Effectiveness of E-learning Mode for Teaching English Language in Arab Universities

Bilal Mohd Zakarneh


E-learning is increasingly being embraced by the traditional academic institutions, hybrid educational organizations and newly established online organizations for teaching English and other subjects in universities in the Arab world. The present study investigated the effectiveness of using e-learning platform to teach the English language to students in Arab universities. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analysed using excel data analysis tool. Results revealed that e-learning platform is an effective platform for teaching English language. Participants held that they learned better via e-learning and that all English language courses should be taught through the e-learning mode. They consider e-learning platform as appropriate and better means for acquiring vocabulary, developing speaking skills, English language grammar, reading skills, writing skills, listening skills, and as a better mode of enhancing performance in English than the traditional classroom mode. They see e-learning as a better tool for testing and evaluation and prefer it to other traditional methods. Conclusion: e-learning can be more effective in learning English than the face-to-face classroom system.


E-Learning, Blended learning, E-Learning Tools, Web-based Tools, Traditional classroom System

Full Text:



Alasraj, D. (2014). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Teaching Arabic as a Second Language. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 1(1), 13-17.

Al-Shehri, A. M. (2010). E-learning in Saudi Arabia: ‘To E or not to E, that is the question’. Journal of family and community medicine, 17(3), 147.

Al-Abdullatif, A.M. (2011). An Investigation into the Perceptions of University Students and Instructors on the Effectiveness of Online Education in a Saudi Tertiary Environment. Doctoral Dissertation Submitted to School of Education & Professional Studies, Arts, Education & Law. Graffith University.

Beauvios, M. H. (1997). "Computer-mediated communication (CMC): Technology for improving speaking and writing." In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning, 165-184. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.

Cai, H. (2012). International Conference on Future Computer Supported Education

E-learning and English Teaching. IERI Procedia, 2; 841 –846.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J.L. (2000). "Networked multimedia environments for second language learning" In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based Language Teaching: Concept and Practice, 151-170.

Carr-Chellman, A. (2006). Desperate technologies: Critical Issues in e-learning and implications for higher education. Journal of Thought, 41(1), 95-119.

Emerson, L., & Mackay, B. (2011). A comparison between paper-based and online learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technologies, 42(5), 727-735.

George-Palilonis, J., & Filak, V. (2009). Blended learning in the visual communications classroom: Student reflections on a multimedia course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(3), 247 – 256. Retrieved from www.ejel.org.

Ghaffari, A., & Abbas, E. (2011). Improving education in adult through online learning. Life Science Journal, 8(3), Retrieved from http://www.lifesciencesite.com.

Hartnett, M., George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining Motivation in Online Distance Learning Environments: Complex, Multifaceted, and Situation-Dependent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6): 20-38.

Hjeltnes, T.A. & Hansson, B. (2004).Cost efficiency and cost effectiveness in e learning.

Hughes, J.E., McLeod, S., Brown, R., Maeda, Y., & Choi, J. (2007). Academic achievement and perceptions of the learning environment in virtual and traditional secondary mathematics classrooms. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 199-214.

Iverson, K.M., Colky, D.L., & Cyboran, V. (2005). E-learning takes the lead: An empirical investigation of learner differences in online and classroom delivery. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(4), 5-18.

Johnson, S., Aragon, S., Shaik, N., Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner’s satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. JI. of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49.

Jenkinson, J. (2009). Measuring the effectiveness of educational technology: What are were attempting to measure? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(3).

Jeong-Bae Son, K. (2014). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Learners, Teachers and Tools. New York, NY: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Kim, S. (2002). "CMC-based interaction for collaboration in a web-based

English reading course: A case study". Foreign Languages Education, l9(4), 57-91.

Khan, I.A. (2011). Effectiveness of E-learning for the Teaching of English: A Study of Comparative Strategies. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3): 30-60.

Lee, C., & Pyo, K. (2003). "A study on the effectiveness of online/offline English language learning at university level". Multimedia- Assisted Language Learning, 6(1), 90-110.

Lee, S., Kim, J., Lee, J., & Liu, X. (2005). "The Effectiveness of Online Situated Environments for Language Learning", Proceedings of 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 1-4.

Maltby, J.R., & Whittle, J. (2000). Learning programming online: Student Perceptions and Performance. Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2000 Conference. Retrieved 5th April 2018 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/coffs00/papers/john_maltby.pdf.

Mangan, K. S. (2001). Expectations evaporate for online MBA programs. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(6), 31.

Means, B., Toyama, Y.R., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington: US Department of Education.

McCombs, B. L., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582-1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1467 9620.2005.00534.x.

Motteran, G. (2001). The role of synchronous communication in fully distance education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 131-149.

Pelletieri, J. (2000). "Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence", In M. Warschaue (Ed.), Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning, 59-86. Honolulu, Hi: University of Hawaii. Second Language.

Qugley, D. (2011). E-Learning as a Strategy to Teach English in Thailand: A Professional Development Model to Support Teacher Growth. US-China Education Review A, 5, 624-631

Quis, Q. (---). Interoperability and Standards in e-learning. Trondheim, Norway: TISIP Research Foundation.

O'Donoghue, J., & Groves, M.J. (2009). Reflections of Students in Their Use of Asynchronous Online Seminars. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 143–149

Ramage, T.R. (2002). The "No Significant Difference" Phenomenon: A Literature Review. Ramage FINAL Retrieved from https://globalelearningjournal.files.wordpress.com/.../glover-and-lewis-student-prefere

Rosenbaum, D. B. (2001). E-learning beckons busy professionals. ENR, 246(21), 38-42

Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. North Carolina: IDEC.

Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). "A comparative study of two ESL writing environment: computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom", System, 24, 491-501,

Schulman, A.H., & Smith, R.L. (1999). Learning in an online platform versus an in-class format: An experimental study. T.H.E. Journal, 26(11), 54-56.

Smith, L. J. (2001). Content and delivery: A comparison and contrast of electronic and traditional MBA marketing planning courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 3.

Son, J. (2011). 'Online Tools for Language Teaching', Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Available: http://www.teslej.org/wordpress/ issues/volume 15/ ej57/ ej57int/, [16 March 2015].

Urij, L.Z., Dmitrii, V.M., Bogdan, U.V. (2016). An effective role of e-learning technology for English Language Teaching by using meta communication actors.

Yale Centre for Language (2015). 'Online Teaching Tools and Resources'. Available: http://cls.yale.edu/online-teaching-toolsresources.

Westberry, N. C., (2009). An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within tertiary level e-Learning environments, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/10289/4184/3/thesis.pdf.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.7p.171


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.