Social Functions of Conditional Apologies in Business Communication

Xing Zhang

Abstract


The objective of this study is to investigate what social functions conditional apologies perform. To this end, naturally occurring conditional apologies were identified in an authentic business corpus, the Cambridge Business English Corpus (CBEC). From the perspective of speakers’ face needs, two research questions were discussed. The first question asks what the functions are that conditional apologies are employed to fulfil when used by speakers. The second question is whether conditional apologies are oriented towards the speaker’s positive needs. In the spoken and written corpora of the CBEC, occurrences of sorry-based expressions (sorry and I’m sorry) collocating with if are extracted, and the ratios of occurrences of conditional apologies to all apologies of sorry-based expression are compared. Our findings indicate that in business communication, the conditional apology could be used as a downgrading strategy for the purpose of denying full responsibility and decreasing face-threat to the speakers. The conditional apology could also be used by speakers to distance themselves from the offense, question the offensiveness of the event and to deny the speaker’s knowledge of it or involvement in it. Furthermore, through analysis of real examples, conditional apologies are determined to be driven by a desire to satisfy the speaker’s positive face needs in these contexts. In addition, our observation reveals that there is a tendency for the conditional apology to be used with a coordinating conjunction but to add a contrast statement in order to add detailed explanation regarding the causes of those offenses.

Keywords


Conditional Apology, Social Functions, Positive Needs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bisel, R. S., & Messersmith, A. S. (2012). Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness: Apology giving in work settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 425-448.

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Čubajevaitė, L., & Ruzaitė, J. (2007). Apologies in business communication. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 3, 67-81.

Davila, J. C. (2004). Forgiveness as a function of offense severity, apology extensiveness, and perceived sincerity: A theoretical model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tulane University, New Orleasn, LA, USA.

Edmondson, W. J. (1981). On saying you’re sorry. Conversational routine, 273-288.

Edmondson, W. J., & House, J. (1981). Let's talk, and talk about it: a pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Urban & Schwarzenberg.

Eisinger, R. M. (2011). The political non-apology. Society, 48(2), 136-141.

Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Intra-lingual pragmatic variation in Mexico City and San Jose, Costa Rica: A focus on regional differences in female requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2992-3011.

Filimonova, V. (2016). Russian and Spanish Apologies: A Contrastive Pragmalinguistic Study. IULC Working Papers, 15(1).

Fraser, B. (1981). On apologizing. Conversational routine, 259-271.

Friedman, H. H. (2006). The power of remorse and apology. Journal of College and Character, 7(1).

Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213-231.

Goffman, E. (1971). The structure of remedial interchange. Relation in public. New York: Basic Books.

Hoffman, D. A. (2002). The use of apology and employment cases. Employee Rights Quarterly, 2(3), 21-30.

Holmes, J. (1990). Apologies in New Zealand English 1. Language in Society, 19(2), 155-199.

Jebahi, K. (2011). Tunisian university students’ choice of apology strategies in a discourse completion task. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 648-662.

Kasper, G. (1988). Variation in interlanguage speech act realization. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in English as a Second Language 7 (2).

Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures, 316341.

Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. Interlanguage Pragmatics, 3, 15.

Kitao, S. K., & Kitao, K. (2013). Apologies, apology strategies, and apology forms for non-apologies in a spoken corpus. Journal of Culture and Information Science, 8(2), 1-13.

Levi, D. L. (1997). The role of apology in mediation. NYUL Rev., 72, 1165.

Meier, A. J. (1992). Brown and Levinson’s legacy of politeness. VIenna English Working paperS, 15.

Miller, K. (2014). Conditional and prospective apologies. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 48(3), 403-417.

Norrick, N. R. (1978). Expressive illocutionary acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 2(3), 277-291.

Nureddeen, F. A. (2008). Cross cultural pragmatics: Apology strategies in Sudanese Arabic. Journal of pragmatics, 40(2), 279-306.

Ogiermann, E. (2008). On the culture-specificity of linguistic gender differences: The case of English and Russian apologies1. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(3), 259-286.

Ogiermann, E. (2009). On Apologising in Positive and Negative Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Olshtain, E. (1989). Apologies across languages. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, 155173.

Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, 18-35.

Shuman, D. W. (1999). The role of apology in tort law. Judicature, 83, 180.

Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies (Vol. 7). Walter de Gruyter.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.5p.96

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.