Disciplinary and Move Analyses of Hedging in Abstracts of DIPES II Dissertations of the Higher Teachers’ Training college of Maroua

Galbert Demanou, Camilla Arundie Tabe

Abstract


This paper examines hedging as a rhetorical resource employed by fifth year (DIPES II) students of the Higher Teacher Training College of Maroua in Cameroon to show politeness, respect, humility and tentativeness in presenting their arguments or stating facts and subjective opinions. A specialized corpus of 46.368 tokens was used and hedges were retrieved using AntConc 3.4.4. Data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The analysis shows that there is generally an unsatisfactory representation of hedges in the abstracts. The findings further reveal that markers of intentional vagueness, accuracy hedges and writer-oriented hedges are the most common hedging strategies. Students seemingly rely on relatively simpler types of hedging like some, few, may, could, a number of. Conversely, more complicated constructions such as it appears that, it is possible that seem virtually inexistent. Students in the Department of Bilingual Letters were found to be more tentative than their counterparts of other disciplines. It is equally observed that more hedging strategies are used in stating research findings than in any other communicative purpose of the abstracts. In substance, the innovation in this paper may lie on its artful combination of disciplinary investigation with move analysis of hedging in a seemingly ‘marginalized’ academic genre, and its exclusive focus on novice writing in a non-native professional academic institution. This has led to the conclusion that the use of hedging can now be regarded as not only discipline-specific but also move-specific.

Keywords


Academic Writing, Hedging, Genre, Communicative Purpose, Abstract, DIPES II

Full Text:

PDF

References


AL-Quraishy, S.W. (2010). The use of hedging devices in scientific research papers by Iraqi EFL learners. Iraqi academic scientific journals, 6, 1-32. Retrieved from https://www.iasj.net-iasj on 25th October 2017.

Alonzo, A.M., Alonzo, A.R., & Marinas, T.L. (2012). Hedging: An exploratory study of pragmatic transfer in

nonnative English readers’ rhetorical preferences. Iberica, 23, 47-64. Retrieved from www.redalyc.org-articulo

on 25 February, 2017.

Angwah, M.J. (2019). A corpus-based appraisal of doubts and certitude in Cameroon English newspaper writing: Attitude and prospects. Research on humanities and Social sciences, 9(14), 8-16.

Apuge, M. E. (2017). Methods of independent studies. Lectures, University of Maroua, Thursday, 2nd January, 2017

Bagherieh, M. and Afshar, S.H. (2014). The use of hedging devices in English and Persian abstracts of Persian literature and civil engineering MA/MS theses of Iranian writers. Social and behavioral sciences, 98, 1820-1827.

Bailey, S. (2018). Academic writing: A handbook for international students. Routledge: New York.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping writing knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Behnam, B., Darvishzade, A. & Naeimi, A. (2012). A comparative genre analysis of hedging expressions in research

articles: Is fuzziness forever wicked? English Language and literature studies, 2(2), 20-38.

Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing Genre. Harlow: Longman.

Brown, S. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 271-287.

Dallyono, R., Hydayati, F.& Muhammad, A. (2008). The use of hedges in academic discourse. Educationist, 2(1), 27-37.

Demir, C. & Yagiz, O. (2014). Hedging strategies in academic discourse: A comparative analysis of Turkish writers and native writers of English. Social and behavioral science, 158, 260-268.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Academic texts: the importance of the use and comprehension of hedges. Asp, 5 (6), 131-139.

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: a practical handbook. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Hartley, J. & Cabanac, G. (2017). Thirteen ways to write an abstract. MPDI proceedings journal. 5(2), 1-7.

Gilbert, P. (1991). Writing pedagogy: Personal voices, truth telling and real texts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for specific purposes, 13 (3), 239-256.

Hyland, K. (1996a). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13 (2), 251-281.

Hyland, K. (1996b). Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4), 433-454.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2005). Prudence, precision and politeness: hedging in academic writing. Quaderns de filologia, estudias linguistics, 10, 99-112.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource handbook. London: Taylor and Francis group.

Kim, C.H. & Suh, H.W. (2014). Epistemic rhetorical stance: hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 students English writing. 22(2), 61-93.

Koopman, P. (1997). How to write an abstract? 1-6, last modified online, 27 November, 2006, retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org on 25th January, 2018.

Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago linguistic society papers, 8, 183-228.

Li, Q. & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Research article abstracts in two subdisciplines of business-move structure and hedging between Management and Marketing. English language teaching, 8 (1), 52-62.

Liu, H. (2020). A corpus-based study of shields in conversations of Chinese EFL learners. Theory and practice in language studies, 10(7), 828-832.

Ngwobela, M.A. Cheo, N.V. & Nkwetisama, M.C. (2023). Hedging as a crisis communication strategy: the case of the Anglophone crisis in Cameroon (2016-2020). South Asian research journal of arts, language and literature, 5(2), 34-44.

Nivales, M.L.M. (2011). Hedging in college research papers: implication for language instruction. Asian EFL Journal, 35-45.

Nkemleke, D. A. (2010). Cameroonian and foreign scholars’ discourse: The rhetoric of conference abstracts. World Englishes, 29(2), 173-191.

Nkemleke, D. A. (2011). Exploring Academic writing in Cameroon English: a corpus-based perspective. Gottingen: Cuvillier verlag.

Nkemleke, D.A. (2015). Computer corpora in English language research and pedagogy with reference to the corpus of Cameroon English. Syllabus review, 6(2), 93-120.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for specific purposes, 13, 149-170.

Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text,16 (4), 481-

Schmied, J. (2012). Academic knowledge presentation in MA theses: from corpus compilation to case study of disciplinary conventions. Brno studies in English, 38(2), 150-159.

Seskaukine, I. (2008). Hedging in ESL: A case study of Lithuanian learners. Studies about languages, 13, 71-76.

Shen, G. (2010). Corpus-based approaches to translation studies. Cross cultural communication, 6(4), 181-187.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Varsanis, V. N. (2020). The use of hedges and boosters in linguistic research papers written in English by Greek and English native-speaker writers: a corpus-based study. Online PhD thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Whitaker, A. (2014). A step-by-step guide to writing academic papers. Seattle: City University of Seattle.

Yuksel, G. H. & Kavanoz, S. (2015). Expressing claim: hedges in English language Learners’ writing. Journal of teaching and education, 4 (1), 263-269.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.4p.76

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.