Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Comparison of Gratitude across Context Variations: A Generic Analysis of Dissertation Acknowledgements Written by Taiwanese Authors in EFL and ESL Contexts
Abstract
Research on generic structures of acknowledgements in dissertations has gradually drawn attention in various contexts. However, there is relatively scant research on the ways in which acknowledgements are written by authors with mutually similar cultural backgrounds but in two different academic environments and language contexts. To fill this gap, this study compared 60 PhD dissertation acknowledgements written by Taiwanese postgraduates in Taiwan, an EFL context, with another 60 written by Taiwanese scholars who obtained their doctorates in the United States, an ESL context. The focus was on the generic structures and linguistic features of the writing styles of the two groups. The study aimed to investigate whether divergences existed in the two different academic and language settings, but with the writers sharing the same cultural and language background. If such divergences did exist, the likely causes would be explored. The results revealed that firstly, the participants in both contexts generally followed a three-tier structure when writing their dissertation acknowledgements, namely, reflecting, thanking, and announcing moves. However, academic conventions, institutional preferences and the language context, together with socio-cultural factors, affected their construction of moves/steps and their choice of linguistic elements. It was found that the rhetorical language in both corpora was relatively direct, emotional and precise.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afful, J., & Mwinlaaru, I. (2010a). Commonality and individuality in academic writing: An analysis of conference paper titles of four scholars. English for Specific Purposes World, 27(1), 1-32.
Afful, J., & Mwinlaaru, I. (2010b). The construction of multiple identities in the acknowledgement section of a masters dissertation. English for Specific Purposes World, 30(9), 1-26.
Al-Ali, M. N. (2006). Conveying academic and social identity in graduate dissertation acknowledgments. Fifth International Conference of European Association of Language for Specific Purposes (pp. 35-42). Zaragoza, Spain.
Al-Ali, M. N. (2010). Generic patterns and socio-cultural resources in acknowledgements accompanying Arabic PhD dissertations. Pragmatics, 20(1), 1-26.
Archer, D. (2009). Does frequency really matter? In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a Word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction (pp. 1-16). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Atai, M. R., & Falah, S. (2005). A contrastive genre analysis of result and discussion sections of applied linguistic research articles written by native and non-native English speakers with respect to evaluated entities and ascribed values. Retrieved August 19, 2011, from http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL10/pdfs/atai.pdf
Baker, P. (2009). ‘The question is, how cruel is it?’ Keywords, Fox Hunting and the House of Commons. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a Word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction (pp. 125-136). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Bazerman, C. (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W. Bishop & H. Ostrum (Eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives (pp. 19-26). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Applied Genre Analysis and ESP. In T. Miller (Ed.): Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications (pp. 134-149). Washington D.C.: US Information Agency.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.
Brett. P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, (13)1, 47-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 57-75). London: Longman.
Cheng, W., & Kuo, C-H. (2011). A pragmatics analysis of MA thesis acknowledgements. Asian ESP Journal, 7(3), 29-58.
Cheng, W. (2012). A contrastive study of master thesis acknowledgements by Taiwanese and North American students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(1), 8-17.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000a). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 143-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430050011399
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (200b). Globalisation and societal culture: Redefining schooling and school leadership in the twenty-first century. Compare, 30(3), 303-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713657474
Dudley-Evans, T., & Henderson, W. (1990). The organisation of article introductions: Evidence of change in economics writing. In T. Dudley-Evans & W. Henderson (Eds.), The Language of Economics: The analysis of economics discourse (ELT Documents 134) (pp. 67-78), London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
Flowerdew, J., & Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 463-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.463
Frow, J. (2006). Genre: The new critical idiom series. London: Routledge.
Giannoni, D. (2002). Words of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgement texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.1
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In H. P. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the way of words (pp. 22-40). Cambridge, MA: Howard University Press.
Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics, 36: 293-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00090-0
Hofstede, G. H. (1991). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw Hill.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(1), 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson.
Hyland, K. (2003). Dissertation Acknowledgements: The Anatomy of a Cinderella Genre. Written Communication, 20(3), 242-268.
Hyland, K. (2004a). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2004b). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor” Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00062.x
Kaplan, R. B. (1987) Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 9-21). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lasaky, F. (2011). A contrastive study of generic organisation of doctoral dissertation acknowledgements written by native and non-native (Iranian) students in applied linguistics. The Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 175-199.
Lee, S. (2002, June). Politeness and E-mail discourse: A study on the use of linguistic forms of politeness by Chinese learners of English. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference ‘Knowing and discourse: Speculating on disciplinary futures’. Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
Lu, L. C., Rose, G. M., & Blodgett, J. G. (1999). The effects of cultural dimensions on ethical decision making in marketing: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 91-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006038012256
Martin, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3
Nkemleke, D. (2006). Nativisation of dissertation acknowledgements and private letters in Cameroon. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 166-184.
Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of English Studies, 5(3), 111-132.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the Language Learning Classroom. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10, 365-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365
Samaraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
Samaraj, B. (2005). An exploration of genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools (Version 5.0) [Computer Software]. Liverpool, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.
Scott, M. & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Keywords and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scrivener, L. (2009). An exploratory analysis of history students’ dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(3), 241-251.
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions (Aston ESP Rep. No. 1). Birmingham: Aston University.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2009). Worlds of genre-metaphors of genre. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 3-16). West Lafayette, IN: Parlour.
Thompson, D. K. (1993). Arguing for experimental “facts” in science. Written Communication, 10, 106-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001004
Williams, I. (1999) Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00003-9
Yang, R., & Alison, D. (2003). RAs in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Yang. W. H. (2003). An interpretative analysis of teachers’ perceptions of educational change in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK.
Yang, W. H. (2011). One culture, diverse gratitude: A genre analysis of dissertation acknowledgements. [Paper submitted to a journal under being reviewed]. Unpublished paper.
Zhao, M., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Dissertation Acknowledgements: Generic Structure and Linguistic Features. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 94-109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.5p.130
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.