Process-Product Approach to Writing: the Effect of Model Essays on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy

Parastou Gholami Pasand, Eshrat Bazarmaj Haghi

Abstract


Writing is one the most important skills in learning a foreign language. The significance of being able to write in a second or foreign language has become clearer nowadays. Accordingly, different approaches to writing such as product approach, process approach and more recently process-product approach came into existence and they have been the concern of SL/FL researchers. The aim of this study is to answer the question that whether the use of an incomplete model text in process-product approach to writing and asking the learners to complete the text rather than copying it can have a positive impact on EFL learners’ accuracy in writing. After training a number of EFL learners on using process approach, we held a two-session writing class. In the first session students wrote in the process approach, and in the second one they were given a model text to continue in the process-product approach. The writing performance of the students in these two sessions was compared in term of accuracy. Based on the students’ writing performance, we came to the conclusion that completing the model text in process-product writing can have a rather positive influence in some aspects of their writing accuracy such as punctuation, capitalization, spelling, subject-verb agreement, tense, the use of connectors, using correct pronouns and possessives. Also the results of the paired t-test indicate that using a model text to continue increased students’ writing accuracy.

 


Keywords


EFL writing, process-product approach, model text, writing accuracy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.

Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27-51.

Erel, S. & Bulut, D. (2007). Error treatment in L2 writing: A comparative study of direct and indirect coded feedback in Turkish EFL context. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı , 22(1), 397-415.

Matsuda P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In Kroll (Ed.) Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Montague, N. (1995). The process oriented approach to teaching writing to second language learners. New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal. 10(2), 13-24.

Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: the writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, 6(2).

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. U.S.: Heinle & Heinle

Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47(1), 101-143.

Saeidi, M., Sahebkheir, F. (2011). The effect of model essays on accuracy and complexity of EFL learners’ writing performance. Middle- East Journal of Scientific Research, 10(1), 130- 137.

Schmitt, N. (2002). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. (Ed.). London: Arnold & Oxford University Press.

Sutikno, M.K. (2008). Responding to students’ writing. (Teaching writing or assessing it?). Journal Pendidikan Penabur, 10(7), 51-59.

Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students’ writing skills for English major students. ABAC Journal, 28 (2), 1-9.

Torghabeh, R.A., Hashemi, M.R., & Ahmadi, H, Sh. (2010). Writing through literature: a novel approach to EFL writing instruction. Iranian EFL Journal, 6(4), 7-23.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.75

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.