The Effect of CLIL Implementation on Students’ Development of English Reading Performance: An Empirical Study of Undergraduate Students in China

Ting Huang, Chenze Wu

Abstract


Previous research has found that content and language integrated learning (CLIL) is an effective method to improve undergraduate students’ English reading performance. Little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms of such this association or factors that might strengthen or weaken these processes. Therefore, based on the framework of action research, the current study aimed to fill this gap by scrutinizing the changes in and effects of academic vocabulary size (AVS), academic self-efficacy (ASE), and learning motivation (LM) on English reading performance over a 16-week semester. A total of 202 Chinese undergraduate students (majoring in English Education) participated in this study. The results revealed the following major findings: (1) students’ AVS, ASE, LM, and English reading performance were significantly improved through CLIL implementation during this semester, (2) AVS, ASE, LM, and English reading performance were positively related to each other, (3) AVS significantly predicted students’ English reading performance, (4) ASE and LM partially mediated the effect of AVS on English reading performance. These findings contribute to the understanding of the impact of CLIL on English reading performance. Limitations and implications for educational practices are discussed.

Keywords


CLIL Implementation, English Reading Performance, Academic Vocabulary Size, Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning Motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydoğan, H. (2018). Content and (English) language integrated learning (CLIL) applied to math lessons. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.2.1.

Alqahtani, A. F. (2020). The relationship between the Saudi cadets’ learning motivation and their vocabulary knowledge. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p1

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011

Chou, F. (2021). A study of the CLIL initiative on higher vocational college’s English education reform. Overseas English, 16(1), 262-263.

Chumbay, J., & Ochoa, J. F. Q. (2020). Language-driven CLIL: Developing written production at the secondary school level. English Language Teaching, 13(8), 74-90.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Coral, J., & Lleixà, T. (2016). Physical education in content and language integrated learning: Successful interaction between physical education and English as a foreign language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(1), 108-126.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.977766

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562.

https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

David, A. (2008). Vocabulary breadth in French L2 learners. The Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 167-180.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389991

De Bree, E., & Zee, M. (2020). The unique role of verbal memory, vocabulary, concentration and self-efficacy in children’s listening comprehension in upper elementary grades. First Language, 41, 1-25.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723720941680

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2003). Preliminary psychometric evaluation of a new self-efficacy scale and its relationship to treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(5), 537-555.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026355004548

Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K. (2013). Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3-33.

https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen

Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 42-530.

https://doi.org/ 10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.530

Gu, J. (2020). Research on academic English reading behaviors: Influencing factors and action mechanism. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 6, 92-98.

He, H. (2021). A study on the current situations and countermeasures for college English reading.

Ibrahim, E. H. E., Sarudin, I., & Muhamad, A. J. (2016). The relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension of ESL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 116-123.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p116

Isiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process: A balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 108-121.

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.41051

Jafarigohar, M., Divsar, H., & Etemad, P. (2022). The effect of CLIL context on the primary education EFL receptive and productive lexical growth. Language Teaching Research, 2, 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221078997

Lauder, B. (1992). Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader’s general academic ability? Journal of Research in Reading, 15(2), 95-103.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00025.x

Laufer, B. (1996). The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension: What it is and how it relates to L1 reading ability. Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 55-62.

Le, N. P., & Nguyen, P. (2022). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) method and how it is changing the foreign language learning landscape. Open Access Library Journal, 9(2), 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108381

Liu, L. (2021). A study on the development of English reading ability of college students. Modern Agricultural Technology, 8, 71-72.

Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins.

Ma, Y., & Lin, W. (2015). A study on the relationship between English reading comprehension and English vocabulary knowledge. Education Research International, 2015, 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/209154

Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

Ohlberger, S., & Wegner, C. (2019). CLIL modules and their affective impact on students with high English anxiety and low self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(3), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201906253409

Olsson, E. (2015). Progress in English academic vocabulary use in writing among CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Moderna Sprak, 109(2), 51-74.

Olsson, E. (2021). A comparative study of CLIL implementation in upper secondary school in Sweden and students’ development of L2 English academic vocabulary. Language Teaching Research, 1-26.

https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211045000

Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. (1988, April 6-8). Development of a college academic selfefficacy scale. [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA, United States.

Pan, Q., & Xu, R. (2011). Vocabulary teaching in English language teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1586-1589.

https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.11.1586-1589

Pan, Y. (2020). A research into college English reading difficulties and analysis. English Square, 120, 104-106.

https://doi.org/10.16723/j.cnki.yygc.2020.12.031

Pancheva, T., & Antov, P. (2017). Application of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in engineering education. Management and Sustainable Development, 63(2), 36-40.

Parsons, R., Hinson, S., & Brown, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Practitioner-researcher models of teaching. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.

https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193

Radner, W., Obermayer, W., & Richter-Mueksch, S. (2002). The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 240(6), 461-467.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5

Rashidi. N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14, 81-108.

Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Read. Res. Quart, 48(4), 369-385.

https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.52

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921

Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159-172.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219.

Sung, K. Y. (2013). L2 motivation in foreign language learning. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 9(2), 19-30.

https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.148423007078284

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2013). A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education. The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 101-129.

https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.05swa

Touré-Tillery, M., & Fishbach, A. (2017). Three sources of motivation. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 123-134.

https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1007

Trudell, B. (2019). Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of “reading culture” in African contexts. International Review of Education, 65(3), 427-442.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09780-7

Tsang, M. K. Y. (2020). Building in language support in a Hong Kong CLIL chemistry classroom. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 8(2), 149-172.

https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18035.tsa

Van Weijen, D., Tillema, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2012). Formulating activities in L1 and L2 and their relation with text quality. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, & M. Castelló (Eds.), Learning to write effectively: Current trends in European research (pp. 183-186). Brill.

Wang, Y. (2020). A study on the existing issues and countermeasures for college English vocabulary teaching. Education Teaching Forum, 48, 293-295.

Xie, J. (2020). A study on the current situation and higher vocational college’s English online teaching and countermeasures. The Science Education Article Collects, 29(1), 172-173.

Xing, Z. (2021). A study on college vocabulary teaching. Journal of Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, 23, 62-63.

https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3723.2021.05.020.

Yancey, G. B. (2014). Self-efficacy. Salem Press Encyclopedia Of Health.

Yang, F. (2011). An investigation into the current situations of senior high school students’ English reading. Basic Foreign Language Education, 13, 38-42.

Zhang, L. J., & Anual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension: the case of secondary school students learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51-76.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208091140

Zhou, S., & Liu, Z. (2020). Challenges and countermeasures of online teaching in the COVID-19 context. Tonghua Normal University Journal (Social Science), 4, 88-92.

https://doi.org/10.13877/j.cnki.cn22-1284.2020.04.019




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.3p.14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.