A Comparison of Malaysian Ethnic and Political Stand-up Comedies’ Text Structures and Use of Politeness Strategies

Chan Teik Onn

Abstract


This paper attempts to investigate and compare the text structures of ethnic and political Malaysian stand-up comedies and their use of politeness strategies to mitigate backlash. To this end, a mixed method approach was adopted where the structural properties were tabulated to determine the dominant structural patterns of the stand-up comedies. Additionally, a content analysis was used to examine the different politeness strategies used in both types of stand-up comedies. A sample of 17 ethnic jokes and 13 political jokes were analyzed using Hockett’s (1960) Internal Structure of Jokes and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) Politeness Strategies as frameworks of analyses. Results on the textual structures showed that although the two types of comedies employed the standard three part structures which are build-up, pivot and punch line. Build-ups were used more in ethnic jokes than political jokes. This could be due to the nature of ethnic stand-up comedy where comedians need to specify a target stereotype to prevent generalization. In terms of politeness strategies used off record strategy was the dominant strategy in both types of jokes, although political jokes over-relied on this strategy, which is 32.33 % in ethnic jokes and 56.66% in political jokes. It was also found that ethnic jokes, had a more diverse use of politeness strategies due to its different payoffs such as to mitigate backlash by showing hesitation with discourse markers and using word choices that showed a partial understanding to the aspects of a race that they were making fun of, unlike political jokes, which focused on ambiguity so as not to directly name the political figure in their jokes. In short, findings from this paper may serve as a valuable resource for not only aspiring comedians but also public speakers in presenting social criticism without risking backlash.

Keywords


Stand-Up Comedy, Ethnic Jokes, Political Jokes, Joke Structure, Politeness Strategies, Backlash

Full Text:

PDF

References


Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. & Chabanne, J. (1992). Jokes as a Text Type. Humor. 5(1/2). 165-172.

Attardo, S. & Pickering, L. (2011).Timing in the performance of jokes. Humor. 24(2). 233-250. doi: 10.1515/HUMR.2011.015

Azizudin, M. (2007). Freedom of Speech and Democracy in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 85-104.doi: 10.1080/02185370801962440

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Forceville, C. (2005). Addressing an audience: Time, place, and genre in Peter van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. International Journal of Humor Research. 18(3), 247-278.

Gadavanij, S. (2002). “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Confidence Debates in Thailand.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9, 35-55. doi: 10.1.1.490.7238

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss4/6

Graeme, R. (2004). The linguistic analysis of jokes. London: Routledge.

Hockett, C. F. (1960). Jokes. The View From Language. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Jakoaho, V. & Marjamäki, S. (2012). “Oh My God, That Nigger Said Gun!”: Use of ethnic humor in modern stand-up comedy (Master’s Thesis), University of Jyväskylä, 2012.

Katayama, H. (2009). A Cross Cultural Analysis of Humor in Stand-Up Comedy in the United States and Japan. Docdroid. Retrieved from https://www.docdroid.net/l96u/katayama-cross-cultural-analysis-2009.pdf

McGarty, C. Yzerbyt. V. &R. Spears. (2002). Stereotypes as explanations: the formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. London; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mindiola, T. Flores, Y. & N. Rodriguez. (2002). Black-brown relations and stereotypes. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Selma, K. (2014). Examining Labov’s Model and Related Frameworks in Stand-Up Comedy Delivering Jokes and Stories. Academia. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/8486423/examining_Labovs_model_in_stand_up_comedy

Sinclair et al. (1992). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

Toikka, M. & Vento, M. (2000). Ala Naurattaa! Stand Up – komedian käsikirja. Cosmoprint: Helsinki.

Van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. Discourses. Retrieved from http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse,%20power%20and%20access.pdf

Walsh, W.B. (1995). Tests and Assessment. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Wilson, C. P. (1979). Jokes: Form, Content, Use and Function. Academic Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.7p.182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.