The Linguistic Functions in King Abdullah II of Jordan Speeches

Abdelaziz Mohammed

Abstract


The common sense is that each time you revise a discourse you can find new points behind the lines. Thus, this paper aims at analyzing and investigating King Abdullah II of Jordan speech qualitatively. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is used to analyze King Abdullah’s speech based on Grice’s maxims; Van Dijk; Fairclough; and Johnson and Johnson’s models to study both the persuasion styles and persuasion strategies he maintained in his speech. The study concludes that using evidence plays a crucial role in persuading the audience. Thus, it is highly recommended to read/listen to any political discourse in the mirror of its pillars and evidence shown by the speaker should not be taken as a dirty speech.


Keywords


Discourse Analysis, Persuasive Techniques, Self-image, Analogy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Sowaidi, B., Banda, F., and Mansour, A. (2015) Doing Politics in the Recent Arab Uprising: Towards a Political Discourse Analysis of the Arab Spring Slogans. Journal of Asian and African Studies, (25.) Arab news. Retrieved from: http:www.arabnews.com/node/958321/Saudi-arabia. And from: http://youtube/FqSzlxkspBQ

Bach, Kent. (2014) "Speech Acts." Speech Acts. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2014.

Bateson, Gregory. (1954). A theory of play and fantasy. Steps to an ecology of mind, 93-177. New York: Ballantine.

Birch, D. (1989). Language, Literature and Critical Practice: Ways of analyzing Text. London and New York: Routledge.

Carol Lynn, Moder; Aida Martinovic-Zic (2004). Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 117. 9027230781.

Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.

Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (2002). Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schaffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: Benjamin.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Pearson Education Limited.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.

Farrelly, M. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis in Political Studies: An Illustrative Analysis of the 'Empowerment' Agenda. Politics, Vol. 30, (2), 98-104.

Fillmore, Ch. C. (1985) Frames and the Semantics of Understanding. Quadernidi Semantica. Vol. VI, pp. 222−254

Firth, J. R. 1968a. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955 (Special volume of the Philological Society, Oxford, 1957, 1-31). In Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952-1959, ed. F. R. Palmer, 168-205. London: Longman.

Firth, J. R. 1968b. Descriptive linguistics and the study of English. In Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952-1959, ed. F. R. Palmer, 96-113. London: Longman.

Firth, J. R. 1968c. Linguistic analysis as a study of meaning. In Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952 1959, ed. F. R. Palmer, 12-26. London: Longman.

Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The Authority of Interpretative Communicaties. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985a). Spoken and Written Language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985b). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Harris, S. (2000). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews and campaign effect. Annul. In Harris (1991) Rev. 2000. 51:149-169.

Hasan, Ruqaiya. (1971). Rhyme and Reason in Literature. In Seymor Chatman (ed.), Literary style: a symposium. New York: Oxford University Press.

Herman, V. (1995). Dramatic discourse. Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London and New York: Routledge.

Jakobson, Roman. (1960). Closing Statements: Linguistics and Poetics Style in language. T.A. Sebeka, New-York.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2000). Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology. Journal of Peace Psychology, 6, 291-317. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.co-operation.org/pages/contro-pol.html

Keyser, Samuel Jay. (1980). ―Wallace Stevens: Form and Meaning in Four Poems.‖. In Marvin K. L. Ching, Michael C. Haley, and Ronald F. Lunsford. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Literature. London: Routledge.

Klebanov, P. B., Diermier, D., and Beigman, E. (2008). Lexical Cohesion Analysis of Political Speech. Political Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 4, Special Issue, pp. 447-463.

Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor in politics: An open letter to the internet from George Lakoff. Retrieved from Center for the Cognitive Science of Metaphor Online Web site: http://www.uoregon.edu/~uophil/metaphor/lakoff-1.htm

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., (1995). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/467716.html

Littell, F. H. (1995). "The Language of Assault vs the Language of Dialogue". The Christian Ethics Today Foundation, December 1995 (Issue 4 Page 23). Retrieved from http://christianethicstoday.com/cetart/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.main&ArtID=259

Mazrui, A. (1975). The political sociology of the English language. The Hague: Mouton.

McGregor, S. (2003).Critical Science and Critical Discourse Analysis. Vol. 15, No. 1.

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty–Four. London: Secker & Warburg. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Pinter, H. (2005). Art, truth, & politics. Retrieved From http://www.nobelprize.org and from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2005/pinter-lecture-e.html

Ranney, A. (1975). The governing of men (4th ed.) Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

Rylance, S. & Simons, J. (2001). Literature in Context. Palgrave: Macmillan.

Schaffner, C. (1996). Editorial: Political speeches and discourse analysis. [Electronic version]. Current issues in language & society, 3, 201-204. Retrieved from http://www.multilingual-matters.net/cils/003/0201/cils0030201.pdf.

Sinclair, J. M., (1992). Trust the text. In Advances in systemic linguistics, ed. M. Davies and L. Ravelli, 5-19. London: Pinter.

Stubbs, M. (1993). Words and phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tannen, Deborah (1993) Framing in Discourse. Oxford University Press. Oxford. USA.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4, 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995) Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. Retrieved December 26, 2016 from: http://www.discourse.org

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). What is political discourse analysis? In: Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics. (pp. 11-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Political discourse and ideology. Retrieved from: http://www.discoursein-society.org

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse. Spain: Elsevier Ltd.

Wodak, R. (2007) "Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross disciplinary Inquiry", Pragmatics & Cognition, 19: 25-203.

Yule, G. (1997). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.