A Brief Review of Theoretical Underpinnings, Definitions and Typical Configurations of Collaborative Writing

Seyed Yasin Yazdi Amirkhiz, Kamariah Abu Bakar, Roselan Baki, Arshad Abd Samad, Karim Hajhashemi

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to review the underlying concepts, theoretical background, the existing definitions, various forms of collaborative writing normally used in educational settings as well as some sample studies carried out in different contexts. The article begins by providing an epistemological dichotomy of the existing educational paradigms and discusses the positioning of collaborative learning in relation to the dichotomy (transmissional vs. transformative). It then considers how collaborative writing is theoretically backed up by the ideas of Bakhtin (1981), Halliday (1978), and Vygotsky (1978). The review also compares the salient definitions of collaborative writing and critically contrasts various configurations of collaborative writing with regard to the findings of research studies. The article concludes by recommending a few directions for the future research.

 


Keywords


theoretical background, definitions, forms of collaborative writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.

Blanton, L. L. (1992). Talking students into writing: Using oral fluency to develop literacy. TESOL Journal, 1(4), 23-26.

Bond, M. H. E. (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology: Oxford University Press.

Bruffee, K. A. (1995). Peer tutoring and the "conversation of mankind.". Landmark Essays: Writing Centers, 87-98.

Daiute, C. (1986). Do 1 and 1 Make 2? Written Communication, 3(3), 382.

Davies, N. F., & Omberg, M. (1987). Peer group teaching and the composition class. System, 15(3), 313-323.

Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Ewert, D. E. (2009). L2 writing conferences: Investigating teacher talk. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 251-269.

Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Freedman, S. (1987). Response to Student Writing: Teaching and learning. NCTE Research Monograph Series.

Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Freedman, S., & Sperling, M. (1983). Teacher Student Interaction in the Writing Conference: Response and

Teaching.

Fury, F. (2004). English 1, Spring 2004. Retrieved on July, 4, 2009.

Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers: Continuum Intl Pub Group.

Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences.

TESOL Quarterly, 443-460.

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective: Longman

New York.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning.

London: Arnold.

Hedgcock, J. and N. Lefkowitz (1992). "Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction." Journal of Second Language Writing 1(3): 255-276.

Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7-12.

Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction, University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, G. M. (2004). Cooperative learning: theory, principles and techniques. JF New Paradigm Education.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In

Rijlaarsdam, Gert (Series Ed.), Ransdell, Sarah & Marie-Laure Barbier (Vol. Eds), Studies in Writing, 11, 169-188.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development: Oxford University Press.

Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, 57-68.

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms: University of Michigan Press.

Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content.

Language Learning, 45(4), 605-651.

Louth, R., McAllister, C., & McAllister, H. A. (1993). The effects of collaborative writing techniques on freshman writing and attitudes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61(3), 215-224.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom. ELT Journal, 46(3), 274-284.

Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 745-769.

Mooney, C. (2004). Beware 'sound science.' It's doublespeak for trouble. Washington Post, 29.

Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 307-322.

O'Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: Teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37(01), 1-28.

Powers, J. K. (1993). Rethinking Writing Center Conferencing Strategies for the ESL Writer. Writing Center

Journal, 13(2), 39-47.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.

Saunders, W. M. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational

Research, 13(1), 101-112.

Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 20(4), 286-305.

Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27(3), 363-374.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 14(3), 153-173.

Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions. Annual

Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 275-288.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M. P. G. Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157-177). London, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Topping, K. (2001). Paired collaborative writing.: www.scre.ac.uk/rie/n167/n167topping.html.

Ulichny, P., & Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1989). Interactions and authority: The dominant interpretive framework in

writing conferences. Discourse Processes, 12(3), 309-328.

Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics,

(4), 491-514.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard University

Press.

Weissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. Feedback in Second Language Writing. Contexts and Issues.

Wells, G., Chang, G. L. M., & Maher, A. (1990). Creating classroom communities of literate thinkers.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445.

Williams, J. (2002). Undergraduate Second Language Writers in the Writing Center. Journal of Basic Writing,

(2), 73-91.

Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second

Language Writing, 13(3), 173-201.

Wong, I. (1988). Teacher-student talk in technical writing conference. Written Communication, 5, 444-460.

Wooley, R. S. (2007). The effects of web-based peer review on student writing. Kent State University.

Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 79-101.

Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL

Quarterly, 40(1), 35-58.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.4p.197

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.