman, R., Lieber, P., Mendelson, A.L., & Kurpius, D.D. (2008) Public Life and the Internet: If You Build a Better Website, Will Citizens Become Engaged?, New Media & Society (10)2: 179-201.

Eid, M. & Ward, S. (2009). Ethics, New Media, and Social Networks. Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1-4 retrieved from http://www.gmj.uottawa.ca/0901/v2i1_eid%20and%20ward.pdf)

Fasold, R. (1990). Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Faulkner, X. & Culwin, F. (2005). When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers. 17/2, 167-185.

Grinter, R. E. & Eldridge, M. A. (2001). Y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 219-238). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Herring, S. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. Language@Internet,4, article 1. Retrieved from http://languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd Edition). New York: Arnold.

Halliday, M. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. London: Oxford University Press.

Herring, S. (2004). Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. An Approach to Researching Online Behaviour. In S.A. Barab, R. Kling & J. Gray (Eds.) Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, (pp. 338-376) New York:Cambridge University Press.

Herring, S.(2001). Computer-Mediated Discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Heidi (Eds.) Handook of Discourse Analysis(pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.

Ifukor, P. (2011). Linguistic Marketing in“ ... a market place of ideas”: Language Choice and intertextuality in a Nigerian virtual community. Pragmatics & Society, 2:1, 109-147

Ifukor, P. (2010). Elections or Selections? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society.

Ifukor, P. (2009). Codeswitching as Facework in Computer-Media Discourse, Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics(AAAL) Annual Conference, Denver, USA.

Ifukor, P. (2008) Face Claims in Weblogs. Paper Presented at the First Triennial Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE), University of Freiburg, Germany.

Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Leppanen, S. &.Peurenon, S. (2012). Multilingualism on the Internet. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism. London: Routledge.

Muthusamy P. (2009). Communicative functions and reasons for code switching: A Malaysian perspective. Retrieved from www.crisaps.org/newsletter/summer2009/Muthusamy.doc

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

Opeibi, O. B. (2011). Discourse Strategies in Political Campaigns in Nigeria. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Pierce, C.S. (1931) Collected Papers - 1931 - 58 (8 Vols.), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Sarrazin, T. (2011). Texting, Tweeting, Mobile Internet: New Platforms for Democratic Debate in Africa. Namibia: Fesmedia Africa, Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/africa media/08343.pdf.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse Analysis. London: Blackwell

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: A Sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tagg, C. (2009). A corpus linguistics study of sms text messaging. Unpublished Thesis. The University of Birmingham. Retrieved from http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/253/1/Tagg09PhD.pdf

Taiwo, R. (2010b). Social Identity and Discursive Practices in Nigerian Online Forums. In N. Ekeanyanwu & C. Okeke(Eds.) Indigenous Societies and Cultural Globalization in the 21st Century (pp. 70-91). Leipzig: VDM Verlag.

Taiwo, R. (2010a). Discourse Features in Nigerian Online Discussion Forums. In P. Jung-ian & E.G. Abels (Eds.). Interpersonal Relations and Social Patterns in Communication Technologies: Discourse Norms, Language Structures and Cultural Variables (185-201). Philadelphia, Penna: IGI Global Publishers.

Thorne, S. (2007). Computer-Mediated Communication. Retrieved from https://www.surfgroepen.nl/sites/languageducation/Shared%20Documents Articles%20LE/Computer%20Mediated%20Communication/Thorne_CMC_2007.pdf.

Thornton, A. (2002). Does Internet Create Democracy? Retrieved from http://www.zipworld.com.au/~athornto/thesis2.htm. accessed on 30/10/2012

Thurlow, C. & Brown, A. (2003). Generation Txt? The Sociolinguistics of Young People’s text-messaging. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/thurlow

Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research 23, 3–43.

Wei, J. M. (2003). Codeswitching in Campaigning Discourse: The Case of Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian in Language and Linguistics, 4.1: 139-165. Retrieved from www.scu.edu.tw/english/teachers/wei/article2.doc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-mediated_communication

Newspapers (Nigeria): The Punch, October 5, 2012, p.2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.2p.122

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.