The Effect of Mnemonic Keyword Techniques Instruction on Vocabulary Achievement and vocabulary Size of Iranian EFL Learners

Amir Marzban, Mojgan Firoozjahantigh

Abstract


This study aimed at probing the effect of using mnemonic keyword techniques, a number of less used procedures, in teaching vocabulary in an EFL context in Iran on the vocabulary achievement level and vocabulary size of language learners. to this end, 70 EFL intermediate students were selected because they were all intermediate level learners. They were assigned to control and experimental groups. The instructor taught the two groups new vocabulary items in their textbooks as part of the class procedures. The first group received vocabulary instruction through mnemonic keyword techniques while the second had vocabulary taught in conventional ways. Both groups were tested for their EFL vocabulary achievement and vocabulary size. The results revealed significantly higher achievement and vocabulary size levels for the participants in the experimental group. Certain implications were provided for EFL instructors, material developers and EFL learners who pursue to boost their vocabulary levels more effectively.

Keywords


Mnemonic, Keyword, Techniques, Efl, Vocabulary, Teaching, Vocabulary Size

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiryousefi, M., & Ketabi, S. (2011). Mnemonic Instruction: A Way to Boost Vocabulary Learning and Recall. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(1).

Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.

Corson, D. J. (1983). The Corson measure of passive vocabulary. Language and Speech, 26(1), 3-20.

Corson, D. (1997). The learning and use of academic English words. Language learning, 47(4), 671-718.

Freihat, S., & Al-Makhzoomi, K. (2012). An English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course for nursing students in jordan and the role a needs analysis played. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(7), 129-145.

French-Allen, V. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. Oxford University Press.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.

Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure?. Reading in a foreign language, 8, 689-689.

Karami, M. (2014). The Effect of Extended Mnemonic Keyword Method on Vocabulary Achievement and Expansion among Iranian EFL Learners: A thesis in teaching English to speakers of other languages (master’s thesis).IAU, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Kasper, L. F. (1993). The keyword method and foreign language vocabulary learning: A rationale for its use. Foreign Language Annals, 26(2), 244-251.

Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different?. Applied linguistics, 19(2), 255-271

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language testing, 16(1), 33-51.

Lee, S. H. (2003). ESL learners’ vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System, 31(4), 537-561.

Lee, S. H., & Muncie, J. (2006). From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners' use of vocabulary in a postreading composition task. Tesol Quarterly, 40(2), 295-320.

Manshourian, F. (2016).Conventional Techniques of Vocabulary Teaching vs. Novel Mnemonic Keyword Procedure: The Case of Vocabulary Achievement and Vocabulary Size among Iranian EFL Learners: A thesis in teaching English to speakers of other languages (master’s thesis). Alborz University, Qazvin, Iran.

McCrostie, J. (2007). Examining learner vocabulary notebooks. ELT journal, 61(3), 246-255.

Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I. (2016). Tools for researching vocabulary (Vol. 105). Multilingual Matters.

Melka-Teichroew, F. (1982). Receptive versus productive vocabulary: A survey. Inter language Studies Bulletin, 5-33.

Melka-Teichroew, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 33(2), 84-102.

Milton, J. (2008). Vocabulary uptake from informal learning tasks. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 227-237.

Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 14, 6-19.

Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Pillai, Nirmala Ramakrishnan. "Using mnemonics to improve vocabulary, boost memory and enhance creativity in the ESL classroom." The English Teacher (2017): 22.

Qoreishi, A. (2014).The Impact of Mind Mapping On Vocabulary Achievement of Iranian EFL Learners in Pooya Language Institute in Bandar Abbas: A thesis in teaching English to speakers of other languages (master’s thesis).IAU, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.

Saslow, J. M., Ascher, A., & Morsberger, R. E. (2006). Top Notch: English for today's world 2. Pearson Longman.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Seyyedrezaie, S. H., & Barani, G. (2013). Constructivism and Curriculum Development. International Journal of Basic & Applied Research, 2(1), 62-67.

Siriganjanavong, V. (2013). The Mnemonic Keyword Method: Effects on the Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 1-10.

Sorayaie Azar, A. (2012). The effect of games on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 1(02), 252-256.

Wallace, M. J. (1982). Teaching vocabulary (No. 10). Heinemann.

Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Collins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.4p.222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2018 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.